Re: Scala based OSGi shell (console and ssh)

2011-01-04 Thread Reto Bachmann-Gmuer
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > That looks awesome! > I'll create a karaf feature and give it a try. > great! > > Btw, I haven't seen the source code location for the > > mvn:org.apache.clerezza/org.apache.clerezza.shell.felixshellcommand/0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT > bundle

Re: Scala based OSGi shell (console and ssh)

2011-01-04 Thread Guillaume Nodet
That looks awesome! I'll create a karaf feature and give it a try. Btw, I haven't seen the source code location for the mvn:org.apache.clerezza/org.apache.clerezza.shell.felixshellcommand/0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT bundle, could you point me to it please ? I wanted to see if you do as in gogo, i.e. r

Scala based OSGi shell (console and ssh)

2011-01-03 Thread Reto Bachmann-Gmuer
Ok, it took me some time to actually implement the Scala based OSGi console. For an introduction see: http://incubator.apache.org/clerezza/getting-started/shell/ To try it out you may either download a recent launcher for clerezza from https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/

[jira] Resolved: (FELIX-2330) Uninstall, refresh, and resolve osgi shell commands do not support multiple bundle ids

2010-05-17 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
> Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Karaf >Affects Versions: karaf 1.6.0 >Reporter: Jarek Gawor >Assignee: Guillaume Nodet > Fix For: karaf 1.6.0 > > Attachments: FELIX-2330.patch > > > The unin

Re: OSGi Shell

2010-05-12 Thread Derek Baum
On 12 May 2010 15:39, Peter Kriens wrote: > > On 12 mei 2010, at 12:54, Derek Baum wrote: > > >> Any other items that should be taken care of? > > > > FELIX-1304: Better support for variables evaluation in arguments > > this introduced ${xxx} as an alternative way to expand variables, useful > if

Re: [cpeg] OSGi Shell

2010-05-12 Thread Glyn Normington
#x27;t already know if these are already provided, but two >>> critical requirements for the OSGi shell are: >>> >>> 1. tab completion of command syntax and parameters (such as bundle symbolic >>> names and version numbers) >>> 2. "up arrow" comm

Re: OSGi Shell

2010-05-12 Thread Peter Kriens
On 12 mei 2010, at 12:54, Derek Baum wrote: >> Any other items that should be taken care of? > > FELIX-1304: Better support for variables evaluation in arguments > this introduced ${xxx} as an alternative way to expand variables, useful if > they are adjacent to other text e.g. $HOMEXXX vs ${HOM

Re: [cpeg] OSGi Shell

2010-05-12 Thread Peter Kriens
y I don't already know if these are already provided, but two >> critical requirements for the OSGi shell are: >> >> 1. tab completion of command syntax and parameters (such as bundle symbolic >> names and version numbers) >> 2. "up arrow" command reca

Re: [cpeg] OSGi Shell

2010-05-12 Thread Glyn Normington
Thanks for the clarification. Glyn On 12 May 2010, at 12:05, Derek Baum wrote: On 12 May 2010 03:48, Glyn Normington mailto:gnorming...@vmware.com>> wrote: I'm sorry I don't already know if these are already provided, but two critical requirements for the OSGi shell are: 1

Re: OSGi Shell

2010-05-12 Thread Richard S. Hall
On 5/12/10 6:54, Derek Baum wrote: >9.#52 commands in osgi: scope need to be well defined. They're currently defined as the methods on the BundleContext ... Will work on this. The current commands in the osgi: scope in gogo include: methods on Bundle methods on BundleContext

Re: [cpeg] OSGi Shell

2010-05-12 Thread Derek Baum
On 12 May 2010 03:48, Glyn Normington wrote: > I'm sorry I don't already know if these are already provided, but two > critical requirements for the OSGi shell are: > > 1. tab completion of command syntax and parameters (such as bundle symbolic > names and versio

Re: OSGi Shell

2010-05-12 Thread Derek Baum
> Any other items that should be taken care of? FELIX-1304: Better support for variables evaluation in arguments this introduced ${xxx} as an alternative way to expand variables, useful if they are adjacent to other text e.g. $HOMEXXX vs ${HOME}XXX. Gogo now also implements the bash-like defaultin

Re: [cpeg] OSGi Shell

2010-05-11 Thread Glyn Normington
I'm sorry I don't already know if these are already provided, but two critical requirements for the OSGi shell are: 1. tab completion of command syntax and parameters (such as bundle symbolic names and version numbers) 2. "up arrow" command recall (preferably filtered

OSGi Shell

2010-05-11 Thread Peter Kriens
I am updated RFC 147 and prepare it for the meeting next week. I've got the following feedback so far: FELIX-1526 Replace <> embedded execution with (). Originally the () were used for filters. I am ok in making this change and not directly supporting filters. FELIX-1473 When the first argument

[jira] Updated: (FELIX-2330) Uninstall, refresh, and resolve osgi shell commands do not support multiple bundle ids

2010-05-07 Thread Jarek Gawor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jarek Gawor updated FELIX-2330: --- Attachment: FELIX-2330.patch Updates to uninstall, refresh, and resolve osgi shell commands to work

[jira] Created: (FELIX-2330) Uninstall, refresh, and resolve osgi shell commands do not support multiple bundle ids

2010-05-07 Thread Jarek Gawor (JIRA)
Uninstall, refresh, and resolve osgi shell commands do not support multiple bundle ids -- Key: FELIX-2330 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2330

[IP CLEARANCE] OSGi Shell

2009-05-28 Thread Richard S. Hall
The Apache Felix PMC request an IP check for the OSGi Shell contribution from Peter Kriens: http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/felix-osgi-shell.html Thank you. -> richard

Re: [Result][Proposal] OSGi shell donation

2009-02-26 Thread Marcel Offermans
On Feb 26, 2009, at 4:22 , Stuart McCulloch wrote: 2009/2/26 Marcel Offermans Summarizing the reactions on the list: +1: Richard S. Hall, Stuart McCulloch, Felix Meschberger and Marcel Offermans So I guess the next step is to run the IP clearance, like Felix suggested, and then start by i

Re: [Result][Proposal] OSGi shell donation

2009-02-25 Thread Stuart McCulloch
2009/2/26 Marcel Offermans > Summarizing the reactions on the list: > > +1: Richard S. Hall, Stuart McCulloch, Felix Meschberger and Marcel > Offermans > > So I guess the next step is to run the IP clearance, like Felix suggested, > and then start by importing the code and converting the packagin

Re: [Result][Proposal] OSGi shell donation

2009-02-25 Thread Karl Pauls
I'm +1 too Sorry for running late. regards, Karl On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Marcel Offermans wrote: > Summarizing the reactions on the list: > > +1: Richard S. Hall, Stuart McCulloch, Felix Meschberger and Marcel > Offermans > > So I guess the next step is to run the IP clearance, like F

[Result][Proposal] OSGi shell donation

2009-02-25 Thread Marcel Offermans
Summarizing the reactions on the list: +1: Richard S. Hall, Stuart McCulloch, Felix Meschberger and Marcel Offermans So I guess the next step is to run the IP clearance, like Felix suggested, and then start by importing the code and converting the packaging to the org.apache.felix namespa

Re: [Proposal] OSGi shell donation

2009-02-20 Thread Stuart McCulloch
ion, the donation can be found in FELIX-946: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-946 >> >> On Feb 20, 2009, at 17:25 , Marcel Offermans wrote: >> >> As some of you might already have seen, Peter Kriens just donated the >>> source code for th

Re: [Proposal] OSGi shell donation

2009-02-20 Thread Richard S. Hall
:25 , Marcel Offermans wrote: As some of you might already have seen, Peter Kriens just donated the source code for the new OSGi shell, as described in the early drafts for R4.2 (RFC-132). The idea is that this will be a shell that is shared by all OSGi implementations. I would like to include it

Re: [Proposal] OSGi shell donation

2009-02-20 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi Marcel, Marcel Offermans schrieb: > As some of you might already have seen, Peter Kriens just donated the > source code for the new OSGi shell, as described in the early drafts for > R4.2 (RFC-132). The idea is that this will be a shell that is shared by > all OSGi implementati

Re: [Proposal] OSGi shell donation

2009-02-20 Thread Marcel Offermans
Forgot to mention, the donation can be found in FELIX-946: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-946 On Feb 20, 2009, at 17:25 , Marcel Offermans wrote: As some of you might already have seen, Peter Kriens just donated the source code for the new OSGi shell, as described in the early

[Proposal] OSGi shell donation

2009-02-20 Thread Marcel Offermans
As some of you might already have seen, Peter Kriens just donated the source code for the new OSGi shell, as described in the early drafts for R4.2 (RFC-132). The idea is that this will be a shell that is shared by all OSGi implementations. I would like to include it in Apache Felix and