Re: Announcing EZDroid.com!

Congrats Marcel and team, great initiative to get out both ACE and EZDroid! /peter GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer Phone +46 704 106975 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer http://www.neo4j.org - New Energy f

Re: The Future

Congrats Richard! Will be interesting to see what this means for Felix, OSGi in general and the different JSRs related to modules in Java! Interesting times ... /peter GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer ICQ 18762544 GTalk neubauer.peter Phone +46704 106975 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.co

[jira] Commented: (FELIX-589) IP Clearance of Pax Logging

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12601534#action_12601534 ] Peter Neubauer commented on FELIX-589: -- http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/f

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pax Logging donation from OPS4J

Hi there, [x] +1, I am in favor. /peter -- GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer ICQ 18762544 GTalk neubauer.peter Phone +46704 106975 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer http://www.neo4j.org - New Energy for Data - the Graph Database. http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS C

Re: Bundle plugin and Eclipse plugin manifest

t; rg.neo4j.neoclipse;singleton:=true > ... > > Alin > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Peter Neubauer > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi there, > > when trying to use the maven-bundle-plugin to generate the valid > > plugin manife

Bundle plugin and Eclipse plugin manifest

Hi there, when trying to use the maven-bundle-plugin to generate the valid plugin manifest for an Eclipse plugin, it seems there needs to be the singleton directive set, something like: Bundle-SymbolicName: org.neo4j.neoclipse;singleton:=true instead of the generated Bundle-SymbolicName: org.ne

Re: Pax in closer collaboration with Apache Felix?

Hi there, On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:18 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "We who are not Eclipse fanatics should work more together and not dilute our > resources." +1, beside that, most people know each other so we are already working alongside each other, regardless of the commu

Re: New committer: Peter Kriens

Cool, great to see you here Peter! /peter On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Everyone, > > I would like to welcome Peter Kriens as a new committer to the Felix project, > after a successful PMC vote (all voters in favour). > > Peter, WELCOME!! The BN

Re: Dependency management choices?

ok, thanks for al the hints, I will take a look at all this. /peter On Jan 11, 2008 3:24 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Freitag, den 11.01.2008, 21:05 +0800 schrieb Stuart McCulloch: > > On 11/01/2008, Peter Neubauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Dependency management choices?

Hi there, starting off with a small OSGi project again after some time, I wonder what the current status on IoC solutions for OSGi is? I used to use Felix DependencyManager, are there any ohter/ better solutions around that you use? Cheers /peter -- GTalk:neubauer.peter Skypepet

Re: New PMC Member

Cool, congrats and great to have you there, Stuart! /peter

Re: SSL and XML doubts

Hector, Felix is a OSGi implementation. That means, it is using plain Java to broker services and acts with a Single-VM focus. >From your problem description, it seems you are researching some kind of SOA/SCA/other distributed services solution and you should probably take a look at Mule or Newton

Re: Home for fileinstall

Hi there, great to get this into the wild :) On Nov 23, 2007 7:50 AM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > agree - it would be great to have this in Felix (otherwise we'd be happy to > host it over at OPS4J ;) +1, it might be that common OSGi stuff is less politically tainted when it is no

Re: New job for me

Congrats Richard! /peter On 8/15/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/15/07, Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just wanted to let everyone know that I have accepted a visiting > > assistant professor position at Tufts University in Boston for the > > coming school y

Re: Apache Felix website design

Very good work Marcel and others! Looks great and the content is good, too. What will be the distinction between the static pages and confluence, or is everything going to be based on confluence? /petre On 7/14/07, Marcel Offermans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Since we're close to our first relea

[jira] Commented: (FELIX-310) provide a maven 'felix:run' goal for running a maven created bundle inside an embedded Felix server

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12506631 ] Peter Neubauer commented on FELIX-310: -- There is some related work going on but being focused on portability

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (FELIX-50) Some contribution to the Dependency manager

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-50?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12503306 ] Peter Neubauer edited comment on FELIX-50 at 6/11/07 12:23 AM: --- Marcel, the new

[jira] Commented: (FELIX-50) Some contribution to the Dependency manager

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-50?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12503306 ] Peter Neubauer commented on FELIX-50: - Marcel, the new refactored version seems to work fine, just make the

[jira] Commented: (FELIX-50) Some contribution to the Dependency manager

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-50?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12503036 ] Peter Neubauer commented on FELIX-50: - Cool, will llok at it ASAP. Is this going towards monitoring capabilities

Re: Niclas Hedhman joins the Felix PMC

Congrats Niclas and the Felix team! /peter On 6/7/07, Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello everyone, The Felix PMC members offered Niclas Hedhman a spot on the Felix PMC and he has accepted. We all appreciate Niclas' active involvement in both OSGi- and Apache-related issues and l

Re: Re[2]: [Bnd] including root level resources on the bundle classpath?

our file in the root of the jar. AD> Alin AD> On 6/5/07, Peter Neubauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi there, >> I would like to include resources at root level (without a package >> name) so they get into the bundles classpath, e.g. log4j.propertie

[Bnd] including root level resources on the bundle classpath?

Hi there, I would like to include resources at root level (without a package name) so they get into the bundles classpath, e.g. log4j.properties. What do I use to get the included? I tried something like Private-Package: lib, log4j.properties in my details.bnd (using PaxConstruct structure) but

Re: Spring included in OSGi R5?

Well, I am not involved in the spec but I would guess that at the most Spring would become an optional part of the spec since one of the main goals of OSGi is to be lean and slim. At the least I guess that the Declarative Services spec will be changed to make the declaration part Spring context-xm