Re: [dpdk-dev] rte epoll functions

2020-04-27 Thread Lukasz Wojciechowski
W dniu 27.04.2020 o 18:57, Stephen Hemminger pisze: > On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:01:21 +0200 > David Marchand wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 4:51 PM Stephen Hemminger >> wrote: >>> On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:33:27 + >>> Liron Himi wrote: >>> Hi, We noticed that the impl

Re: [dpdk-dev] rte epoll functions

2020-04-27 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:01:21 +0200 David Marchand wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 4:51 PM Stephen Hemminger > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:33:27 + > > Liron Himi wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > We noticed that the implementation of rte_epoll_wait doesn't stopped on > > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] rte epoll functions

2020-04-27 Thread David Marchand
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 4:51 PM Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:33:27 + > Liron Himi wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > We noticed that the implementation of rte_epoll_wait doesn't stopped on > > signal such as SIGINT. > > > > Is anyone know why? > > > > If that on purpose and

Re: [dpdk-dev] rte epoll functions

2020-04-27 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:33:27 + Liron Himi wrote: > Hi, > > > We noticed that the implementation of rte_epoll_wait doesn't stopped on > signal such as SIGINT. > > Is anyone know why? > > If that on purpose and cannot be changed, how application can exit gracefully > when using rx interru