On 10/4/16 04:13 , Guillaume Nodet wrote:
2016-10-04 9:16 GMT+02:00 David Bosschaert :
Hi Guillaume,
Does gogo-runtime have a dependency on gogo-jline or will it work without?
Just trying to understand what Java 7 users will be able to do/are missing
without gogo-jline...
No, the dependenc
2016-10-04 9:16 GMT+02:00 David Bosschaert :
> Hi Guillaume,
>
> Does gogo-runtime have a dependency on gogo-jline or will it work without?
> Just trying to understand what Java 7 users will be able to do/are missing
> without gogo-jline...
>
No, the dependency is from gogo-jline to gogo-runtime.
Hi Guillaume,
Does gogo-runtime have a dependency on gogo-jline or will it work without?
Just trying to understand what Java 7 users will be able to do/are missing
without gogo-jline...
On the version number, if the refactoring was just a change of internal
implementation details without any API
I've downgraded the requirement or the gogo-runtime to java 7.
That's not really possible for the gogo-jline bundle which has a dependency
on jline requiring java 8 atm.
Given the amount of change, I think it would be better to bump the
gogo-runtime bundle version. Given it's currently at 0.17, w
I already tested the new gogo shell and apart from some minor issues
that I found and reported it worked really well.
So I would be happy to see a release soon.
Christian
On 28.09.2016 00:02, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I'd like to release the big changes pending in gogo runtime and gogo jline
bund
I think it would be great to finally get the improved gogo shell released
in Felix. Personally I don't really need Java 7 support, but it might be
good to allow this to enable wider adoption. If we support Java 7 we might
be able to replace the default shell in the Felix Framework download with
thi
I think it's worth to stay with Java8.
Regards
JB
On 09/28/2016 10:00 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
So the gogo-jline depends on jline3, which has a requirement on java 8.
The gogo-runtime currently needs java 8, but mostly for syntactic sugar
(lambda + streams) and it can be downgraded to a java
Hi,
TBH, Java 7 is EOL since about a year. Is it really necessary to block
improvements on the gogo shell because of old Java versions for ever?
just my 2 cents.
regards, Achim
2016-09-28 10:00 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Nodet :
> So the gogo-jline depends on jline3, which has a requirement on java 8
So the gogo-jline depends on jline3, which has a requirement on java 8.
The gogo-runtime currently needs java 8, but mostly for syntactic sugar
(lambda + streams) and it can be downgraded to a java 7 requirement (it
can't go down to java 6 due to the use of the NIO api with Paths and
Channels).
I c
I don’t recall too well…. IIRC line requires java 8. Does the rest of gogo now
also require java 8?
thanks
david jencks
> On Sep 27, 2016, at 3:02 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
> I'd like to release the big changes pending in gogo runtime and gogo jline
> bundles.
> Given there are some big c
I'd like to release the big changes pending in gogo runtime and gogo jline
bundles.
Given there are some big changes in the runtime (the jline one is a new
bundle, so it does not matter so much), I'd like to give people some time
to review the changes.
I'd like to do the release next week if there
11 matches
Mail list logo
