Hi Thomas,
On Apr 16, 2012 7:16 PM, "Thomas Calmant" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm not a Felix developer, but I'm also working on an integration of
> iPOJO in Eclipse.
> It seems that you manipulate the whole build directory each time,
> while you could bypass the problem by manipulating only re-compiled
Hi Clement,
On Apr 16, 2012 7:10 PM, "Clement Escoffier"
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We started looking at it. Guillaume did some work on it. So, first the
second evaluation of the annotations is definitely a bug. We're now trying
to be sure we're not breaking something somewhere (like the component
filte
Hi,
I'm not a Felix developer, but I'm also working on an integration of
iPOJO in Eclipse.
It seems that you manipulate the whole build directory each time,
while you could bypass the problem by manipulating only re-compiled
(fresh) class files, using a JDT compilation participant.
If you want to
Hi,
We started looking at it. Guillaume did some work on it. So, first the second
evaluation of the annotations is definitely a bug. We're now trying to be sure
we're not breaking something somewhere (like the component filter).
So you can be sure we will fix the issue. The patch or a slightly
Hi Devs,
Sorry for pressuring but this is blocker for us in ApacheDS. Could some one
please evaluate the issue and the patch? We really need to know whether
it'll be fixed or not?
Thanks,
Gokturk
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> As i was trying to integr
Hi Everyone,
As i was trying to integrate IPojo manipulation into eclipse environment, i
noticed re-manipulation without cleaning corrupts the MANIFEST file even
though it does not brake manipulated class files. Re-manipulated MANIFEST
is lacking some handler declarations and "manipulation" sectio
