Re: Liquibase support

Alberto, Can you share your thoughts? Regards Victor El mar, 8 feb 2022 a las 4:19, Aleksandar Vidakovic (< chee...@monkeysintown.com>) escribió: > ... YAML, XML or JSON... all good for me... in the end very easy to > transform with Jackson in a one liner if someone needs a different > forma

Re: Liquibase support

... YAML, XML or JSON... all good for me... in the end very easy to transform with Jackson in a one liner if someone needs a different format... So, have no preference here... let's see what the community has to say... Cheers On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 10:56 AM Arnold Galovics wrote: > Hi Aleks, >

Re: Liquibase support

Hi Aleks, Good to know. Any preference for YAML versus XML format? Best, Arnold On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 10:43 AM Aleksandar Vidakovic < chee...@monkeysintown.com> wrote: > Hi Arnold, > > ... personally, I am looking forward to seeing this one happen... Postgres > support is one of the things th

Re: Liquibase support

Hi Arnold, ... personally, I am looking forward to seeing this one happen... Postgres support is one of the things that I hear people requesting more and more often. And having used Liquibase myself in other projects, I have to say that I find it a lot easier to use and much cleaner. One thing tha

Liquibase support

Hi everyone, I was scanning through some tickets and found FINERACT-984 : Postgres support. I'm glad this has been brought up already. I thought about some potential paths forward to support Postgres in Fineract, let me explain. First of all, I

Re: Arnold Galovics as reviewer...

Hi Petri, Thanks for the clarification. Makes sense. Best, Arnold On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 1:21 AM Aleksandar Vidakovic < chee...@monkeysintown.com> wrote: > Hi Petri, > > ... thanks for the update on this topic and sounds right to me... didn't > have it exactly on the radar anymore. > > Cheers >