On Dec 16, 2012, at 6:03 , David Jencks wrote:
> 1. use a copy of ServiceTracker modified for the requirements of DS.
> Service tracker actually tracks services properly and doesn't emit duplicate
> events, miss events, etc etc. I don't think its possible to track services
> properly in any
Hi David,
Just to let you know I did some quick testing and I did not find any
regressions.
I think you can commit if you think you are ready.
regards;
/pierre
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:03 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> I've been working on fixing the numerous timing holes in ds dependency
> tracki
Hi David,
great ! I'll try to do some tests this week.
regards
/Pierre
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:03 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> I've been working on fixing the numerous timing holes in ds dependency
> tracking and I think I'm getting close to being willing to commit the
> results.
>
> I've put wh
I've been working on fixing the numerous timing holes in ds dependency tracking
and I think I'm getting close to being willing to commit the results.
I've put what I have now up at github at https://github.com/djencks/felix.git
in the service-tracker-3 branch. If anyone is interested in taking
