Thanks kindly! Here's my "yes, and"...
James wrote:
> I think your question - who is this documentation for? is a very
> important one. I don't believe it should be for the end users, but rather
> it should be more focused on understanding the underlying functionality
> behind the 900+ apis, as
Hi Fineracters,
Opinionated responses inline..
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 9:13 PM James Dailey wrote:
> All - Bringing this back up.
>
> Thanks Adam. Documentation is definitely the last thing people seem to
> want to work on. How should we change this?
>
> Asking devs to "do more" doesn't seem
All - Bringing this back up.
Thanks Adam. Documentation is definitely the last thing people seem to
want to work on. How should we change this?
Asking devs to "do more" doesn't seem to be a successful strategy.
We should have it as one of the checkmarks on the "things to verify before
you mak
Great thoughts here James, thank you. I'll chime in because documentation
is one of the main reasons I'm here again today, thanks to Ed & Mifos.
James and I talked about this offline / off-list. I think the asciidoc in
fineract-doc/ is great and we can continue to incrementally improve it.
I've fo
Devs
I believe that we need a better set of documentation at this project. It
would be helpful if it comes more automatically as part of development
processes. Any ideas?
Currently the Fineract wiki pages are to manage the project and community
(with some legacy documentation) while the ascii do
