s I see for that entity are the Software Freedom Conservancy,
the Linux Foundation (although I suspect the cost structure would be too
high for what we need), Software in the Public Interest, or some new
non-profit we create just for DPDK. There are a few other options too.
But to evaluate the optio
t's important to have the voice of
users in the technical community, but I agree with Stephen that the TSC
would not be the appropriate forum for that.
Thanks,
Dave.
--
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338
herwise confidential information. If you
>> have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and
>> delete the original. Any other use of the e-mail by you is prohibited.
>> Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
>>
>>
>
--
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338
defined, but will definitely help with both the scaling
of project contributions and the diversity of the project.
The MAINTAINERS file: http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/MAINTAINERS is an
awesome step in the right direction by clearly defining where people
maintain a module.
Regards,
Dave.
--
Dave N
change management process for handling patches, and
instinctively I agree with you Neil that it would be a lot of overhead,
but it's an interesting thought exercise to think how it might work.
Thanks,
Dave.
--
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338
next Wednesday!
Thanks also to Mark Presti, who shared the Boston Software Networking
meet-up page with us to plan the event on meet-up!
https://www.meetup.com/BostonSoftwareNetworking/events/241390595/
Thank you all,
Dave.
--
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards
past. I think the project has made a lot of progress since I have
been following it, and I do not believe there are any major issues with
the independence of the project. However, there are still concerned
parties on this front, and the concerns can be easily addressed by a
move to the LF.
Regards,
the dpdk.org
domain name and management of the DNS, to ensure that the website and
community infrastructure were not beholden to a single project member -
is that still an issue?
Regards,
Dave.
--
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.re
community
* There is a preference for an independent project rather than being a
sub-project
Budget group:
* Matt Spencer, ARM
* Jerome Tollet, Cisco
* Ed Warnicke, Cisco
* Shreyansh Jain, NXP
* Dave Neary, Red Hat
* Jan Blunk, Brocade
* Vincent Jardin, 6WIND
* Thomas Monjalon, 6WIND
* Tim O'
track of when each 2.x release is due, and we don't have
> any criteria in place for moving to 3.x in future. Many people like the
> Ubuntu numbering scheme of Year.Month. Should we consider adopting that
> convention? If we move in future to a model where we have long-term support
/BostonSoftwareNetworking/events/243865692/
We will have 2-3 presentations, plus some social food and drink time.
If you are in the area, and available for the evening, we will start
things off at 6pm, and start presentations by 6:30pm.
Please sign up so that we have an idea of numbers!
Thanks,
Dave.
--
Dave
Italy : +39 0 247 92 12 39
> Netherlands : +31 (0) 208 080 379
> New Zealand : +64 9 442 7358
> Norway : +47 21 03 58 96
> Spain : +34 911 82 9782
> Sweden : +46 (0) 313 613 558
> Switzerland : +41 (0) 435 0006 96
> United Kingdom : +44 (0) 20 3713 5028
>
>
--
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338
ple and easy to understand.
> As usual, comments are welcome on the dev@ mailing list.
>
--
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338
ST UTC+2 hours
> Tel Aviv (Israel) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 6:00:00 PM IDT UTC+3 hours
> Moscow (Russia) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 6:00:00 PM MSK UTC+3 hours
> New Delhi (India - Delhi) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 8:30:00 PM IST UTC+5:30
> hours
> Shanghai (China - Shanghai Mun
er year (roughly one in 3 releases)
- 2 years maintenance after release (3 maintained branches in parallel
- 2 long-term, plus trunk)
Thanks,
Dave.
--
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338
x27;s notes, does this cover all of the conclusions
that came out of the meeting?
Thanks,
Dave.
On 10/11/2015 01:36 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I took some notes from a discussion we had at the end of DPDK Userspace
> in Dublin, concerning the growth and project structu
Hi,
On 10/13/2015 10:06 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> * Create a User Mailing List. - Needs support from 6Wind.
>
> OK
> Name: user at dpdk.org or other suggestion?
Other pages seem to have standardised on "users" - I don't think it
matters much, either is fine.
ion is good enough.
> If you feel some improvements are required to better help users and reduce
> the traffic of this list, do not hesitate to send a patch for the doc ;)
>
> If you have some patches to send or discuss, please use dev at dpdk.org.
>
> Welcome DPDK users!
>
ny comments, suggestions?
Thanks,
Dave.
--
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338
#x27;t volunteer to withdraw, what criteria can the
board use to request that they withdrawal?
One thing I think is important is that seats are not considered "owned"
by a company. There isn't a 6WIND seat or an Intel seat - seats are held
by individuals representing the intere
7;s scope
is limited to DPDK only, and the architecture board owns the scope of
DPDK, that we still have the open question of which projects are
appropriate to be housed under dpdk.org
There was a general agreement in Dublin that DPDK related projects and
applications could live in dpdk.org, but we
On 10/30/2015 09:25 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-10-30 13:23, O'Driscoll, Tim:
>> From: Dave Neary
>>> There was a general agreement in Dublin that DPDK related projects and
>>> applications could live in dpdk.org, but we didn't really touch on the
>&
didn't come to a conclusion on a voting model.
>
>
> I would propose that TSC should be elected at regular user summit from
> nominees;
> in a manner similar to LF Technical Advisory Board.
>
--
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338
15 12:44 PM, Bagh Fares wrote:
> As SOC vendor we will contribute heavily to the project. Example crypto
> acceleration. We already contribute a lot to the linux community.
> So not sure why the doubt about of contribution?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Da
ns: Clearwater IMS, FreeSWITCH, OpenSIPS, ...
> * NFV platform features: Service Function Chaining, fault management,
> dataplane acceleration, ...
>
> The announce by Dave Neary:
> https://lists.fosdem.org/pipermail/fosdem/2015-October/002282.html
>
> It is also a good opportunity
l allow either hardware or software encryption to be
> used. IKE will not be implemented so the SA/SP DBs will be statically
> configured.
Do you anticipate this application living in the dpdk repo, or in a
separate tree?
Thanks,
Dave.
--
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Sourc
050
> Italy : +39 0 693 38 75 50
> Netherlands : +31 (0) 208 080 208
> New Zealand : +64 9 925 0481
> Norway : +47 21 54 82 21
> Spain : +34 911 82 9890
> Sweden : +46 (0) 853 527 817
> Switzerland : +41 (0) 435 0167 65
> United Kingdom : +44 (0) 20 3713 5010
>
>
--
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338
also allow
people with old applications to update DPDK without having to modify
their applications.
Thanks,
Dave.
--
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338
t dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
>> Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 2:16 PM
>> To: dev at dpdk.org; Laura Kempke; Michael Dolan
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation
>>
>> Here are some brief minutes of our discussion on Tuesday.
ust/023012.html
I may have misunderstood Seth's comment, but it looked like he was
talking about checking errno after fopen and reporting the error with
perror or strerror in the event of a non-zero return.
Seth, did I understand correctly?
Thanks,
Dave.
--
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Stra
30 matches
Mail list logo
