Re: [DISCUSS] Druid 28 dropping support for Hadoop 2

2023-06-29 Thread rahul gidwani
+1 drop hadoop 2. On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 12:50 PM Xavier Léauté wrote: > +1, does this mean we would mark Hadoop 2 deprecated in Druid 27? > > Also, do we have a broader plan to remove Hadoop in general from core > dependencies and make a an optional extension? > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 11:53

Re: [DISCUSS] Druid 25.0 release

2022-10-26 Thread rahul gidwani
What about the mm-less patch? That would be nice to have in this next release? Rahul --- Original Message --- On Wednesday, October 26th, 2022 at 9:13 AM, Kashif Faraz wrote: > Hello > > On the 16th of September, we released Druid 24.0.0 which was a major > milestone in our journ

Re: Next Druid release version scheme

2022-07-06 Thread rahul gidwani
ackwards compatibility guarantees are. What I'd like us to avoid > is to be further entrenched and bogged down in > moving away from those dependencies by declaring a stable API. > > Xavier > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 2:45 PM rahul gidwani > wrote: > > Hi Gian, this is

Re: Next Druid release version scheme

2022-06-06 Thread rahul gidwani
Druid release would have an associated Extension API version, and a > list of supported Query API versions that users could choose between on a > per-query basis.) > > Rahul, I wonder what you think about this idea? What kinds of compatibility > are most important to you? >

Re: Next Druid release version scheme

2022-05-27 Thread rahul gidwani
I would say that semantic versioning for me is very important for determining compatibility between releases. Minor versions should always adhere to being compatible with each other and a major version bump is where you can potentially break it. Right now calling it 24.0 is fine, but what would t

Re: [DISCUSS] Druid 0.23 release

2022-05-26 Thread rahul gidwani
What about a 1.0 release? I think there is no backwards compatibility promised until Druid gets to 1.0+. I think it would be really helpful to customers to start making upgrades rollable and guaranteeing compatibility between minor versions. Any plans for this to happen in the near future? >

Re: [E] [DISCUSS] Patch to fix new vulnerabilities in log4j

2021-12-20 Thread rahul gidwani
agreed, at most companies they do a vulnerability scan of the libs to see if you have the right version. On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 11:36 AM Pries, John E wrote: > Can I humbly recommend a quick patch to log4j2.17.0? The reason is > security organizations don't know from application to application

compression strategy concurrency

2021-09-14 Thread rahul gidwani
What is the desired thread safety of the CompressionStrategy class? From looking at it from an API perspective, it looks to be you: Allocate input buffer, Allocate output buffer, compress / decompress. The CompressionStrategyTest.testConcurrency() test if you bump the number of threads to 100, a