[RESULT][VOTE] Release iPOJO 1.2.0 - Step 2

2009-02-08 Thread Clement Escoffier
It’s time to finally close the vote on the iPOJO 1.2.0 release (second step). * +1 votes from Karl Pauls, Stuart McCulloch, Richard S. Hall, and Felix Meschberger. * No other votes The vote is successful. I will make the release artifacts available as soon as possible. Thanks,

Re: [Vote] Release iPOJO 1.2.0 - Step 2

2009-02-05 Thread Richard S. Hall
+1 Sorry it took me so long. - richard Clement Escoffier wrote: Hi all, As we're in the release/voting season, I cut the second step of the iPOJO framework release (composite + external handlers). Six artifacts compose this second step. The RCs are available here:

[Vote] Release iPOJO 1.2.0 - Step 2

2009-01-30 Thread Clement Escoffier
Hi all, As we're in the release/voting season, I cut the second step of the iPOJO framework release (composite + external handlers). Six artifacts compose this second step. The RCs are available here:

Re: [Vote] Release iPOJO 1.2.0 - Step 2

2009-01-30 Thread Stuart McCulloch
2009/1/30 Clement Escoffier clement.escoff...@gmail.com Hi all, As we're in the release/voting season, I cut the second step of the iPOJO framework release (composite + external handlers). Six artifacts compose this second step. The RCs are available here:

Re: [Vote] Release iPOJO 1.2.0 - Step 2

2009-01-30 Thread Felix Meschberger
+1 Just a question: Is there a license attributed with the ga.js files ? if so, we should make sure, that it is properly listed in the NOTICE file. Regards Felix Clement Escoffier schrieb: Hi all, As we're in the release/voting season, I cut the second step of the iPOJO framework release

Re: [Vote] Release iPOJO 1.2.0 - Step 2

2009-01-30 Thread Stuart McCulloch
2009/1/31 Felix Meschberger fmesc...@gmail.com +1 Just a question: Is there a license attributed with the ga.js files ? if so, we should make sure, that it is properly listed in the NOTICE file. afaik those are from the online docs on the website - if you do a save page as... complete from

Re: [Vote] Release iPOJO 1.2.0 - Step 2

2009-01-30 Thread Clement Escoffier
Hi Sent from my iPhone On 30.01.2009, at 17:13, Stuart McCulloch mccu...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/1/31 Felix Meschberger fmesc...@gmail.com +1 Just a question: Is there a license attributed with the ga.js files ? if so, we should make sure, that it is properly listed in the NOTICE file.

Re: [Vote] Release iPOJO 1.2.0 - Step 2

2009-01-30 Thread Karl Pauls
+1 Regarding the ga.js I'd say its generated and wouldn't add it to the notice. regards, Karl On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Clement Escoffier clement.escoff...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Sent from my iPhone On 30.01.2009, at 17:13, Stuart McCulloch mccu...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/1/31 Felix

Re: [Vote] Release iPOJO 1.2.0

2009-01-27 Thread Clement Escoffier
Oups, I forget mine, +1, Clement On 25.01.2009, at 17:59, Karl Pauls wrote: +1 regards, Karl On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Clement Escoffier clement.escoff...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I finally cut the third release of the iPOJO framework. It's a two-step release. To avoid

Re: [Vote] Release iPOJO 1.2.0

2009-01-23 Thread Richard S. Hall
+1 Whew! One down clement, two more to go... I think we need to investigate if there is a simpler way to release iPOJO in the future. It is a lot of work for both Clement to create the release and for us to verify it. Clearly, the current process is not geared toward highly modular systems

Re: [Vote] Release iPOJO 1.2.0

2009-01-23 Thread Clement Escoffier
Hi, I just added my key at the root of the repository. Moreover, I fix some issue in signature file. The signatures were correct, but the beautification mess up some files (repeat the name several times). I had an issue in my beautification script. Clement On 21.01.2009, at 10:50,

Re: [Vote] Release iPOJO 1.2.0

2009-01-23 Thread Stuart McCulloch
2009/1/24 Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org +1 Whew! One down clement, two more to go... I'll try to finish checking it this weekend, haven't had time to go through it all I think we need to investigate if there is a simpler way to release iPOJO in the future. It is a lot of work for

Re: [Vote] Release iPOJO 1.2.0

2009-01-21 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Clement Escoffier clement.escoff...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The KEYS file is here : http://www.apache.org/dist/felix/KEYS Do we need to add it at the root of the repository? The release management guide just say to append it to

Re: [Vote] Release iPOJO 1.2.0

2009-01-21 Thread Richard S. Hall
That explains it. I thought you had added your keys somewhere, but I couldn't find them. Probably makes sense to put them in both places...and to modify future vote messages to correctly indicate where they are. :-) Thanks. - richard Clement Escoffier wrote: Hi, The KEYS file is here :

Re: [Vote] Release iPOJO 1.2.0

2009-01-20 Thread Richard S. Hall
Clement, Where are your KEYS? I didn't see them. Shouldn't they just be in the KEYS file in the root of our SVN repo? - richard Clement Escoffier wrote: Hi all, I finally cut the third release of the iPOJO framework. It's a two-step release. To avoid releasing too much artifacts at the

Re: [Vote] Release iPOJO 1.2.0

2009-01-20 Thread Clement Escoffier
Hi, The KEYS file is here : http://www.apache.org/dist/felix/KEYS Do we need to add it at the root of the repository? The release management guide just say to append it to /x1/www/www.apache.org/dist/felix/KEYS . Clement On 20.01.2009, at 21:01, Richard S. Hall wrote: Clement, Where

[Vote] Release iPOJO 1.2.0

2009-01-19 Thread Clement Escoffier
Hi all, I finally cut the third release of the iPOJO framework. It's a two-step release. To avoid releasing too much artifacts at the same time, I call a vote only for the core of the iPOJO framework (so 7 artifacts). (external handlers and composite) will be release after those ones). The