Re: Druid configuration documentation should not be organized in tables

2019-03-05 Thread Eyal Yurman
Just for comparison, this looks nice, isn't it? https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/configuration.html Original .md: https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/docs/configuration.md On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 3:20 PM Clint Wylie wrote: > I definitely agree that a lot of these configuration option

Re: Druid configuration documentation should not be organized in tables

2019-03-05 Thread Clint Wylie
I definitely agree that a lot of these configuration option docs have outgrown the tables. I do however think the giant table as a reference to lookup configuration property names and default values is handy; I think maybe a system of links in the tables, like "see coordinator balancing docs for

Re: Proposed website migration plan

2019-03-05 Thread David Lim
Who has control over the druid.io domain? Charles would that be you? We'd need support from them for the DNS redirect. On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 2:04 PM Jonathan Wei wrote: > We still need to complete the website migration to Apache infrastructure. > > I'll propose the following plan: > >

Proposed website migration plan

2019-03-05 Thread Jonathan Wei
We still need to complete the website migration to Apache infrastructure. I'll propose the following plan: Proposed Apache Druid website migration plan These links have some previous discussion on the website migration:

Re: Upcoming podling report

2019-03-05 Thread Jonathan Wei
I've changed the status to "Nearing graduation" and updated the incubator wiki. Thanks, Jon On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 10:42 AM David Lim wrote: > +1 on 'Nearing graduation' > > Thank you for handling this. The recent metrics are impressive! > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 4:04 PM Gian Merlino wrote:

Re: docker build

2019-03-05 Thread Charles Allen
I would support that. On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 11:13 AM David Glasser wrote: > Is the following a reasonable solution from both a usability and > legal perspective? > - Write a Dockerfile that has everything except the GPL jar on it > (including the Druid code that talks to the jar if configured

Re: docker build

2019-03-05 Thread David Glasser
Is the following a reasonable solution from both a usability and legal perspective? - Write a Dockerfile that has everything except the GPL jar on it (including the Druid code that talks to the jar if configured to use MySQL) - Automatically publish that Docker image to the ASF account on

Re: Upcoming podling report

2019-03-05 Thread David Lim
+1 on 'Nearing graduation' Thank you for handling this. The recent metrics are impressive! On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 4:04 PM Gian Merlino wrote: > I think it's fair to say that the community is strong already, and we are > "Nearing graduation". > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 2:58 PM Jonathan Wei

Re: docker build

2019-03-05 Thread Charles Allen
Honestly we're at a very strange impasse. On one hand I don't think the ASF project can adopt an official docker image unless ASF legal says its ok. "Official" releases are source code anyways (as my understanding goes), and binary artifacts are convenience things. Unfortunately I do not see a

Re: docker build

2019-03-05 Thread Charles Allen
haha, sorry, I mean I agree with Don On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 9:37 AM Charles Allen wrote: > I agree with Gian on this sentiment. > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 7:47 AM Don Bowman wrote: > >> On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 19:14, Gaurav Bhatnagar >> wrote: >> >> > I have been thinking if automated scripts

Re: docker build

2019-03-05 Thread Charles Allen
I agree with Gian on this sentiment. On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 7:47 AM Don Bowman wrote: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 19:14, Gaurav Bhatnagar wrote: > > > I have been thinking if automated scripts can be provided to end users in > > Druid for "Additional Dependencies" for user initiated installation

Re: docker build

2019-03-05 Thread Don Bowman
where do we stand on this? the PR is in and accepted, but i feel we need to have this built as part of the release artifacts and on dockerhub to foster adoption. if the only issue is the mysql connector i can remove it in favour of the postgres connector. On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 13:58, Don Bowman

Re: Incubator report

2019-03-05 Thread Gian Merlino
Jon Wei posted a draft in another thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4e84f8802ee1f66fd0d2d6c04a5a9df26c803dfc02eee56877e15ed4@%3Cdev.druid.apache.org%3E On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 2:24 AM Julian Hyde wrote: > Hi Druid PPMC, > > The March incubator report is due tomorrow. Is someone

Incubator report

2019-03-05 Thread Julian Hyde
Hi Druid PPMC, The March incubator report is due tomorrow. Is someone working on it? Julian https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2019