07/07/2021 21:04, Honnappa Nagarahalli:
>
>
> >
> > In the deprecation notices of DPDK 21.05, we can still read this:
> > "
> > * rte_atomicNN_xxx: These APIs do not take memory order parameter. This
> > does
> > not allow for writing optimized code for all the CPU architectures
> > supported
>
> In the deprecation notices of DPDK 21.05, we can still read this:
> "
> * rte_atomicNN_xxx: These APIs do not take memory order parameter. This
> does
> not allow for writing optimized code for all the CPU architectures supported
> in DPDK. DPDK will adopt C11 atomic operations semantics
On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 08:33:21 +
Ruifeng Wang wrote:
> >
> > > > One simple example: increment a counter atomically.
> > > > __atomic_fetch_add(&counter, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); or
> > > > __atomic_add_fetch(&counter, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> >
> > I really hate how atomics are "documented" i
en ;
> nd
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] atomic operations
>
> 05/07/2021 09:00, Ruifeng Wang:
> > From: Thomas Monjalon
> > > 03/07/2021 13:29, Thomas Monjalon:
> > > > In the deprecation notices of DPDK 21.05, we can still read this:
> > > >
05/07/2021 09:00, Ruifeng Wang:
> From: Thomas Monjalon
> > 03/07/2021 13:29, Thomas Monjalon:
> > > In the deprecation notices of DPDK 21.05, we can still read this:
> > > "
> > > * rte_atomicNN_xxx: These APIs do not take memory order parameter.
> > This does
> > > not allow for writing optimi
dk.org;
> david.march...@redhat.com; David Christensen
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] atomic operations
>
> 03/07/2021 13:29, Thomas Monjalon:
> > In the deprecation notices of DPDK 21.05, we can still read this:
> > "
> > * rte_atomicNN_xxx: These APIs do not take memory
03/07/2021 19:30, Stephen Hemminger:
> Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > It is very difficult to find which wrapper to use.
> >
> > This is the guide we have:
> > https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/prog_guide/writing_efficient_code.html#locks-and-atomic-operations
> > There are 2 blog posts:
> > https://www.dp
03/07/2021 13:29, Thomas Monjalon:
> In the deprecation notices of DPDK 21.05, we can still read this:
> "
> * rte_atomicNN_xxx: These APIs do not take memory order parameter. This does
> not allow for writing optimized code for all the CPU architectures supported
> in DPDK. DPDK will adopt C11
On Sat, 03 Jul 2021 13:29:38 +0200
Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> In the deprecation notices of DPDK 21.05, we can still read this:
> "
> * rte_atomicNN_xxx: These APIs do not take memory order parameter. This does
> not allow for writing optimized code for all the CPU architectures supported
> in
9 matches
Mail list logo
