+1
Regards
Felix
Am Freitag, den 11.01.2008, 16:37 +0100 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler:
> Hi,
>
> I've compiled the release candidate for our first official
> org.osgi.foundation release (1.0.0) and put it up here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/releases/felix/org.osgi.foundation/
>
> The
+1
Cheer
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
+1
best regards,
Didier
On Jan 12, 2008 6:14 AM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 11/01/2008, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've compiled the release candidate for our first official
> org.osgi.foundation release (1.0.0) and put it up here:
>
> http://p
+1
regards,
Karl
On Jan 12, 2008 6:14 AM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/01/2008, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've compiled the release candidate for our first official
> > org.osgi.foundation release (1.0.0) and put it up here:
> >
> > ht
On 11/01/2008, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've compiled the release candidate for our first official
> org.osgi.foundation release (1.0.0) and put it up here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/releases/felix/org.osgi.foundation/
>
> The KEYS file for verifying the
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Richard S. Hall wrote:
+1
Apparently this maven release process makes it really difficult to
generate *.md5 and *.sha1 files consistently, because not only are
these files not properly formatted for md5sum/sha1sum, but they don't
even contain a line feed like previous
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
That's really annoying; I'm wondering why the chose this format?
I'll have a look if we can do something about it for the upcoming
releases.
Yeah, I don't know. It is odd. It's a new experience for me every time. :-)
-> richard
+1
Carsten
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hi,
I've compiled the release candidate for our first official
org.osgi.foundation release (1.0.0) and put it up here:
http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/releases/felix/org.osgi.foundation/
The KEYS file for verifying the signature is also in this direct
Richard S. Hall wrote:
+1
Apparently this maven release process makes it really difficult to
generate *.md5 and *.sha1 files consistently, because not only are these
files not properly formatted for md5sum/sha1sum, but they don't even
contain a line feed like previous release, so "cat *.md5"
+1
Apparently this maven release process makes it really difficult to
generate *.md5 and *.sha1 files consistently, because not only are these
files not properly formatted for md5sum/sha1sum, but they don't even
contain a line feed like previous release, so "cat *.md5" gives a single
line res
Hi,
I've compiled the release candidate for our first official
org.osgi.foundation release (1.0.0) and put it up here:
http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/releases/felix/org.osgi.foundation/
The KEYS file for verifying the signature is also in this directory.
So, please check the release and
Hi,
I've compiled the release candidate for our first official
org.osgi.foundation release (1.0.0) and put it up here:
http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/releases/felix/org.osgi.foundation/
The KEYS file for verifying the signature is also in this directory.
So, please check the release and
12 matches
Mail list logo
