Zack and Robert have been working on contributing a fix to add the ability
to reschedule a loan multiple times.
They have taken a different approach than what Pramod had previously
outlined so we wanted to discuss their proposed fix with Sander and his
team who have provided the initial fix to res
Sander, have you had a chance to review this thread?
Andris' team is in need of this feature and wanted to get feedback on the
approach they've taken to see if they can continue with that or they need
to follow the path that was proposed by Pramod.
Ed
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Ed Cable wr
Hi all
The main reason we put in the restrictions around allowing only one
reschedule, was to also enable users to undo them easily if they were made
by mistake. I think that is something that can be solved, but would require
a bit of extra work ensuring that the correct old schedules are grabbed
Hi Agris,
You can already do all of this by using the current datatables, where you
can add all fields necessary to the clients data that you want to capture.
So the update is not really a requirement to get this done, a large number
of MFI's are already using the system with all of these fields a
Hi all,
Ignore my response, I was responding to the wrong thread, and not paying
attention, still early here I guess...
In terms of rescheduling, I think the current solution would need to be
tested very carefully before it can be considered stable (or not), and
therefore I'd recommend doing that
@fineract.incubator.apache.org; robert
wizglobal ; Zack Wizglobal ;
pra...@confluxtechnologies.com Nuthakki ;
Andris Kaneps ; Philippe Storm ;
Markus Geiß ; Adi Raju
Subject: Re: Clarification on Validator Classes for Multiple Rescheduling of a
Loan
Good morning, gentlemen!
So where do we
..@watucredit.com> >; Markus Geiß mailto:mge...@mifos.org> >; Adi Raju mailto:adi.r...@confluxtechnologies.com> >
Subject: Re: Clarification on Validator Classes for Multiple Rescheduling of a
Loan
Good morning, gentlemen!
So where do we stand with this update? Ed, has your
ent:* 12 April 2016 13:14
> *To:* Sander van der Heyden
> *Cc:* Ed Cable ; dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org;
> robert wizglobal ; Zack Wizglobal <
> z...@wizglobal.co.ke>; pra...@confluxtechnologies.com Nuthakki <
> pra...@confluxtechnologies.com>; Andris Kaneps ;
> Philippe Storm ;
ouldn’t recommend current solution
>> to be merged.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Adi
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Agris Varpins [mailto:agris.varp...@mtgcapital.ch]
>> *Sent:* 12 April 2016 13:14
>> *To:* Sander van der Heyden
>> *Cc:*
;
pra...@confluxtechnologies.com Nuthakki ;
Philippe Storm ; Markus Geiß
Subject: Re: Clarification on Validator Classes for Multiple Rescheduling of a
Loan
Adi,
Now that the team has gotten through the QA for the most recent release, could
you have the QA team spend some time on
t; *Sent:* 12 April 2016 13:38
> *To:* Adi Raju
> *Cc:* Sander van der Heyden ; Ed Cable <
> edca...@mifos.org>; dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org; robert wizglobal <
> rob...@wizglobal.co.ke>; Zack Wizglobal ;
> pra...@confluxtechnologies.com Nuthakki ;
> Andris Kaneps
Storm
; Markus Geiß
Subject: Re: Clarification on Validator Classes for Multiple Rescheduling of a
Loan
Dear Adi, Sander, Pramod,
Did you have a chance to look into the matter below?
Regards,
Andris Kaneps
On 2016. gada 12. jūl., at 14:10, Andris Kaneps mailto:akan
21:49
>> To: Andris Kaneps
>> Cc: Agris Varpins ; Adi Raju
>> ; Sander van der Heyden
>> ; dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org; robert
>> wizglobal ; Zack Wizglobal ;
>> pra...@confluxtechnologies.com Nuthakki ;
>> Philippe Storm ; Markus Geiß
>>
13 matches
Mail list logo
