Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0

2008-01-07 Thread Karl Pauls
+1 regards, Karl On Jan 3, 2008 4:14 PM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'd like to start a vote for the release of the > org.osgi.service.obrsub-project. > > This sub-project contains OBR classes provided by the OSGi Alliance and was > originally part of the bundle

Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0

2008-01-07 Thread Richard S. Hall
+1 Stuart, the MD5 and SHA1 files for the JAR and the POM where generated differently than the ones for the src tar.gz/zip files...the latter ones work better for me, since md5sum and sha1sum can then verify the files directly. I think we should be able to close this vote shortly, which will

Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0

2008-01-07 Thread Felix Meschberger
Here is my +1. Thanks for adding the sources. Regards Felix Am Donnerstag, den 03.01.2008, 23:14 +0800 schrieb Stuart McCulloch: > Hi folks, > > I'd like to start a vote for the release of the > org.osgi.service.obrsub-project. > > This sub-project contains OBR classes provided by the OSGi Al

Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0

2008-01-07 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
+1 Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0

2008-01-06 Thread Didier Donsez
+1 Didier

Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0

2008-01-05 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Saturday 05 January 2008 19:15, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > +1 +1 Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug

Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0

2008-01-05 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 03/01/2008, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I'd like to start a vote for the release of the > org.osgi.service.obrsub-project. > > This sub-project contains OBR classes provided by the OSGi Alliance and > was > originally part of the bundlerepository, but it has be

Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0

2008-01-04 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Friday 04 January 2008 20:55, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > though it would be nice to have source & javadoc on the Maven repo too Yes, as a user, I like that too. My fav; mvn dependency:sources Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; h

Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0

2008-01-04 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Jan 4, 2008 4:01 AM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 04/01/2008, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Thursday 03 January 2008 23:14, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > > > I've compiled the 1.0.0 release candidate and put it up here: > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/

Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0

2008-01-04 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 04/01/2008, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Friday 04 January 2008 12:01, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > > Felix releases to date on http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/felix > > _none_ of them have either source or javadoc artifacts. > > This is not the release location. It is

Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0

2008-01-04 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Friday 04 January 2008 12:01, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > Felix releases to date on http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/felix > _none_ of them have either source or javadoc artifacts. This is not the release location. It is an external service provided by "someone else", not important to th

Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0

2008-01-04 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Stuart McCulloch wrote: > > BTW, shouldn't http://felix.apache.org/site/downloads.cgi show the source > downloads? > When I view it with firefox I don't see any download links - but I > eventually found them > over at http://apache.leakage.org/felix > > (this is what originally confused me about

Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0

2008-01-03 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 04/01/2008, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 04/01/2008, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Thursday 03 January 2008 23:14, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > > > I've compiled the 1.0.0 release candidate and put it up here: > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mccull

Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0

2008-01-03 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 04/01/2008, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 03 January 2008 23:14, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > > I've compiled the 1.0.0 release candidate and put it up here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mcculls/releases/felix/org.osgi.service.obr/ > > ASF is all about Open *Source*

Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0

2008-01-03 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 04/01/2008, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 04/01/2008, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Thursday 03 January 2008 23:14, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > > > I've compiled the 1.0.0 release candidate and put it up here: > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mccull

Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0

2008-01-03 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 04/01/2008, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 03 January 2008 23:14, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > > I've compiled the 1.0.0 release candidate and put it up here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mcculls/releases/felix/org.osgi.service.obr/ > > ASF is all about Open *Source*

Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0

2008-01-03 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Thursday 03 January 2008 23:14, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > I've compiled the 1.0.0 release candidate and put it up here: > > http://people.apache.org/~mcculls/releases/felix/org.osgi.service.obr/ ASF is all about Open *Source*. Releases are source releases and binary releases are just convenien

[Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0

2008-01-03 Thread Stuart McCulloch
Hi folks, I'd like to start a vote for the release of the org.osgi.service.obrsub-project. This sub-project contains OBR classes provided by the OSGi Alliance and was originally part of the bundlerepository, but it has been separated out so that the maven-obr-plugin can also use the classes witho