Re: Configuration Admin Extension

2007-07-14 Thread Steven E. Harris
Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Configuration is only added. I wrote a similar system inspired by the PropertyFileConfigurationInitializer described here: https://scm.ops4j.org/repos/ops4j/laboratory/users/bschmaus/net.tucana.osgi.impl.config/README In my version, the applicat

Re: Configuration Admin Extension

2007-07-13 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
BJ Hargrave wrote: > Have you looked at section 115 Auto Configuration in the OSGi R4 Mobile > spec? I think it does what you want. Hmm, yes I think this is nearly what we are looking for with the exception that we would like to configure "foreign bundles" as well. (And the syntax for the config

Re: Configuration Admin Extension

2007-07-12 Thread Felix Meschberger
Wow ! I have to admit that I did not have a look at the 4.1 spec yet, so I did not realize there was a whole bunch of new service specs. I will of course now go back and start reading. Thanks for the hint. Until then I think, this idea is just to be dropped :-) Regards Felix Am Donnerstag, d

Re: Configuration Admin Extension

2007-07-12 Thread BJ Hargrave
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-07-12 03:36 Please respond to dev@felix.apache.org To Felix Dev cc Subject Configuration Admin Extension Hi all, Currently the Felix Config Admin implements the spec and as such provides the configuratio

Configuration Admin Extension

2007-07-12 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi all, Currently the Felix Config Admin implements the spec and as such provides the configuration objects as required. What we are missing here in one our projects is some kind of default configuration. As far as I understand the specs, the Configuration Admin provides configuration to ManagedS