Hi,
Yes. Makes sense. Thanks for fixing.
Regards
Felix
Am 05.06.2012 um 03:36 schrieb David Jencks:
>
> On Jun 4, 2012, at 11:13 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 04.06.2012 um 19:16 schrieb David Jencks:
>>
>>> cf FELIX-3506, 3377.
>>>
>>> Right now we have it set up so that
On Jun 4, 2012, at 11:13 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 04.06.2012 um 19:16 schrieb David Jencks:
>
>> cf FELIX-3506, 3377.
>>
>> Right now we have it set up so that a lifecycle method can return the exact
>> set of service properties it wants the service registration to have. I'm
Hi,
Am 04.06.2012 um 19:16 schrieb David Jencks:
> cf FELIX-3506, 3377.
>
> Right now we have it set up so that a lifecycle method can return the exact
> set of service properties it wants the service registration to have. I'm not
> at all sure this is a plausible way to operate since usually
cf FELIX-3506, 3377.
Right now we have it set up so that a lifecycle method can return the exact set
of service properties it wants the service registration to have. I'm not at
all sure this is a plausible way to operate since usually you'd use this
feature to set or unset a flag in the servic
