Hello,
I checked background processing of the app(on iPad) with renderMode set to
‘direct’. As Will mentioned, it does break the background processing. I had
to revert it back to ‘gpu’ and it worked fine. However, performance wise it
still remains comparatively faster even if I set the renderMode
Hi folks,
I'ved also had the same issues with the MobileTheme project of the SDK.
Tiago Lopes : Desenvolvedor - Flex / Flash
Fone: (85) 8896.4855
www.tiagolopes.pro.br
2013/8/28 Deepak MS
> Hello,
>
> I checked background processing of the app(on iPad) with renderMode set to
> ‘direct’. As Wil
Hi Deepak,
Those warning are there because of the import and use of the experimental
components. This is an already known issue :)
Nothing to worry about for now.
Regards,
SWEN VAN ZANTEN
Hoofdstraat 160
2171 BL, Sassenheim
Op 28 aug. 2013, om 14:04 heeft Deepak MS het
volgende geschreven:
In the FlexUnit repo right now there is only a master.
I am creating a develop branch presently and pushing some changes we made to
the flexunit tasks to support a URL instead of just a local file when executing
tests.
We should just make sure this gets integrated into master before the next
Today I tried to add flexunit to flexmojos.. 'sad to say it wasn't easy and
it still isn't working for me' (also using mockolate)if it's possible
I'd like to request a public repo for maven somewhere. The current links
for flexunit point to a 404 on github
On 28 Aug 2013 22:29, "Michael A. La
Great! .. I pushed my changes always to "makeFlexUnitApacheReady". Shall I
merge those changes also to develop branch and continue to work on this one?
Cyrill
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:29 AM, Michael A. Labriola <
labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
>
> In the FlexUnit repo right now there is
Hi
Last version of FlexUnit was 4.1 if I'm correct. Can somebody with rights
add two new version in JIRA?
* FlexUnit 4.1
* and als next version maybe FlexUnit 4.2 or FlexUnit Next?
Thanks
Cyrill
added
On 8/28/13 8:43 PM, "Cyrill Zadra" wrote:
>Hi
>
>Last version of FlexUnit was 4.1 if I'm correct. Can somebody with rights
>add two new version in JIRA?
>
>* FlexUnit 4.1
>* and als next version maybe FlexUnit 4.2 or FlexUnit Next?
>
>Thanks
>Cyrill
Thank you!
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> added
>
> On 8/28/13 8:43 PM, "Cyrill Zadra" wrote:
>
> >Hi
> >
> >Last version of FlexUnit was 4.1 if I'm correct. Can somebody with rights
> >add two new version in JIRA?
> >
> >* FlexUnit 4.1
> >* and als next version maybe Fl
Hi,
A small suggestion can we not use "FlexUnit Next" as after more than one
version has been released you don't know what version it was actually fixed in.
Thanks,
Justin
You mean for instance "FlexUnit 4.2" instead of "FlexUnit Next"? But which
number for next version should we use?
Cyrill
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A small suggestion can we not use "FlexUnit Next" as after more than one
> version has been released you don
Hi,
> You mean for instance "FlexUnit 4.2" instead of "FlexUnit Next"?
Yep.
> But which number for next version should we use?
4.2 is as good as any and the tag can be edited if it's not 4.2.
You could also rename "FlexUnit Next", but if you look at what happened with
the next tag for the Flex
I don't mind changing it to "FlexUnit 4.2". I just don't have the rights in
JIRA so if somebody with privileges can update version label.
Cyrill
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > You mean for instance "FlexUnit 4.2" instead of "FlexUnit Next"?
> Yep.
>
> > But
updated it.
On 8/28/13 10:16 PM, "Cyrill Zadra" wrote:
>I don't mind changing it to "FlexUnit 4.2". I just don't have the rights
>in
>JIRA so if somebody with privileges can update version label.
>
>Cyrill
>
>
>On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Justin Mclean
>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > You mean for
14 matches
Mail list logo
