Hi,
Sten Roger Sandvik schrieb:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
>
>> On 9/10/09 15:54, Sten Roger Sandvik wrote:
>>
>>> But it's also possible to have new httpservice under "http" directory
>>> (with
>>> version 2.0.0) and keep the old one for now under "http.jetty" dire
Hi,
Richard S. Hall schrieb:
> On 9/10/09 15:33, Sten Roger Sandvik wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Richard S.
>> Hallwrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 9/10/09 15:24, Sten Roger Sandvik wrote:
>>>
>>>
Yes, that would be the best thing for trunk. So, I propose we delete
http.jetty fo
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> On 9/10/09 15:54, Sten Roger Sandvik wrote:
>
>> But it's also possible to have new httpservice under "http" directory
>> (with
>> version 2.0.0) and keep the old one for now under "http.jetty" directory.
>>
>>
>
> Well, we certainly don't
On 9/10/09 15:54, Sten Roger Sandvik wrote:
But it's also possible to have new httpservice under "http" directory (with
version 2.0.0) and keep the old one for now under "http.jetty" directory.
Well, we certainly don't have to delete it immediately, but stop
developing it. Once we feel con
But it's also possible to have new httpservice under "http" directory (with
version 2.0.0) and keep the old one for now under "http.jetty" directory.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> On 9/10/09 15:33, Sten Roger Sandvik wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Richard
On 9/10/09 15:33, Sten Roger Sandvik wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Richard S. Hallwrote:
On 9/10/09 15:24, Sten Roger Sandvik wrote:
Yes, that would be the best thing for trunk. So, I propose we delete
http.jetty folder and import the new under http folder.
If i
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> On 9/10/09 15:24, Sten Roger Sandvik wrote:
>
>> Yes, that would be the best thing for trunk. So, I propose we delete
>> http.jetty folder and import the new under http folder.
>>
>>
>
> If it is still using Jetty, then why are we not just
On 9/10/09 15:24, Sten Roger Sandvik wrote:
Yes, that would be the best thing for trunk. So, I propose we delete
http.jetty folder and import the new under http folder.
If it is still using Jetty, then why are we not just keeping the
http.jetty module?
-> richard
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at
Yes, that would be the best thing for trunk. So, I propose we delete
http.jetty folder and import the new under http folder.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> In that case we can just replace the current impl (keeping the name), but
> call it version 2.0.0, no?
>
> -> rich
In that case we can just replace the current impl (keeping the name),
but call it version 2.0.0, no?
-> richard
On 9/10/09 15:19, Sten Roger Sandvik wrote:
To be cear: new http.jetty service should be a 100% dropin replacement for
the old http.jetty service. I think it's pretty close right now
To be cear: new http.jetty service should be a 100% dropin replacement for
the old http.jetty service. I think it's pretty close right now since the
actual implementation of new http.jetty bundle is almost the same code as
the old one.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Sten Roger Sandvik wrote:
>
The current http.jetty implementation is almost identical to the new
http/jetty implementation. So in my opinion it's not neccesarry to keep
implementing on the old one, unless it's some really good points in doing
so. So the folder could then be http (just use another version than
http.jetty).
Re
On 9/10/09 2:50, Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi all,
The IP Clearance vote period will soon end and we will be able to import
the HttpService contribution by Sten Roger Sandvik [1].
Looking at the current folders in the Felix trunk, I consider importing
the modules into a httpservice folder (we al
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The IP Clearance vote period will soon end and we will be able to import
> the HttpService contribution by Sten Roger Sandvik [1].
>
> Looking at the current folders in the Felix trunk, I consider importing
> the modules into
Hi all,
The IP Clearance vote period will soon end and we will be able to import
the HttpService contribution by Sten Roger Sandvik [1].
Looking at the current folders in the Felix trunk, I consider importing
the modules into a httpservice folder (we already have a http.jetty
project, which is th
15 matches
Mail list logo
