[jira] [Created] (FELIX-6262) Felix gogo

chris created FELIX-6262: Summary: Felix gogo Key: FELIX-6262 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6262 Project: Felix Issue Type: Bug Reporter: chris I have a security

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix SCR 2.1.20

+1 Pierre On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 7:59 PM Thomas Watson wrote: > +1 > > Tom > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 9:47 AM Carsten Ziegeler > wrote: > > > Hi, > > we solved one regression in this release: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6261 > > > > Staging repositories: > >

[jira] [Commented] (FELIX-6203) Make bundleplugin pom.proterties reproducible

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17086027#comment-17086027 ] Michael Osipov commented on FELIX-6203: --- This is pure waste. Throw this line out, Period. > Make

Re: Atomos - Winegrower

I think that could make a lot of sense. So winegrower could focus on the additional aspects like application assembly and producing docker containers. Christian Am Fr., 17. Apr. 2020 um 16:35 Uhr schrieb Thomas Watson : > Hi JB > > Changing subject to start new thread ... > > I have taken a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix SCR 2.1.20

+1 Tom On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 9:47 AM Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Hi, > we solved one regression in this release: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6261 > > Staging repositories: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1334 > > You can use this UNIX

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix SCR 2.1.20

+1 - Ray On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:21 AM David Bosschaert < david.bosscha...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > David > > On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 at 15:47, Carsten Ziegeler > wrote: > > > Hi, > > we solved one regression in this release: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6261 > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix SCR 2.1.20

+1 David On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 at 15:47, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Hi, > we solved one regression in this release: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6261 > > Staging repositories: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1334 > > You can use this UNIX

Re: Atomos - Winegrower

Right, Atomos is doing the same thing with respect to scanning for JARs on a flat class path, among other things. My concern was that Winegrower is looking for a "lightweight" implementation to provide the OSGi runtime where perhaps it is thought that a full OSGi implementation would be "too

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix SCR 2.1.20

+1 Carsten On 17.04.2020 16:47, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Hi, we solved one regression in this release: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6261 Staging repositories: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1334 You can use this UNIX script to download the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix SCR 2.1.20

+1 regards, Karl On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 4:47 PM Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > Hi, > we solved one regression in this release: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6261 > > Staging repositories: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1334 > > You can use

[VOTE] Release Apache Felix SCR 2.1.20

Hi, we solved one regression in this release: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6261 Staging repositories: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1334 You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the signatures:

Re: Atomos - Winegrower

Hi Tom, Basically, Winegrower idea is to bring the OSGi programming model (activator, service, etc) with a "flat" class loader. So, Winegrower is scanning the provided jar gathering in a single classloader. I’m adding new examples to show use cases. I’m open to any new ideas/features ;)

Atomos - Winegrower

Hi JB Changing subject to start new thread ... I have taken a look at Winegrower, but have not played around with it yet. I am curious if something like Winegrower would be interested in using OSGi Connect to back it with an OSGi R8 framework implementation or perhaps use Atomos for bundle

Re: Proposal for a microservice blueprint

Hi Thomas, Did you take a look on Winegrower ? (Just curious): https://github.com/apache/karaf-winegrower Regards JB > Le 17 avr. 2020 à 15:47, Thomas Watson a écrit : > > I just want to clarify a bit on Atomos and OSGi Connect. While OSGi >

Re: Proposal for a microservice blueprint

I just want to clarify a bit on Atomos and OSGi Connect. While OSGi Connect does allow some more flexibility in the Module Layer of OSGi, it is not entirely getting rid of it. There is still a resolution, there are still bundle wirings and the powerful requirement/capability model, there are

[jira] [Resolved] (FELIX-6261) [Regression] Empty property values are treated as String arrays

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Carsten Ziegeler resolved FELIX-6261. - Resolution: Fixed > [Regression] Empty property values are treated as String arrays >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Converter 1.0.14

+1 Pierre On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 3:17 PM Raymond Auge wrote: > +1 > > - Ray > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020, 08:07 Jean-Baptiste Onofre, wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > > Le 17 avr. 2020 à 10:26, David Bosschaert > > a écrit : > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I would like

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix CM Json 1.0.0

+1 Pierre On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 3:07 PM Raymond Auge wrote: > +1 > > - Ray > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020, 05:00 Karl Pauls, wrote: > > > +1 > > > > regards, > > > > Karl > > > > On Friday, April 17, 2020, Carsten Ziegeler > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Carsten > > > > > > On 17.04.2020

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Converter 1.0.14

+1 - Ray On Fri, Apr 17, 2020, 08:07 Jean-Baptiste Onofre, wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > > Le 17 avr. 2020 à 10:26, David Bosschaert > a écrit : > > > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to release org.apache.felix.converter-1.0.14 > > > > We solved the following issues in this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix CM Json 1.0.0

+1 - Ray On Fri, Apr 17, 2020, 05:00 Karl Pauls, wrote: > +1 > > regards, > > Karl > > On Friday, April 17, 2020, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Carsten > > > > On 17.04.2020 07:50, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> i've extracted the handling of json based

[jira] [Commented] (FELIX-6261) [Regression] Empty property values are treated as String arrays

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17085698#comment-17085698 ] Carsten Ziegeler commented on FELIX-6261: - Fixed this in

[jira] [Updated] (FELIX-6161) SCR: Method of resolving references limits Service ListenerHook implementations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Carsten Ziegeler updated FELIX-6161: Fix Version/s: scr-2.1.22 > SCR: Method of resolving references limits Service

[jira] [Commented] (FELIX-6261) [Regression] Empty property values are treated as String arrays

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17085696#comment-17085696 ] Carsten Ziegeler commented on FELIX-6261: - The regression is introduced by FELIX-6218 (switch of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Converter 1.0.14

+1 (binding) Regards JB > Le 17 avr. 2020 à 10:26, David Bosschaert a > écrit : > > Hi all, > > I would like to release org.apache.felix.converter-1.0.14 > > We solved the following issues in this release: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FELIX/versions/12346490 > > Staging

Re: Proposal for a microservice blueprint

Hi, On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 11:58 AM Christian Schneider wrote: > ...The newest trend goes to building bigger micro services on the level of > domain driven design bounded contexts... FWIW, I've been favoring the term "Federated Services" for quite some time, it's reassuring to see your

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Converter 1.0.14

+1 regards, Karl On Friday, April 17, 2020, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > +1 > > Carsten > > On 17.04.2020 10:26, David Bosschaert wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I would like to release org.apache.felix.converter-1.0.14 >> >> We solved the following issues in this release: >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix CM Json 1.0.0

+1 regards, Karl On Friday, April 17, 2020, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > +1 > > Carsten > > On 17.04.2020 07:50, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> i've extracted the handling of json based configurations from the >> configurator implementation and made a separate api out of it which allows

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix CM Json 1.0.0

+1 Carsten On 17.04.2020 07:50, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Hi, i've extracted the handling of json based configurations from the configurator implementation and made a separate api out of it which allows to read/write configuration (resources). Without this api, tooling needing to deal with

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Converter 1.0.14

+1 Carsten On 17.04.2020 10:26, David Bosschaert wrote: Hi all, I would like to release org.apache.felix.converter-1.0.14 We solved the following issues in this release: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FELIX/versions/12346490 Staging repository:

[VOTE] Release Apache Felix Converter 1.0.14

Hi all, I would like to release org.apache.felix.converter-1.0.14 We solved the following issues in this release: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FELIX/versions/12346490 Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1333 You can use this UNIX

[jira] [Comment Edited] (FELIX-6234) Update Snakeyaml

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17085528#comment-17085528 ] A. J. David Bosschaert edited comment on FELIX-6234 at 4/17/20, 8:10 AM:

[jira] [Commented] (FELIX-6234) Update Snakeyaml

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17085528#comment-17085528 ] A. J. David Bosschaert commented on FELIX-6234: --- Removed the fix release version as the

[jira] [Updated] (FELIX-6234) Update Snakeyaml

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] A. J. David Bosschaert updated FELIX-6234: -- Fix Version/s: (was: converter-1.0.14) > Update Snakeyaml >

[jira] [Resolved] (FELIX-6242) Conversion of boolean to Long results in Integer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] A. J. David Bosschaert resolved FELIX-6242. --- Resolution: Fixed > Conversion of boolean to Long results in Integer >

[jira] [Resolved] (FELIX-6239) Converter should be able to invoke default methods in Interfaces

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] A. J. David Bosschaert resolved FELIX-6239. --- Resolution: Fixed > Converter should be able to invoke default methods in

[GitHub] [felix-dev] bosschaert merged pull request #18: FELIX-6242 Conversion of boolean to Long results in Integer

bosschaert merged pull request #18: FELIX-6242 Conversion of boolean to Long results in Integer URL: https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/pull/18 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

[jira] [Work logged] (FELIX-6242) Conversion of boolean to Long results in Integer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6242?focusedWorklogId=423982=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-423982 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on FELIX-6242: - Author: ASF GitHub Bot

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix CM Json 1.0.0

+1 David On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 at 06:55, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > +1 (binding) > > It’s great because I need this release for Karaf ;) > > Thanks Carsten ! > > Regards > JB > > > Le 17 avr. 2020 à 07:50, Carsten Ziegeler a > écrit : > > > > Hi, > > > > i've extracted the handling of json

Re: Proposal for a microservice blueprint

Seems there is not much interest and some push back so I cancel the proposal. Christian Am So., 12. Apr. 2020 um 11:58 Uhr schrieb Christian Schneider < ch...@die-schneider.net>: > In recent years we saw a big trend towards micro services and cloud. > Lately people discovered though that such

[jira] [Updated] (FELIX-6261) [Regression] Empty property values are treated as String arrays

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Carsten Ziegeler updated FELIX-6261: Summary: [Regression] Empty property values are treated as String arrays (was:

[jira] [Assigned] (FELIX-6261) [Regression] Activation of components fails

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Carsten Ziegeler reassigned FELIX-6261: --- Assignee: Carsten Ziegeler > [Regression] Activation of components fails >

[jira] [Created] (FELIX-6261) [Regression] Activation of components fails

Carsten Ziegeler created FELIX-6261: --- Summary: [Regression] Activation of components fails Key: FELIX-6261 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6261 Project: Felix Issue Type: