Karl Pauls wrote:
> I have to admit that I didn't follow the progress of commons that
> closely (so it's great that we see progress again!). I do remember
> however that there was some concern about the idea some while back
> about the problem that some of the wrapped projects might not work
> prop
Karl Pauls wrote:
> I just called a vote on the two needed artifacts. Personally, I'm not
> sure this is really needed because we voted on the source releases and
> somehow I'd say that the resulting artifacts are covered as well but
> it seemed quicker to just vote on them again.
>
It is needed -
Karl Pauls wrote:
>> putting our releases up to the maven repository was a little bit work,
>> as I had to create the correct directory structure by hand and (more
>> important) had to extract the pom files for the various artifacts,
>> create md5s and sign them.
>
> On this subject, would you min
[X] +1 Approve the Felix 1.0.0 framework and main binary releases.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[X] +1 Approve the Felix 1.0.0 framework and main binary releases.
Didier
On Tuesday 07 August 2007 17:18, Karl Pauls wrote:
> Does that make it more clear?
Perhaps ;o)
Hasn't 72 hours voting period long past... just kidding.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; ht
> Hi,
>
> I am looking at the two binaries to be released. The only difference I can see
> is;
>
> a) Main contains the Main class and th Main-Class manifest entry.
>
> b) The Framework has a ExportPackage manifest entry.
>
> Maybe I missed something, but is it worthwhile to maintain two such sim
Hi,
I am looking at the two binaries to be released. The only difference I can see
is;
a) Main contains the Main class and th Main-Class manifest entry.
b) The Framework has a ExportPackage manifest entry.
Maybe I missed something, but is it worthwhile to maintain two such similar
artifact
On 8/7/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 August 2007 05:12, Karl Pauls wrote:
> > On this subject, would you mind if I replace your signature with our
> > release key signature?
>
> The KEYS file will contain multiple keys over time, as release manager will
> both be var
On 8/7/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 August 2007 05:00, Karl Pauls wrote:
> > I would like to call a vote on the framework and main binaries in
> > order to make them available via maven. The jar artifacts, the
> > signature files, and MD5 message digests are availab
10 matches
Mail list logo
