Fwd: Legal implications of using JMH

2018-04-23 Thread Owen O'Malley
message -- From: Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> Date: Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 3:12 PM Subject: Re: Legal implications of using JMH To: dev@druid.apache.org, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org> Cc: Slim Bouguerra <sbougue...@hortonworks.com>, Gian Merlino < g...@apache.org>

Re: Legal implications of using JMH

2018-04-23 Thread Julian Hyde
nked to from Apache projects at all. The problem is > that the GPL is viral and you’d have to license the rest of the code under > the GPL. > > .. Owen > > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Gian Merlino <g...@apache.org<mailto:g...@apache.org>> > Subject:

Re: Legal implications of using JMH

2018-04-23 Thread Julian Hyde
I agree with Gian. Calcite uses JMH. We don’t distribute the binaries it produces — because we only need them for running benchmarks. It’s not an identical situation to MySQL because while there are other implementations of JDBC — e.g. Postgres — there is only one implementation of JMH. But