Re: Need > JDK 5 profile in pom

2007-07-02 Thread Richard S. Hall
Marcel Offermans wrote: On Jul 2, 2007, at 20:20 , Richard S. Hall wrote: stephane frenot wrote: I will have a look at this tomorrow, I think MOSGi should compile with jdk 1.4 It never has...java.management is not in JDK 1.4...right? For 1.4 you could compile against MX4J. That would mean

Re: Need > JDK 5 profile in pom

2007-07-02 Thread Marcel Offermans
On Jul 2, 2007, at 20:20 , Richard S. Hall wrote: stephane frenot wrote: I will have a look at this tomorrow, I think MOSGi should compile with jdk 1.4 It never has...java.management is not in JDK 1.4...right? For 1.4 you could compile against MX4J. That would mean adding something like a

Re: Need > JDK 5 profile in pom

2007-07-02 Thread Richard S. Hall
stephane frenot wrote: I will have a look at this tomorrow, I think MOSGi should compile with jdk 1.4 It never has...java.management is not in JDK 1.4...right? -> richard /stephane 2007/7/2, Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: After Stephane converted the MOSGi bundles to the new plugin

Re: Need > JDK 5 profile in pom

2007-07-02 Thread stephane frenot
I will have a look at this tomorrow, I think MOSGi should compile with jdk 1.4 /stephane 2007/7/2, Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: After Stephane converted the MOSGi bundles to the new plugin and added them to the appropriate plugin profile, the maven-bundle-plugin profile now won't compi

Need > JDK 5 profile in pom

2007-07-02 Thread Richard S. Hall
After Stephane converted the MOSGi bundles to the new plugin and added them to the appropriate plugin profile, the maven-bundle-plugin profile now won't compile with JDK 1.4 since MOSGi requires > JDK 5. I would assume that we need to create subprofiles for the maven-bundle-plugin profile to g

[jira] Commented: (FELIX-316) Configuration Admin should use the bundle data storage area by default.

2007-07-02 Thread Karl Pauls (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509567 ] Karl Pauls commented on FELIX-316: -- I think I prefer the first solution but I don't care to much as long as the bund

[jira] Commented: (FELIX-316) Configuration Admin should use the bundle data storage area by default.

2007-07-02 Thread Felix Meschberger (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509557 ] Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-316: - Sounds reasonable. Just for clarification on my part: Currently th

[jira] Assigned: (FELIX-316) Configuration Admin should use the bundle data storage area by default.

2007-07-02 Thread Felix Meschberger (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Felix Meschberger reassigned FELIX-316: --- Assignee: Felix Meschberger > Configuration Admin should use the bundle data storage a

Maven-bundle-plugin observations

2007-07-02 Thread Hampel, Michael
Hello, after working a while now with the maven-bundle-plugin I would like to share some observations and ask questions about them. I am using the plugin in my poms for running to goals: manifest and bundle. In certain cases these two goals produce two different MANIFEST.MF files as regards co

[jira] Created: (FELIX-316) Configuration Admin should use the bundle data storage area by default.

2007-07-02 Thread Karl Pauls (JIRA)
Configuration Admin should use the bundle data storage area by default. --- Key: FELIX-316 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-316 Project: Felix Issue Type: Im