[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148236#comment-13148236
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3202:
Keep in mind that the indexed case
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148237#comment-13148237
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3178:
Great. We'll start a 4.0.2 release pretty
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148334#comment-13148334
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3160:
Rob, I'm still waiting on you to help me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall updated FELIX-3211:
---
Fix Version/s: framework-4.2.0
Assignee: Richard S. Hall
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall resolved FELIX-3211.
Resolution: Fixed
I committed a patch, please close this issue if you are satisfied
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall updated FELIX-3205:
---
Component/s: Specification compliance
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
Error
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall resolved FELIX-3205.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Richard S. Hall
Those values were not properly being
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall resolved FELIX-3207.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: framework-4.2.0
Assignee: Richard S. Hall
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13146033#comment-13146033
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3202:
(1) The spec won't change to eliminate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall updated FELIX-3205:
---
Fix Version/s: framework-4.2.0
Error resolving system.bundle dependencies
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13146070#comment-13146070
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3202:
(3) Java basically encourages people
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13146070#comment-13146070
]
Richard S. Hall edited comment on FELIX-3202 at 11/8/11 4:14 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13146113#comment-13146113
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3178:
I've committed a patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13145248#comment-13145248
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3202:
This replaces one class with 13 to add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13144872#comment-13144872
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3179:
Smaller patches are generally better, so
Components: Framework, Specification compliance
Affects Versions: framework-4.0.1
Reporter: Richard S. Hall
Assignee: Richard S. Hall
Priority: Minor
Fix For: framework-4.2.0
The framework's OSGi header parser is basically flag escape characters
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall closed FELIX-3194.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed a patch to fix this.
[Framework] Manifest parser
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13140336#comment-13140336
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3178:
Just a status update, I've create a test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13140336#comment-13140336
]
Richard S. Hall edited comment on FELIX-3178 at 10/31/11 5:34 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13139521#comment-13139521
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3179:
It will likely take me a little while
On 10/27/11 02:48 , Sahoo wrote:
On Thursday 27 October 2011 12:06 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi,
Am 27.10.2011 um 07:48 schrieb Sahoo:
On Wednesday 26 October 2011 09:56 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
Just wondering, can't this just be calculated after calling resolve()?
It is possible
On 10/26/11 05:02 , Guillaume Sauthier (OW2) wrote:
Hi all
In one of our project we spotted an intensive usage of ZipFile.getEntry()
due to Felix trying to access the resource associated with a class when the
class is not defined yet. As the requested resource is not boot delegated,
nor
On 10/26/11 05:52 , Sahoo wrote:
Can we modify org.apache.felix.bundlerepository.Resolver.deploy() to
return Bundle[] instead of void? This will make it incompatible. If
that's an issue, can we add a new deploy method? I don't like to add a
bundle listener just to identify the bundles that
Yeah, I wouldn't worry too much about it...the root build is always
flaky. I don't think most people build from the root. We should either
clean it up or get rid of it.
- richard
On 10/25/11 02:32 , Ken Gilmer wrote:
Hi,
In order to get the httplite bundle to build along with the rest I
On 10/25/11 09:24 , Ken Gilmer wrote:
Hi Richard,
Ok good to know. So what steps do I take so that httplite is consumable
and documented on the Felix website? I mean listed on the build page (
http://felix.apache.org/site/downloads.cgi) and a doc page (
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13134131#comment-13134131
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3178:
Do I just 'cat' these three files
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13134235#comment-13134235
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3178:
Ok, I see what is going on. Previously
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall updated FELIX-3178:
---
Fix Version/s: framework-4.2.0
NPE in ResolverImpl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13132690#comment-13132690
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3179:
Thanks for the patch. It might take me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13133058#comment-13133058
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3178:
Having the manifest alone isn't
Perhaps you could set felix.log.level to 4 in conf/config.properties to
see if you get any additional information. If not, perhaps you could zip
something up and send it to me privately to see if I could recreate it?
- richard
On 10/19/11 12:26 , Andreas Egloff wrote:
We have one bundle
schrieb Richard S. Hall:
In our default OBR repo, I see this:
Apache Felix Web Management Console (3.1.2, ...)
Apache Felix Web Management Console (3.1.2, ...)
Upon further investigation is appears they are different, since they
have different symbolic names. If this is intentional
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall resolved FELIX-3166.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: framework-4.2.0
Assignee: Richard S. Hall
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13128896#comment-13128896
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3160:
Yeah, I think Karl is correct. I'll look
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13128917#comment-13128917
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3160:
I'm still not able to recreate, so I
On 10/17/11 11:20 , Lucas Galfaso wrote:
Hi all,
I've been looking into the framework code and there are large parts
of it that do not use Java 5 generics.
Is there some interest in changing the code so the type erasure
versions are not used? This is a task that I would be willing to take.
In our default OBR repo, I see this:
Apache Felix Web Management Console (3.1.2, ...)
Apache Felix Web Management Console (3.1.2, ...)
Upon further investigation is appears they are different, since they
have different symbolic names. If this is intentional, wouldn't it be
better to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13128277#comment-13128277
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3160:
I created a bundle like this:
public
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall resolved FELIX-3156.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Richard S. Hall
I applied your patch, please close
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall closed FELIX-538.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Ken Gilmer
Ken Gilmer's contributed implementation has been
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13126664#comment-13126664
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-2340:
I am thinking of having one single
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall updated FELIX-3160:
---
Affects Version/s: framework-4.0.0
Fix Version/s: framework-4.2.0
NPE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13125887#comment-13125887
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3160:
This doesn't sound right. Do you have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13125083#comment-13125083
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3154:
Still, once you detect it, you can
+1
- richard
On 10/10/11 4:33 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
I would like to call a vote on the following subproject releases:
framework 4.0.1
main 4.0.1
main.distribution 4.0.1
Staging repositories:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-052/
You can use this UNIX
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13125178#comment-13125178
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3156:
Yeah, those appear to be some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall updated FELIX-3156:
---
Fix Version/s: framework-4.2.0
Implement Bundle::getDataFile and Bundle::compareTo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall updated FELIX-3150:
---
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
Fix Version/s: framework-4.0.1
Filter parameter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13124175#comment-13124175
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3151:
There is no particular reason. It could
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall resolved FELIX-3150.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Richard S. Hall
I committed a patch to pass the filter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13124241#comment-13124241
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3153:
Try to recreate on the current framework
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13124243#comment-13124243
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3004:
It would look like it, since 2.0.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13124320#comment-13124320
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3154:
Use the Felix framework constructor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13124324#comment-13124324
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3153:
Yes, the current release is 4.0.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall updated FELIX-3153:
---
Fix Version/s: framework-4.0.1
Assignee: Richard S. Hall
refreshPackages
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13124431#comment-13124431
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3153:
Ok, I hacked up ServiceMix to run
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall updated FELIX-3153:
---
Summary: [Framework] refreshPackages() should stop bundles in one pass and
refresh them
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall resolved FELIX-3153.
Resolution: Fixed
I have committed a patch for the issue related to the framework
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13124449#comment-13124449
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3153:
I don't see how the order of refresh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13124449#comment-13124449
]
Richard S. Hall edited comment on FELIX-3153 at 10/10/11 8:13 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13123815#comment-13123815
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3084:
No, nothing to do. It is done and I'll
Yes, that looks like an oversight, did you open an issue for it? We'll do a
4.0.1 release next week hopefully and did this as well as another issue with
singletons.
Until then, just use the non-generic version of the method.
--
Sent from my phone, please excuse my brevity.
Lucas Galfaso
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13120591#comment-13120591
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3147:
Do you have the security provider bundle
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13118190#comment-13118190
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3084:
The IP clearance form is visible now
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Framework
Affects Versions: framework-4.0.0
Reporter: Richard S. Hall
Assignee: Richard S. Hall
Priority: Minor
Fix For: framework-4.0.1
Currently, the resolver implementation filters out fragment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall closed FELIX-3141.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed a patch.
[Framework] Framework should filter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13117626#comment-13117626
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3084:
I think we are ready now. I've created
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13116576#comment-13116576
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3084:
As stated in
http://incubator.apache.org
: Felix
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Framework, Specification compliance
Affects Versions: framework-4.0.0
Reporter: Richard S. Hall
Assignee: Richard S. Hall
Fix For: framework-4.2.0
Singleton bundle selection happens at the beginning of each
Just an FYI...
Apparently, they've installed a new version of JIRA. Previously, when
you created a version they provided a drop-down menu where you could
select the order that your created version follows to maintain proper
sort order. (As an aside, people forget to do this, so please
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall closed FELIX-3138.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed patch.
[Framework] Refactor some unnecessary
Components: Framework
Affects Versions: framework-4.0.0
Reporter: Richard S. Hall
Assignee: Richard S. Hall
Priority: Minor
Fix For: framework-4.0.1
After the 4.0.0 release, I noticed some unnecessary code in the resolver, so I
simplified
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall closed FELIX-3137.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed patch.
[Framework] Capabilities from resolved
I think it would be interesting, assuming that there would be ongoing
development of it. Do you plan to continue to work on it to fill the gaps?
- richard
On 9/27/11 11:15 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Is there interest in an implementation of the OSGi Initial Provisioning
1.2 service? AFAICT,
On 27.09.2011 17:20:14 Richard S. Hall wrote:
I think it would be interesting, assuming that there would be ongoing
development of it. Do you plan to continue to work on it to fill the gaps?
- richard
On 9/27/11 11:15 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Is there interest in an implementation of the OSGi Initial
The vote to accept Ken Gilmer's contribution has passed with the
following votes:
* +1 from Karl Pauls, Stuart McCulloch, Marcel Offermans, Carsten
Ziegeler, Clement Escoffier, Julian Sedding, Rob Walker, Felix
Meschberger, Davanum Srinivas, and Richard S. Hall
I'll start to work
Resending with proper subject line...
On 9/27/11 1:21 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
The vote to accept Ken Gilmer's contribution has passed with the
following votes:
* +1 from Karl Pauls, Stuart McCulloch, Marcel Offermans, Carsten
Ziegeler, Clement Escoffier, Julian Sedding, Rob Walker
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13115763#comment-13115763
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3084:
Ken, the vote to accept your contribution
+1
- richard
On 9/26/11 3:04 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Arjun Panday has offered to contribute a Service Diagnostics service
and graphical WebConsole plugin
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3128
This idea has received positive feedback in email discussion, so I'd
like to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall resolved FELIX-2648.
Resolution: Won't Fix
Fix Version/s: (was: framework.security-2.0.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13113442#comment-13113442
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3129:
As OBR moves toward the new RFC 112
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall updated FELIX-3035:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: framework-4.0.0)
framework-4.2.0
Make Felix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall closed FELIX-3051.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Richard S. Hall
[Main] Integrate latest Gogo Command bundle
+1
Still no DEPS file in Gogo Command sources, perhaps because it wasn't
updated to use the new parent pom.
- richard
On 9/22/11 11:47 AM, Karl Pauls wrote:
I would like to call a vote on the following subproject releases:
framework 4.0.0
framework.security 2.0.0
main 4.0.0
Ken Gilmer has offered to contribute a lightweight HTTP Service
implementation to Felix:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3084
This idea has received positive feedback in email discussion, so I'd
like to call a vote on it.
[ ] +1 Accept the contribution
[ ] 0 No opinion
[
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13112901#comment-13112901
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3084:
I just called a vote. Sorry for the delay
+1
- richard
On 9/22/11 4:55 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
Ken Gilmer has offered to contribute a lightweight HTTP Service
implementation to Felix:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3084
This idea has received positive feedback in email discussion, so I'd
like to call a vote
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13113038#comment-13113038
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-2775:
Framework 4.0 along with security
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall reopened FELIX-3115:
Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment matching fails when multiple environment
is specified
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall closed FELIX-3115.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
This was fixed in 1.6.4 and is a duplicate of FELIX-2385.
Bundle
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall resolved FELIX-3119.
Resolution: Fixed
Done. Please close if satisfied. Thanks.
Parser check for empty
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13109820#comment-13109820
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3035:
Even then this would create a situation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall resolved FELIX-3035.
Resolution: Fixed
Karl devised a way to do what I proposed with some pom magic, so I am
On 9/20/11 9:47 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
The osgi core spec specifies how the osgi framework behaves. This header
is not used anymore by the osgi framework, and only mentioned as being for
informational purposes, which is how we use it here (from the osgi core
point of view).
That said,
On 9/20/11 11:10 AM, gno...@apache.org wrote:
Author: gnodet
Date: Tue Sep 20 15:10:23 2011
New Revision: 1173181
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1173181view=rev
Log:
FELIX-3121: add back service manifest headers
Modified:
felix/trunk/eventadmin/impl/pom.xml
Modified:
On 9/20/11 10:08 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Yeah, but the implementation do not yet leverage those headers, but I agree
we can start the discussion about defining some namespaces we want to use
for certain applications like services and extenders.
One thing to point out, how we've been
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall updated FELIX-2340:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: gogo.command-0.12.0)
gogo.command-0.14.0
, Specification compliance
Affects Versions: framework-3.2.2
Reporter: Richard S. Hall
Assignee: Richard S. Hall
Priority: Minor
Fix For: framework-4.0.0
The OSGi R4.3 spec requires that a framework generates a UUID each time it is
init'ed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13108896#comment-13108896
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3115:
This appears to be working in OBR 1.6.6
-3.2.2
Reporter: Richard S. Hall
Assignee: Richard S. Hall
Priority: Minor
Fix For: framework-4.0.0
The framework distribution currently uses OBR 1.6.2, we should probably upgrade
this to 1.6.6.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA
701 - 800 of 3817 matches
Mail list logo
