Re: Compatibility claims (Was: Re: http.jetty based on Jetty 6)

2008-02-08 Thread Jeff McAffer
to keep the usecase in mind when putting together the other infrastructure. Like I said, random thoughts in random order... Jeff Karl Pauls wrote: On Feb 8, 2008 6:20 AM, Jeff McAffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We've been suffering from this "framework tainting" f

Re: Compatibility claims (Was: Re: http.jetty based on Jetty 6)

2008-02-07 Thread Jeff McAffer
We've been suffering from this "framework tainting" for quite sometime now. Equinox ships many bundles/services that work on other frameworks (as well as ones that work without OSGi at all!). The Equinox community (well at least me) would like to participate in figuring out a way to depict or

Re: http.jetty based on Jetty 6

2008-01-12 Thread Jeff McAffer
Just for grins you might also want to look at the Equinox approach here. http://www.eclipse.org/equinox/server/ Jetty 6 support is on the way there too. Let a thousand flowers bloom... Jeff "Richard S. Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01/09/2008 10:07 AM Please respond to dev@felix.apac

Re: Moving bnd to Java 5 ...

2007-10-09 Thread Jeff McAffer
Stefano Lenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/09/2007 03:30:56 PM: > Also I would like to ask to the Eclipse expert how does Eclipse > implements Execution Environment, because in the properties of a Java > Project it's possible to define the Execution Environment both for > execution and compi