Hey folks last year I tried to scramble the community about Fineract CN there was a lot of resistance but here I am presenting the same case that
If CN needs to keep up to date with the financial industry Fineract CN needs to change the architecture! That means going away from micro services to distributed architecture! That requires a leap of faith ! I would like to have a vote open call that ! How many think that Fineract Cn needs to evolve and Which areas it can go in terms of architecture please provide your thoughts and yes or no as final response ! If we have enough votes in that case we can go ahead with documentation process as defined any Apache Thanks folks -- Saransh Sharma Research Partner Sent from my phone This mail is governed by Muellners® IT policy. The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. All messages sent to and from this e-mail address may be monitored as permitted by applicable law and regulations to ensure compliance with our internal policies and to protect our business. E-mails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. You are deemed to have accepted these risks if you communicate with us by e-mail.
