Hello
I wonder if anyone can suggest why previously working dpdk code may fail in
the Mellanox pmd code in dpdk-2.1.0, seemingly due to failure to create a
"resource domain" via ibv_exp_create_res_domain(). I must admit I haven't
seen that verb before, and it appears to be returning null with no e
.
>
>
> Original message
> From: Olga Shern
> Date:08/10/2015 7:55 AM (GMT+00:00)
> To: Bill O'Hara ,dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Mellanox PMD failure w/DPDK-2.1.0 and
> MLNX_OFED-3.1-1.0.3
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> There shouldn?t be
basic operation of
the upgraded OFED and firmware on those boxes.
Is there anything else we can check or confirm for you?
thanks
bill
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Bill O'Hara wrote:
> Hi Olga
>
> Firmware is version 2.35.5100. Configuration details below.
>
> Thanks for a
, right?
>
> We did test this combination (dpdk2.1 and ofed3.1-3)on hypervisor on the
> PF and also on VM on VF, but in fact, I didn?t try to run DPDK on the VFs
> on hypervisor, I will check this.
>
> Meanwhile, can you please send the output of the application on the start
&
>
> Another suggestion, can you please compile PMD with debug enabled, it may
> give more details ?
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Olga
>
>
>
> *From:* Bill O'Hara [mailto:billtohara at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Saturday, October 10, 2015 12:18 AM
> *To:* Olga Sher
I see from the Mellanox PMD release notes:
http://www.mellanox.com/related-docs/prod_software/Mellanox_ConnectX3_ConnectX3Pro_DPDK_PMD_Release_Notes_v1.7-8_2.8.4.pdf
that the primary and secondary multi-process model is not supported. Though
it's not noted as a limitation in the DPDK guide here:
6 matches
Mail list logo
