X710 RSS working on one vmare setup bit not working on another

2024-08-02 Thread chetan bhasin
Hi All, We are facing issue with X710 + SRIOV. Some how packets coming to queue 0 only . Same Nic sriov are shared between a vm using dpdk and other vm using Linux interfaces. Can anyone provide any direction? We are using vpp 2106 with dpdk 2102. I know it’s old but any hint might help. Thank

Photon OS + MLX not coming up

2023-05-12 Thread chetan bhasin
Hi, We are using DPDK version β€œ*21.02*” and facing issue while doing port start of MLX (ConnectX-4 Lx Virtual Function) *:0b:00.0 'MT27710 Family [ConnectX-4 Lx Virtual Function]* 1016' if=eth2 drv=mlx5_core unused= *Photon kernel version* - 4.19.277-3.ph3 *Firmware version – * ]#

DPDK compatible driver sheet for VMWARE

2024-06-19 Thread chetan bhasin
Hi All, Do we have a compatible sheet for E810 Nic Environment - Vmware Driver - native vmware DPDK versions Thanks, Chetan

DPDK KNI problem

2023-08-21 Thread chetan bhasin
Hello DPDK mentors, We are facing an issue, KNI core stuck after 4-5 days of traffic. Can anybody guide us on this? We have set isolcpu, rcu_nocbs in grub for given cores. Aug 22 01:38:29 kernel: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU { 2} (t=60001 jiffies g=426362199 c=426362198 q=150932)

DPDK KNI problem

2023-08-22 Thread chetan bhasin
Hello DPDK mentors, We are facing an issue, KNI core stuck after 4-5 days of traffic. Can anybody guide us on this? We have set isolcpu, rcu_nocbs in grub for given cores. Aug 22 01:38:29 kernel: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU { 2} (t=60001 jiffies g=426362199 c=426362198 q=150932)

Vmware i40en compatibility matrix with DPDK version

2024-03-15 Thread chetan bhasin
Hello Everyone, Can anybody please share the compatibility matrix for i40en (Vmware native driver) with the DPDK version. I am trying XL710 nic card 10G dual port but facing issues. 2024/03/15 10:06:12:842 notice dpdk iavf_configure_queues(): RXDID[22] is not supported, request defa

[dpdk-dev] Can we run KNI under a container

2021-05-27 Thread chetan bhasin
Hello Everyone, We can run dpdk app with KNI on container with below options - * --network host --privileged* -v /sys/bus/pci/drivers:/sys/bus/pci/drivers -v /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages:/sys/kernel/mm/hugepages -v /sys/devices/system/node:/sys/devices/system/node -v /dev:/dev Is there any way we cou

Re: [dpdk-dev] Can we run KNI under a container /Kubernetes POD

2021-06-02 Thread chetan bhasin
--config="(0,13,13,13)"* * Thanks,* *Chetan* On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 11:59 AM chetan bhasin wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > We can run dpdk app with KNI on container with below options - > * --network host --privileged* -v > /sys/bus/pci/drivers:/sys/bus/pci/drivers -v > /

[dpdk-dev] DPDK 17.11.4 (Madvise)Transparent Huge pages

2019-01-02 Thread chetan bhasin
Hi, I am using DPDK 17.11.4 version . Do anybody have idea that DPDK is using benefit of Transparent huge-pages in case of Madvise. Thanks, Chetan Bhasin

Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK 17.11.4 (Madvise)Transparent Huge pages

2019-01-08 Thread chetan bhasin
Thanks Anatoly On Tue, Jan 8, 2019, 16:01 Burakov, Anatoly On 02-Jan-19 3:31 PM, chetan bhasin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am using DPDK 17.11.4 version . Do anybody have idea that DPDK is using > > benefit of Transparent huge-pages in case of Madvise. > > > >

[dpdk-dev] Getting issue while bringin Bond with VMXNET3 (DPDK 17.11)

2018-10-06 Thread chetan bhasin
Hi Dpdk Champs, I am facing an issue while bringing bonding on VM having vmxnet3 interfaces. Below error is coming in the log - PMD: bond_ethdev_start(1959) - bonded port (2) failed to reconfigure slave device (0). Please suggest. Thanks, Chetan Bhasin

[dpdk-dev] Getting issue while bringin Bond with VMXNET3 (DPDK 17.11)

2018-10-06 Thread chetan bhasin
Can anybody suggest? Stuck right now! On Sat, Oct 6, 2018, 17:02 chetan bhasin wrote: > Hi Dpdk Champs, > > I am facing an issue while bringing bonding on VM having vmxnet3 > interfaces. > > Below error is coming in the log - > > PMD: bond_ethdev_start(1959) - b

Re: [dpdk-dev] Getting issue while bringin Bond with VMXNET3 (DPDK 17.11)

2018-10-08 Thread chetan bhasin
D_INIT_LOG(ERR, "SCTP checksum offload not supported"); return -EINVAL; } Regards, Chetan Bhasin On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 7:11 AM Chas Williams <3ch...@gmail.com> wrote: > Any other error messages? There's really only one path out of > slave_configu

Re: [dpdk-dev] Getting issue while bringin Bond with VMXNET3 (DPDK 17.11)

2018-10-09 Thread chetan bhasin
Thanks a lot Let me check in vpp's DPDK plugin what value is passed. Thanks, Chetan Bhasin On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 1:35 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 10/9/2018 5:35 AM, chetan bhasin wrote: > > Thanks for your reply . > > > > The issue coming in function &

[dpdk-dev] Issue with DPDK bonding with Mellanox

2018-10-31 Thread chetan bhasin
for bonded device eth_bond0 Oct 31 13:13:07 - INFO - vdev_probe(): failed to initialize eth_bond0 device Thanks, Chetan Bhasin

Re: [dpdk-dev] Issue with DPDK bonding with Mellanox

2018-11-01 Thread chetan bhasin
Hi Matan, Thanks for your reply. I have not removed Mellanox interfaces those were still up in linux domain . Thanks, Chetan Bhasin On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 3:20 PM Matan Azrad wrote: > Hi Chetan > > From: chetan bhasin > > Hi, > > > > We are using Dpdk 17.11.4 a

[dpdk-dev] How to use mlx4 as bond

2019-03-26 Thread chetan bhasin
. Is bonding just not possible using the two interfaces on this device? Thanks, Chetan Bhasin

[dpdk-dev] Using X722 Nic with dpdk 17.11.5 version

2020-04-21 Thread chetan bhasin
Hi, Could anybody please provide a link/reference that mention X722 NIc driver version , firmware version compatibility with Dpdk 17.11.5. This would be a great help. Thanks, Chetan

[dpdk-dev] Facing issue with mellanox after increasing number of buffers

2020-02-20 Thread chetan bhasin
Hi, We are using DPDK underneath VPP . We are facing issue when we increase buffers from 100k to 300k after upgrading vpp version (18.01--> 19.08). As per log following error is seen net_mlx5: port %u unable to find virtually contiguous chunk for address (%p). rte_memseg_contig_walk() failed.\n%.0

[dpdk-dev] Regarding ENIC driver dpdk 17.11.4 vs dpdk 19.05

2020-03-11 Thread chetan bhasin
Hi, We are using VPP , which internally using dpdk. *With vpp 18.01(dpdk 17.11.4)* : Whenever we set MTU of interface as 1500 , we can get 1500 size of untagged and tagged packet. *With vpp 19.0.5* (dpdk 19.05) : Whenever we set mtu as 1500 , we have seen issue with vlan packets, those are not e

[dpdk-dev] Do we support fail_over_mac=1 (active) as dpdk bonding option

2019-11-12 Thread chetan bhasin
ailover. Appreciate your response . Thanks, Chetan Bhasin

Re: [dpdk-dev] Dpdk version 17.11.4 (i40e) switchover is not working

2019-07-11 Thread chetan bhasin
ody please provide a direction towards which patch I should look into , as there are lots of changes between dpdk-17.11.4 and dpdk-18.11.2. I have tried some patches related to i40e driver but no success yet. Thanks & Regards, Chetan Bhasin On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 7:51 PM chetan bhasin w

[dpdk-dev] Dpdk version 17.11.4 (i40e) switchover is not working

2019-07-04 Thread chetan bhasin
Hello folks, I am using dpdk 17.11.4 version , it's a bare metal server with intel X722 nic with firm-ware version 4.0. The problem is switch-over is not working, looks like dpdk is not able to get link down trigger. Can anybody guide us please . Thanks, Chetan Bhasin

Re: [dpdk-dev] kernel crash with DPDK 18.11

2019-07-05 Thread chetan bhasin
Hi Souvik, I am also facing this issue on DPDK 17.11.4 but not sure whether it is because of fragmented traffic or not. Are you able to get the direction regarding this issue? Can you please guide. Thanks, Chetan Bhasin On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 12:00 AM Dey, Souvik wrote: > Hi

[dpdk-dev] mbuf in chain buffer has packet len as 0 , will it impact TX?

2019-09-01 Thread chetan bhasin
Hello Everyone, I have a use case where one of the buffer in a chain has packet-len 0 , Can anybody suggest whether it will cause a problem while doing a TX ? Thanks, Chetan Bhasin

[dpdk-dev] process got Sigsegv with Multi KNI

2021-01-04 Thread chetan bhasin
Hello DevTeam members, We have a dpdk application where we are using multiple KNI's as slaves under a linux virtual interface which is acting as master. When process got SIGSEGV , we are seeing that process remains in defunct state and linux kernel is trying to release those slave interfaces in ba