Re: Felix 4.2.0 and R5 core spec

2013-02-11 Thread Richard S. Hall
On 2/11/13 09:14 , Sahoo wrote: How does one know which are partially implemented vs. fully implemented? Is it documented anywhere? There was no attempt to implement any of the R5 API because I didn't personally have the time to do it. This was just an attempt to move to the R5 API to make it

Re: Felix 4.2.0 and R5 core spec

2013-02-11 Thread Sahoo
How does one know which are partially implemented vs. fully implemented? Is it documented anywhere? Thanks, Sahoo On Monday 11 February 2013 04:44 PM, Karl Pauls wrote: We do use the R5 api and implement parts of it but I don't think we are implementing all of it yet... regards, Karl On M

Re: Felix 4.2.0 and R5 core spec

2013-02-11 Thread Karl Pauls
We do use the R5 api and implement parts of it but I don't think we are implementing all of it yet... regards, Karl On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Sahoo wrote: > Does Felix 4.2.0 not include all of R5 core APIs? I am assuming it also > implements them. If so, why should it not be called an

Felix 4.2.0 and R5 core spec

2013-02-10 Thread Sahoo
Does Felix 4.2.0 not include all of R5 core APIs? I am assuming it also implements them. If so, why should it not be called an R5 framework? Thanks, Sahoo