Re: [DISCUSS] Renaming the RecordBatch interface

2014-12-22 Thread Yash Sharma
Hi Jason, I vote for the name *BatchIterator* which instantly brings a notion of an iterator over a underlying data. Having next method in an iterator also make perfect sense and in general everyone is much familiar with this naming convention as well. Yash On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Jason

Re: [DISCUSS] Renaming the RecordBatch interface

2014-12-19 Thread Jason Altekruse
bump On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Jason Altekruse wrote: > Hello Drillers, > > I am currently working on trying to write documentation to describe our > current interface and implementation patterns used in RecordBatch and its > subclasses. These classes currently contain the implementations

[DISCUSS] Renaming the RecordBatch interface

2014-12-05 Thread Jason Altekruse
Hello Drillers, I am currently working on trying to write documentation to describe our current interface and implementation patterns used in RecordBatch and its subclasses. These classes currently contain the implementations of all of our physical operators, subclasses include FilterRecordBatch,