[dpdk-dev] Making rte_eal_pci_probe() in rte_eal_init() optional?

2015-11-14 Thread Jan Viktorin
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 22:58:04 + Don Provan wrote: > --no-pci is cool. I'm pretty sure that wasn't there when the PCI scan was > first added to > the library init routine. I'm glad to see it, so thanks for pointing it out. > > Just for the record: The comment says, "for debug purposes, PCI ca

[dpdk-dev] Making rte_eal_pci_probe() in rte_eal_init() optional?

2015-11-14 Thread Roger B. Melton
Agreed. For our application, the debug case would be to _enable_ the PCI scan. Again, thanks David for pointing it out. It did solve our problem. Regards, Roger On 11/13/15 5:58 PM, Don Provan wrote: > --no-pci is cool. I'm pretty sure that wasn't there when the PCI scan was > first added t

[dpdk-dev] Making rte_eal_pci_probe() in rte_eal_init() optional?

2015-11-14 Thread David Marchand
Hello Roger, On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Roger B. Melton wrote: > Agreed. For our application, the debug case would be to _enable_ the PCI > scan. > > Again, thanks David for pointing it out. It did solve our problem. The only problem with --no-pci is that I think that vfio won't work p