I think "Idea" is too vague. I think it's OK to re-label most
"Contributions Welcome" to "Starter", but "Contributions Welcome" could
remain.
On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 at 03:46, Vadim Ogievetsky
wrote:
> Ok I will remove the Difficulty labels and repurpose "Easy" to "Starter"
> unless anyone objects
Ok I will remove the Difficulty labels and repurpose "Easy" to "Starter" unless
anyone objects within 24h.
On 2019/10/09 06:30:06, Gian Merlino wrote:
> That is definitely a good property for starter issues (not needing a
> production cluster to validate).
>
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 12:01 AM
Vadim, the idea of removing the Difficulty labels and repurposing "Easy"
for intro issues sounds good to me. It sounds like "Starter" as you
envision it is a subset of "Contributions Welcome" as Roman envisions it. I
wonder if there is some way we can align these better.
It looks like _most_ of
That is definitely a good property for starter issues (not needing a
production cluster to validate).
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 12:01 AM Roman Leventov
wrote:
> I don't use "Contributions Welcome" exclusively for starter issues. I do
> _not_ put this label though on issues that are impossible or
I don't use "Contributions Welcome" exclusively for starter issues. I do
_not_ put this label though on issues that are impossible or hard to
validate without a production cluster (with specific type of load,
perhaps). So the assumption is that anyone just with a laptop and IDE could
contribute
Hi all,
I would like to organize a set of issues (via a label) that are good starting
points for someone wanting to contribute to Druid.
I want to have the link to the issues filtered on that label to be part of the
README.
This would encourage people new to Druid to contribute and get involved
