Contributing to Felix

2017-05-31 Thread Mark Raynsford
Hello. Any chance anyone could look at PR #103? https://github.com/apache/felix/pull/103 Do I need to sign some sort of contributor agreement? M pgpPS15zhU5v8.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: contributing

2011-12-08 Thread j...@nanthrax.net
Hi Jerome, Maybe you can take a look on the Jira. Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://wwx.talend.com - Reply message - From: jerome moliere jerome.moli...@gmail.com To: dev@felix.apache.org Subject: contributing Date: Thu, Dec

Re: contributing

2011-12-08 Thread Richard S. Hall
If you have some particular subprojects that you like, then you can always look at JIRA issues against them or go to our wiki and create docs for them (nearly all of our subprojects could benefit from better/more documentation). For the docs, it is just the wiki site...you might be able to

Re: Contributing a custom list command

2010-03-08 Thread Oren Livne
Thanks so much, Richard. I followed your instructions. Please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2182 Oren Richard S. Hall wrote: You need to open a JIRA issue for this and attach the contribution to that...make sure to check the grant to Apache button. Thanks! - richard

Re: Contributing parts of the ServiceRegistry Hooks (RFC 126) implementation into Felix

2008-11-13 Thread David Bosschaert
Hi all, 2008/11/7 David Bosschaert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2008/11/4 Richard S. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I think it sounds reasonable. I am all for creating a JIRA issue with appropriate patch. Great. I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-804 where the patch will ultimately be

Re: Contributing parts of the ServiceRegistry Hooks (RFC 126) implementation into Felix

2008-11-13 Thread Richard S. Hall
I will try to take a look at it soon. - richard David Bosschaert wrote: Hi all, 2008/11/7 David Bosschaert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2008/11/4 Richard S. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I think it sounds reasonable. I am all for creating a JIRA issue with appropriate patch. Great. I've

Re: Contributing parts of the ServiceRegistry Hooks (RFC 126) implementation into Felix

2008-11-07 Thread David Bosschaert
2008/11/4 Richard S. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I think it sounds reasonable. I am all for creating a JIRA issue with appropriate patch. Great. I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-804 where the patch will ultimately be attached. I assume that since this is already in CXF svn

Re: Contributing parts of the ServiceRegistry Hooks (RFC 126) implementation into Felix

2008-11-05 Thread Marcel Offermans
Hello David, On Nov 4, 2008, at 17:33 , David Bosschaert wrote: In the context of the Apache CXF project a number of people have been involved in implementing the Distribution Software part of Distributed OSGi (RFC 119 [1]). [...] If Felix is interested in taking this implementation, it

Re: Contributing parts of the ServiceRegistry Hooks (RFC 126) implementation into Felix

2008-11-04 Thread Richard S. Hall
available in [1]). To keep us going we implemented certain bits of RFC 126 in a private copy of Felix in the CXF DOSGi buildsystem. However, we would like to use the real Felix, so we are interested in contributing our RFC 126 bits into Felix so we can use it straight from there. This is referenced

Re: Contributing parts of the ServiceRegistry Hooks (RFC 126) implementation into Felix

2008-11-04 Thread Stuart McCulloch
on the OSGi Service Registry Hooks (RFC 126, also available in [1]). To keep us going we implemented certain bits of RFC 126 in a private copy of Felix in the CXF DOSGi buildsystem. However, we would like to use the real Felix, so we are interested in contributing our RFC 126 bits into Felix so we can use