Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Http Base 3.0.16, Http Bridge 3.0.16, and Http Jetty 3.4.0

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Clement Escoffier < clement.escoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1, > > Regards, > > Clement > > On 5 oct. 2016, at 07:02, Karl Pauls wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > regards, > > > > Karl > > > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Carsten

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Http Base 3.0.16, Http Bridge 3.0.16, and Http Jetty 3.4.0

+1, Regards, Clement > On 5 oct. 2016, at 07:02, Karl Pauls wrote: > > +1 > > regards, > > Karl > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Carsten Ziegeler > wrote: > >> I would like to call a vote on the following subproject releases: >> >> Http Base

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Http Base 3.0.16, Http Bridge 3.0.16, and Http Jetty 3.4.0

+1 regards, Karl On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > I would like to call a vote on the following subproject releases: > > Http Base 3.0.16 (2 issues) > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12338092 > > Http Bridge 3.0.16 (2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Http Base 3.0.16, Http Bridge 3.0.16, and Http Jetty 3.4.0

+1 David On 5 October 2016 at 12:25, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > I would like to call a vote on the following subproject releases: > > Http Base 3.0.16 (2 issues) > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12338092 > > Http Bridge 3.0.16 (2 issues) >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Http Base 3.0.16, Http Bridge 3.0.16, and Http Jetty 3.4.0

+1 (binding) Regards JB On Oct 5, 2016, 13:32, at 13:32, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >I would like to call a vote on the following subproject releases: > >Http Base 3.0.16 (2 issues) >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12338092 > >Http Bridge 3.0.16 (2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Http Base 3.0.16, Http Bridge 3.0.16, and Http Jetty 3.4.0

+1 -- Carsten Ziegeler Adobe Research Switzerland cziege...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Http Base 3.0.16, Http Bridge 3.0.16, and Http Jetty 3.4.0

> On 05 Oct 2016, at 13:25, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) Verified the staged artifacts, did a quick test in a project, all looks peachy: +1.

[VOTE] Release Apache Felix Http Base 3.0.16, Http Bridge 3.0.16, and Http Jetty 3.4.0

I would like to call a vote on the following subproject releases: Http Base 3.0.16 (2 issues) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12338092 Http Bridge 3.0.16 (2 issues) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12338093 Http Jetty 3.4.0 (3 issues)

[jira] [Commented] (FELIX-5247) Reduce number of threads created by Resolver during a startup of OSGi-based applications

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15548317#comment-15548317 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on FELIX-5247: There's no way the resolver can be in used when the

[jira] [Commented] (FELIX-5247) Reduce number of threads created by Resolver during a startup of OSGi-based applications

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15548093#comment-15548093 ] Dmitry Konstantinov commented on FELIX-5247: Guillaume, thanks a lot for the change. Just a

[jira] [Comment Edited] (FELIX-5247) Reduce number of threads created by Resolver during a startup of OSGi-based applications

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15548040#comment-15548040 ] Guillaume Nodet edited comment on FELIX-5247 at 10/5/16 8:20 AM: - By

[jira] [Commented] (FELIX-5247) Reduce number of threads created by Resolver during a startup of OSGi-based applications

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15548040#comment-15548040 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on FELIX-5247: By default, we keep parallelism, but with a single

[jira] [Resolved] (FELIX-5247) Reduce number of threads created by Resolver during a startup of OSGi-based applications

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guillaume Nodet resolved FELIX-5247. Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Guillaume Nodet Fix Version/s: framework-5.8.0

[jira] [Commented] (FELIX-5247) Reduce number of threads created by Resolver during a startup of OSGi-based applications

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15547851#comment-15547851 ] Fabian Lange commented on FELIX-5247: - yes that would be the ideal situation, but I feel not

[jira] [Commented] (FELIX-5247) Reduce number of threads created by Resolver during a startup of OSGi-based applications

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15547843#comment-15547843 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on FELIX-5247: One simple way would be to add a configuration flag to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Http Base 3.0.14, Http Bridge 3.0.14, and Http Jetty 3.3.0

Karl Pauls wrote > Hm, I think we are running into on of the NOTICE in the root of the bundle > svn issues again. > > Both, Bridge and Jetty do not get their NOTICE copied into their binary jar > causing the somewhat awkward situation that the source artifacts have a > NOTICE claiming they

Re: [DISCUSS] Persistent wiring framework

I came up with the following extension: https://github.com/apache/karaf/blob/master/features/extension/src/main/java/org/apache/karaf/features/extension/Activator.java It seems to work correctly so far. I suppose it would be even faster to have it in the framework to avoid going through the

[jira] [Commented] (FELIX-5247) Reduce number of threads created by Resolver during a startup of OSGi-based applications

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15547797#comment-15547797 ] Fabian Lange commented on FELIX-5247: - actually there is another resolver created here: