Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix EventAdmin 1.2.10

2011-03-06 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Guillaume Nodet wrote > +1 but isn't the LICENSE.sun file supposed to be included at the end > of the LICENSE file ? > Yes, we should do this for the next release. Thanks Carsten > On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:10, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We solved 2 issues in this release (the bug ha

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix EventAdmin 1.2.10

2011-03-06 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Clement Escoffier wrote > Hi, > > +1, > > I just have a question about: > This product includes software developed at > Sun Microsystems, Inc. > Copyright (c) 1994-2000. > Licensed under a BSD license. > > > This snippet is in DEPENDENCIES (in I. Included Third-Party Software) but > not in the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix EventAdmin 1.2.10

2011-03-06 Thread Clement Escoffier
Hi, +1, I just have a question about: This product includes software developed at Sun Microsystems, Inc. Copyright (c) 1994-2000. Licensed under a BSD license. This snippet is in DEPENDENCIES (in I. Included Third-Party Software) but not in the NOTICE. Don't we also need it in the NOTICE ? Reg

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix EventAdmin 1.2.10

2011-03-06 Thread Rob Walker
+1 --Original Message-- From: Carsten Ziegeler To: dev@felix.apache.org ReplyTo: dev@felix.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix EventAdmin 1.2.10 Sent: Mar 4, 2011 12:10 Hi, We solved 2 issues in this release (the bug has been introduced with the 1.2.2 release): https://issu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix EventAdmin 1.2.10

2011-03-06 Thread jb
+1 (non binding) Regards JB --Original Message-- From: Carsten Ziegeler To: dev@felix.apache.org ReplyTo: dev@felix.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix EventAdmin 1.2.10 Sent: Mar 4, 2011 12:10 Hi, We solved 2 issues in this release (the bug has been introduced with the 1.2.2