Hi Guillaume,
Does gogo-runtime have a dependency on gogo-jline or will it work without?
Just trying to understand what Java 7 users will be able to do/are missing
without gogo-jline...
On the version number, if the refactoring was just a change of internal
implementation details without any API
2016-10-04 9:16 GMT+02:00 David Bosschaert :
> Hi Guillaume,
>
> Does gogo-runtime have a dependency on gogo-jline or will it work without?
> Just trying to understand what Java 7 users will be able to do/are missing
> without gogo-jline...
>
No, the dependency is from gogo-jline to gogo-runtime.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15544990#comment-15544990
]
Ferry Huberts commented on FELIX-5261:
--
Ok, investigated these changes:
org.osgi.ser
On 10/4/16 04:13 , Guillaume Nodet wrote:
2016-10-04 9:16 GMT+02:00 David Bosschaert :
Hi Guillaume,
Does gogo-runtime have a dependency on gogo-jline or will it work without?
Just trying to understand what Java 7 users will be able to do/are missing
without gogo-jline...
No, the dependenc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15545246#comment-15545246
]
Fabian Lange commented on FELIX-5247:
-
actually I might be mistaken, because the chang
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15545586#comment-15545586
]
Dmitry Konstantinov commented on FELIX-5247:
yes, I think changes are related
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15547748#comment-15547748
]
Fabian Lange commented on FELIX-5247:
-
you are correct, the org.apache.felix.resolver.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15547797#comment-15547797
]
Fabian Lange commented on FELIX-5247:
-
actually there is another resolver created here
I came up with the following extension:
https://github.com/apache/karaf/blob/master/features/extension/src/main/java/org/apache/karaf/features/extension/Activator.java
It seems to work correctly so far. I suppose it would be even faster to
have it in the framework to avoid going through the reso
Karl Pauls wrote
> Hm, I think we are running into on of the NOTICE in the root of the bundle
> svn issues again.
>
> Both, Bridge and Jetty do not get their NOTICE copied into their binary jar
> causing the somewhat awkward situation that the source artifacts have a
> NOTICE claiming they contain
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15547843#comment-15547843
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on FELIX-5247:
One simple way would be to add a configur
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15547851#comment-15547851
]
Fabian Lange commented on FELIX-5247:
-
yes that would be the ideal situation, but I fe
12 matches
Mail list logo