Re: FAQ on Wiki, structure of wiki

2019-03-12 Thread Rahul Goel
Hi James, Wiki looks great now. On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:27 AM Isaac Kamga wrote: > Hello James, > > You've done a very great job organizing those pages on Confluence. > > The entire Wiki looks new and feels refreshing. More grease to your elbows. > > Cheers, > Isaac Kamga. > > On Tue, Mar

Re: FAQ on Wiki, structure of wiki

2019-03-11 Thread Isaac Kamga
Hello James, You've done a very great job organizing those pages on Confluence. The entire Wiki looks new and feels refreshing. More grease to your elbows. Cheers, Isaac Kamga. On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 2:25 AM James Dailey wrote: > Hi All - > > I've made a bunch of changes to the navigation

Re: FAQ on Wiki, structure of wiki

2019-03-11 Thread James Dailey
Hi All - I've made a bunch of changes to the navigation and structure of the wiki. I'd like to know if I should deprecate additional pages. For example, are we still relying on the specifications under

Re: FAQ on Wiki, structure of wiki

2019-03-04 Thread James Dailey
Thanks Myrle - totally agree we don't want to have copy and paste going on. Jira tickets are canon. I immediately found that a macro insert works --> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/Test+page but only for infra tickets. I'll work on figuring this out. Thanks for the

Re: FAQ on Wiki, structure of wiki

2019-03-04 Thread Myrle Krantz
If you're going to be carrying over information from Jira, you should look into whether its possible to use the jira integration in confluence so that it can be done automatically. Then create shared filters on release numbers and you have "one source of truth" rather than spreading information

Re: FAQ on Wiki, structure of wiki

2019-03-03 Thread James Dailey
Hi Isaac -- Thanks for the input. I'd also like to have community members be able to more easily understand the needs and the priorities. Some of that, I hope, can be incorporated into the FAQ. At the risk of expanding this topic just a tad, there should be a norm for a newbie to: * Consult the

Re: FAQ on Wiki, structure of wiki

2019-03-03 Thread Isaac Kamga
Hello James, Thanks for the immense efforts you're putting into making the wiki more visible and supple. Besides being open source best practice, I think the community roadmap should be left there given it provides clarity to volunteers, puts open issues in context and doesn't coerce anyone with

Re: FAQ on Wiki, structure of wiki

2019-02-28 Thread Myrle Krantz
Hey James, The FAQ looks good. Really good. I like your proposed restructuring of the Wiki too. I would suggest two changes: * Leave a space for discussing/document architecture/design decisions. * Remove the roadmap. We are mostly volunteers. We shouldn't be making promises about future

Re: FAQ on Wiki, structure of wiki

2019-02-28 Thread Sendoro Juma
+1 > On February 28, 2019 at 2:51 AM James Dailey wrote: > > > Devs - > > I have noted a number of emails from people with basic questions about the > project and have tried to collate those into a FAQ. Please see my changes > to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/FAQ. If you >

Re: FAQ on Wiki, structure of wiki

2019-02-28 Thread Awasum Yannick
Hi James, The above structure is clearer than the current one. Thanks for providing more clarity to the project. On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 12:59 AM James Dailey wrote: > Devs - > > I have noted a number of emails from people with basic questions about the > project and have tried to collate

FAQ on Wiki, structure of wiki

2019-02-27 Thread James Dailey
Devs - I have noted a number of emails from people with basic questions about the project and have tried to collate those into a FAQ. Please see my changes to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/FAQ. If you object, either respond to this email or make comments on the page