Re: OSGi split tool for Java project in Eclipse

Hi Peter, I have update my project proposal [1] and submit it into GSoC system, its URL in GSoC web site is [2], looking for more advises and feedbacks from you :-) Thank You [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2899 [2] http://socghop.appspot.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2011

[jira] [Updated] (FELIX-2899) [GSoc 2011]Bndtools based OSGi bundles maker project

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tiger Gui updated FELIX-2899: - Description: OSGi(Open Service Gateway Initiative) is a worldwide consortium of technology innovators th

[jira] [Updated] (FELIX-2899) [GSoc 2011]Bndtools based OSGi bundles maker project

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tiger Gui updated FELIX-2899: - Description: OSGi(Open Service Gateway Initiative) is a worldwide consortium of technology innovators th

[jira] [Commented] (FELIX-2899) [GSoc 2011]Bndtools based OSGi bundles maker project

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13014390#comment-13014390 ] Tiger Gui commented on FELIX-2899: -- Hi all, you can go here http://code.google.com/p/osgi

Re: Felix 3.2.0 the direct followup to 3.0.9 ?

3.0.9 had the new error messages. 3.2.0 includes changes to the resolver that may introduce different but correct behavior, thus the version bump. Toni Menzel wrote: Hi, I haven't really kept track of the 3.1/3.2 stuff in Felix, so is it true that 3.2 is the followup of 3.0.9 ? I understand 3

Re: [VOTE] Apache Felix Log Service 1.0.1 (2nd attempt)

+1 regards, Karl On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Clement Escoffier wrote: > +1, > > One very minor thing: > The DEPENDENCIES file is using 'III. License Summary' instead of 'III. > Overall License Summary' (as defined on > http://felix.apache.org/site/dependencies-file-template.html) > > Regar

Re: Felix 3.2.0 the direct followup to 3.0.9 ?

Yes, it is. As always, we might do a 3.0.10++ if need be (probably only if there is a request for the backport of a critical bug) but otherwise, we now switch to 3.2.x. regards, Karl On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Toni Menzel wrote: > Hi, > > I haven't really kept track of the 3.1/3.2 stuff

Re: [VOTE] Felix framework 3.2.0 and related subproject releases

+1 (non binding) On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Toni Menzel wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> >> On 03/30/2011 09:09 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Carsten >>> >>> Rob Wal

Felix 3.2.0 the direct followup to 3.0.9 ?

Hi, I haven't really kept track of the 3.1/3.2 stuff in Felix, so is it true that 3.2 is the followup of 3.0.9 ? I understand 3.2 is the first release with the new resolver/diagnostics karma ? -- *Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com*

Re: [VOTE] Felix framework 3.2.0 and related subproject releases

+1 (non binding) On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Regards > JB > > > On 03/30/2011 09:09 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Carsten >> >> Rob Walker wrote >> >>> +1 >>> >>> -- Rob >>> >>> On 28/03/2011 10:54 PM, Karl Pauls wrote: >>>

[jira] [Updated] (FELIX-2899) [GSoc 2011]Bndtools based OSGi bundles maker project

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tiger Gui updated FELIX-2899: - Description: OSGi(Open Service Gateway Initiative) is a worldwide consortium of technology innovators th