[jira] [Resolved] (FELIX-5560) Add change count property to runtime service

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Carsten Ziegeler resolved FELIX-5560. - Resolution: Fixed Added a first implementation waiting for 2 seconds before sending out

[jira] [Created] (FELIX-5560) Add change count property to runtime service

Carsten Ziegeler created FELIX-5560: --- Summary: Add change count property to runtime service Key: FELIX-5560 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5560 Project: Felix Issue Type:

[jira] [Created] (FELIX-5559) Add change count property to runtime service

Carsten Ziegeler created FELIX-5559: --- Summary: Add change count property to runtime service Key: FELIX-5559 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5559 Project: Felix Issue Type:

[jira] [Resolved] (FELIX-5457) [R7] Logger Support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Carsten Ziegeler resolved FELIX-5457. - Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Carsten Ziegeler Implemented a first version of this

[jira] [Commented] (FELIX-5457) [R7] Logger Support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15877595#comment-15877595 ] Carsten Ziegeler commented on FELIX-5457: - The reference will be of type LoggerFactory, however

[jira] [Created] (FELIX-5558) Add JavaFX packages

Oliver Lietz created FELIX-5558: --- Summary: Add JavaFX packages Key: FELIX-5558 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5558 Project: Felix Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Closed] (FELIX-5556) JSONParser does not retain object order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefan Seifert closed FELIX-5556. - Resolution: Won't Fix > JSONParser does not retain object order >

[jira] [Assigned] (FELIX-5556) JSONParser does not retain object order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefan Seifert reassigned FELIX-5556: - Assignee: (was: Stefan Seifert) Fix Version/s: (was: utils-1.9.2) >

[jira] [Reopened] (FELIX-5556) JSONParser does not retain object order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefan Seifert reopened FELIX-5556: --- > JSONParser does not retain object order > --- > >

[jira] [Closed] (FELIX-5556) JSONParser does not retain object order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefan Seifert closed FELIX-5556. - Resolution: Won't Fix agreed - setting to won't fix. background was migration of some code that

[jira] [Commented] (FELIX-5556) JSONParser does not retain object order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15875596#comment-15875596 ] David Bosschaert commented on FELIX-5556: - We should not do this. JSON Objects are maps and maps

[jira] [Commented] (FELIX-5556) JSONParser does not retain object order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15875590#comment-15875590 ] Carsten Ziegeler commented on FELIX-5556: - I agree with Felix, we should not provide a false hope.

Re: [utils] support ordering for JSON objects in JSONParser?

Hi, this is another reason to start thinking about using a "real" JSON parser instead of using a simple string parser. As in the other thread about comments, I think if a simple string parser isn't enough, use an existing one, for example Apache Johnzon[1]. In that case you don't have to worry

Re: [utils] support comments in JSONOParser?

+1 I think the objective of the parser in utils is for really simple parsing/simple use cases. We should not add additional features. Carsten Achim Nierbeck wrote > Hi, > > I wouldn't do it, in the end you'll endup re-inventing the wheel a 50th > time. > If you think the minimum parser isn't

Re: [utils] support comments in JSONOParser?

Hi I tend to agree with this … plus: that project even implements the standard javax.json API… Regards Felix > Am 21.02.2017 um 09:06 schrieb Achim Nierbeck : > > Hi, > > I wouldn't do it, in the end you'll endup re-inventing the wheel a 50th > time. > If you think

Re: [utils] support comments in JSONOParser?

Hi, I wouldn't do it, in the end you'll endup re-inventing the wheel a 50th time. If you think the minimum parser isn't sufficient, it's time to think of using another one. As I already pointed out previously we do have an apache project for JSON stuff. At this point if it is really needed and