+1
--
发件人：Jason Altekruse
发送时间：2021年8月31日(星期二) 19:22
收件人：dev
主 题：Re: [VOTE] Add LGTM to Drill Pull Requests
+1
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021, 2:44 AM James Turton
wrote:
> If there are no unpleasant side effects then it sounds lik
+1
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021, 2:44 AM James Turton
wrote:
> If there are no unpleasant side effects then it sounds like a good idea
> to me +1.
>
> On 2021/08/30 23:23, Charles Givre wrote:
> > Hello Drill Devs,
> > I’d like to call a vote as to whether we add LGTM automated code check
> to our pull
If there are no unpleasant side effects then it sounds like a good idea
to me +1.
On 2021/08/30 23:23, Charles Givre wrote:
Hello Drill Devs,
I’d like to call a vote as to whether we add LGTM automated code check to our
pull requests. This would not replace the current review process, but ra
+1
> 在 2021年8月31日，05:23，Charles Givre 写道：
>
> Hello Drill Devs,
> I’d like to call a vote as to whether we add LGTM automated code check to our
> pull requests. This would not replace the current review process, but
> rather add a quality check to new code. I seem to recall us voting on
Hello Drill Devs,
I’d like to call a vote as to whether we add LGTM automated code check to our
pull requests. This would not replace the current review process, but rather
add a quality check to new code. I seem to recall us voting on this before,
but I couldn’t find the email, so I apologi
