as
> parallel combining threads enabled.
>
> I assume you enabled parallel combining in GroupByMergingQueryRunnerV2
> (it's disabled by default). Then, it's difficult to tell where you gained
> the benefit. You might ned to run more benchmarks to figure out.
>
> Best,
> Jihoon
>
>
s are using Sequence, and thus using another stuff for a specific
> query type might make the codes complicated. I think we need to avoid it if
> possible.
>
> Best,
> Jihoon
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 2:58 PM Jihoon Son wrote:
>
> > Hi Jisoo,
> >
> > the
Hi all,
I am currently working on a project that uses Druid's QueryRunner and other
druid-processing classes. It uses Druid's own classes to calculate query
results. I have been testing large GroupBy queries (using v2), and it seems
like parallel combining threads for GroupBy queries are only enab
