Hi folks,
Today I noticed there's one pull request 2699 (dubbo Add a new
serialization -gson) [1] pending for review. I'm hesitate to move it in
since we've already had fastjson serialization support which serves the
same purpose.
I'd like to hear your opinion on this.
Thanks,
-Ian.
1. https:/
For same purpose I prefer to have only one implement.
And for fastjson and gson, it's hard to make decision which one is better,
since we already had fastjson in master, gson support can be part of ecosystem
but not in master
On 2018/10/29 09:46:26, Ian Luo wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Today I no
Agree with u.
The serialization method of json is also much slower than hessian and kryo,
and the data is relatively large. We don't have to support all json
serialization. But just put it into ecosystem.
YunKun Huang 于2018年11月1日周四 上午10:17写道：
> For same purpose I prefer to have only one implemen
I failed to get response from the original author. I plan to revise his
impl and put it in eco system, to provide community an alternative on json
support. I hope the original author can come back to work with me together
later.
-Ian.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 10:21 AM yuhang xiu wrote:
> Agree wi
I've checked in gson support to
https://github.com/dubbo/dubbo-serialization-gson. I also left message on
the original pull request to invite the original author to join. Hope he
can give me a reply soon.
Regards,
-Ian.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 10:46 AM Ian Luo wrote:
> I failed to get response f
Great to have a new serialization extension!
> I'm hesitate to move it in
> since we've already had fastjson serialization support which serves the
> same purpose.
Thanks to Dubbo’s SPI, we can extend as many serialization protocol as we want.
I think the existing fastjson should never be the re
