Complete the missing logic of parse the tunnel id of IPv4 NVGRE tunnel
and send it to the firmware by control message.
Fixes: 88cce0538073 ("net/nfp: support IPv4 NVGRE encap flow action")
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Chaoyong He
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund
---
drivers/net/nfp/nfp_flow
Complete the missing logic of parse the tunnel id of IPv6 NVGRE tunnel
and send it to the firmware by control message.
Fixes: fff680eef7f9 ("net/nfp: support IPv6 NVGRE encap flow action")
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Chaoyong He
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund
---
drivers/net/nfp/nfp_flow
On Tuesday, June 13, 2023 9:43 AM, zhoumin wrote:
> On Mon, June 12, 2023 at 8:44PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 12/06/2023 13:58, zhoumin:
> >> On Mon, June 12, 2023 at 6:26PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>> 15/05/2023 04:10, Zhang, Qi Z:
> From: Ruifeng Wang
> > From: Min Zhou
> >> --
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:41:37 +0800
Phil Yang wrote:
> Reduce the number of loops to 10K to avoid the meson test timeout
> warning.
>
> For example:
> $ sudo meson test -C build --suite DPDK:fast-tests / atomic_autotest -t 50
> [...]
> 1/1 DPDK:fast-tests / atomic_autotest OK 187.35s
> -Original Message-
> From: Ivan Malov
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2023 11:33 PM
> To: Zhang, Qi Z
> Cc: tho...@monjalon.net; or...@nvidia.com; david.march...@redhat.com;
> Richardson, Bruce ; jer...@marvell.com;
> ferruh.yi...@amd.com; Mcnamara, John ;
> Zhang, Helin ; techbo...@dpdk.or
From: Satheesh Paul
Currently PORT_ID action can redirect traffic only between
VFs of a PF. This patch extends PORT_ID action to redirect
traffic from one PF port to another PF port also.
Signed-off-by: Satheesh Paul
Reviewed-by: Kiran Kumar K
---
v2:
* Updated release notes.
doc/guides/rel_
Hi,
Replies are inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jiang, Cheng1
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2023 4:27 PM
> To: Amit Prakash Shukla ;
> tho...@monjalon.net; Richardson, Bruce ;
> m...@smartsharesystems.com; Xia, Chenbo
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Hu, Jiayu ; Ding, Xuan
> ; Ma, WenwuX ; Wang,
> Yu
From: Satheesh Paul
Currently PORT_ID action can redirect traffic only between
VFs of a PF. This patch extends PORT_ID action to redirect
traffic from one PF port to another PF port also.
Signed-off-by: Satheesh Paul
Reviewed-by: Kiran Kumar K
---
v2:
* Updated release notes.
v3:
* Rebased and
There are many high-performance DMA devices supported in DPDK now, and
these DMA devices can also be integrated into other modules of DPDK as
accelerators, such as Vhost. Before integrating DMA into applications,
developers need to know the performance of these DMA devices in various
scenarios and
From: Itamar Gozlan
Jumping to root (group 0) does not behave the same as jumping
to groups with level > 0.
To better emphasize that it is not the same action,
a rename is made to drop the name table.
Signed-off-by: Itamar Gozlan
---
drivers/net/mlx5/hws/mlx5dr.h| 11 ---
drive
Added hws send to kernel action and root tbl in mlx5_priv.
Initialized in hws configure and used in hws actions translate.
Signed-off-by: Bar Neuman
---
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h | 2 ++
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_hw.c | 59 +++--
2 files changed, 59 insertions
On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 2:14 PM Harman Kalra wrote:
>
> PF receives all the VFs mbox/flr messages which it forwards to AF.
> This is all handled by interrupt thread. Due to mbox locking in place
> a deadlock situation may arise which may lead to mbox timeout.
> Say at T1 - PF sends its own mbox to
On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 2:56 PM Vamsi Attunuru wrote:
>
> Patch optimizes transmit path for multi-seg packets
> by pre-allocating the gather list memory instead of
> allocating it in fast path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vamsi Attunuru
Updated the git commit as follows and applied to
dpdk-next-net-mrvl/f
On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 5:52 PM Nithin Dabilpuram
wrote:
>
> Add support for HW reassembly of multi-seg pkts.
> Also optimize the code for normal reassembly path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nithin Dabilpuram
Please resend the patch to run through all CI stages.
> ---
> drivers/event/cnxk/cn10k_worker.h
Hi,
Thanks for responding. Yes, perhaps my thought about being
vendor-neutral was a bit ridiculous, taking the P4 part of
the problem into account, and yet, this RFC does not use
suffix "p4" in API names, that is, it's not confined to
just P4. If that is the case, then PMDs that have fixed
pipeli
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 11:43 AM Rahul Bhansali wrote:
>
> Add a support of atomic fc check in poll mode Tx path. This atomic
> check is useful if multiple threads are using the same Tx queue.
> This will be enabled when Tx offload RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE
> is set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rahul B
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo