Hi,
Can someone test out the fix I checked for this JIRA issue.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33630
Thanks,
Justin
I would expect the thing to blow up in my face ... yes :-)
Cause you would be mixing different Versions of libs ... I don't think that
would be a good idea.
If you however want to use a library (swc/rsl) however that should be possible
as Long as the rsl/swc doesn't rely on changed API. But if y
I've updated my projects to start building with your 6.0.1 version of FM. I
haven't had a chance to really get into it yet, but the first things I'm seeing
are these warnings. Any idea why, as I'm building against 4.10.0.20130801?
[WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex:compiler:pom:4.6.0.23201 i
HI,
> BTW, are there plans to make Falcon nightly builds available? I could try
> to compile our large app and report issues.
It's available here:
https://builds.apache.org/job/flex-falcon/ws/compiler/commandline/
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> Clever idea. I didn't try it but from looking at this diff, I wonder if
> it is ok to tie the number of decimal places to the step size.
In most cases (that I can think of) it is. It certainly better than what it's
currently doing.
> Couldn't there be a difference like stepping by whole
Hi,
After playing around with the command line arguments a bit, I was able
to compile nearly all framework SWCs using the Falcon compiler! Only
'spark' and 'experimental' don't compile and it looks like that has
mostly the same problems as 'spark', so I think we can safely say that
we're only the
Go for it, clearly it won't be the last error of this kind and glad that
Falcon is stricter than mxmlc.
BTW, are there plans to make Falcon nightly builds available? I could try
to compile our large app and report issues.
On 12 September 2013 15:49, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While trying
Hi,
While trying to get the mx components to compile using Falcon, I ran
into this error:
In List.as, line 1515 reads 'rowInfo.pop()', where rowInfo is an Array
defined in ListBase.as. Falcon complains "call to possibly undefined
method 'pop'". Further investigation shows that the problem comes f
Falcon likely has this same Logical OR Assignment bug:
https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bug&id=3617792
--Dasa
On Sep 12, 2013, at 3:39 AM, Darrell Loverin wrote:
> I'm looking for my next falcon bug. I could look at this one if you'd like.
>
>
> -Darrell
>
>
Thanks for the responses Chris. Yeah, FM is a beast to build. I can't say
enough "Thank Yous" for taking over the project.
So, my understanding was that FM had to be built against the version of the FDK
you wanted to use. I'm assuming this is incorrect. Has anyone tried using FM
6.0.1 with
Thanks for the link.
On 9/12/13 1:15 PM, "Dasa Paddock" wrote:
>Falcon likely has this same Logical OR Assignment bug:
>https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bug&id=3617792
>
>--Dasa
>
>On Sep 12, 2013, at 3:39 AM, Darrell Loverin wrote:
>
>> I'm looking for my next falcon bug. I could look
Well actually FM should build your application with any mavenized FDK you throw
at it. Unless something has changed in more recent Versions of Apache Flex. FM
automatically uses the Compiler Version it was compiled agains, if you don't
explicitly fix a Version by using the plugin dependency. Oth
Hi Erik
Some of them are already raised as JIRA [1].
regards
Cyrill
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLEX%20AND%20component%20%3D%20Falcon%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
Clever idea. I didn't try it but from looking at this diff, I wonder if
it is ok to tie the number of decimal places to the step size. Couldn't
there be a difference like stepping by whole dollars but wanting to show
cents, or maybe starting at some fractional value but stepping by whole
integers
Hi Group,
I have few skins for Iphone 5 and now i want to target for all ios
devices. Is there any way to do that or else i have to manually calculate
dpi, resolutions and do the scaling stuff?
--
Thanks and Regards,
JJain,
If you have knowledge, let others light their candles in it --Marg
So, found the problem, actually was on the library that encode images, took
so much time to render and break the app.
the built-in encoding is a safer.
Igor Costa
www.igorcosta.com
www.igorcosta.org
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Igor Costa wrote:
> Thanks, Om
Eric are you trying to reach this
https://github.com/igorcosta/ApacheFlexUIBuilder ?
Actually I'm still working on a more polish version later this summer in
southern hemisphere. I think it will fit on the next release of FalconJS
Best Regards
Igor Costa
www.ig
Yeah ... but in Flexmojos you can have a dependency of type "swc", "rsl" and
"caching". Depending on the type of dependency it loads different files from
maven "swc", "swf" or "swz". The test-cases utilizing the signed rsls have
dependencies of type "Caching" and therefore maven Looks for swz fi
Yes, please!
:-)
EdB
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Darrell Loverin wrote:
> I'm looking for my next falcon bug. I could look at this one if you'd like.
>
>
> -Darrell
>
>
> On 9/11/13 8:36 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>
>>On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Cyrill Zadra
>>wrote:
>>> For this
Actually, it saves only one compared to the original code. It also
save the declaration and possible assignment to a local variable, for
what it's worth.
EdB
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Darrell Loverin wrote:
> The local variable saves two lookups in rowIndicators. That would be
> enough
Oh, hold on, I missed your last commits... re-checking.
EdB
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Cyrill,
>
> How did you get this to work? I'm currently trying to run all SWCs
> through Falcon, but 'advancedgrids' gives me 2 errors and 3
> warnings...
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Thu,
Cyrill,
How did you get this to work? I'm currently trying to run all SWCs
through Falcon, but 'advancedgrids' gives me 2 errors and 3
warnings...
EdB
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Cyrill Zadra (JIRA) wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33301?page=com.atlassian
I was leaving it open a few days to see if any interface issues would present
itself. But It's fine I suppose. I'll fill out the information on it tonight.
I'll take a look at the ADG to see if it does and just add it to this issue
later on.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Justin Mcl
I'm looking for my next falcon bug. I could look at this one if you'd like.
-Darrell
On 9/11/13 8:36 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Cyrill Zadra
>wrote:
>> For this I already raised a JIRA -
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33716
>
>This looks to be
The local variable saves two lookups in rowIndicators. That would be
enough for me.
-Darrell
On 9/12/13 4:34 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>I'd go with:
>
>var rowIndicators:Object = cellSelectionIndicators[rowData.uid];
>if (rowIndicators && rowIndicators[columnIndex])
>{
> o = rowIndicators[c
Oh right.. cool! And ./mini_run.sh tests/components/AdvancedDataGrid/
passes with 0 fails :). Thanks.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> That null check is already in the first if-statement: &&
> rowIndicators[columnIndex]. If 'rowIndicators[columnIndex]' is null it
> wil
@Eric ... to your initial question.
For rapid prototyping try to consider using FlashBuilder 4.6 with "Design
View" or Flash Catalyst CS5.5 to generate your
visual SkinnableContainers or SkinnableComponents. Upgrading your visual
prototype to Apache Flex 4.10 can be done thereafter. At least, this
That null check is already in the first if-statement: &&
rowIndicators[columnIndex]. If 'rowIndicators[columnIndex]' is null it
will never enter the block with the assignment to 'o', therefor 'o'
can't be null.
EdB
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Cyrill Zadra wrote:
> Shouldn't there be an a
Shouldn't there be an additional null check?
o = rowIndicators[columnIndex];
if (o != null && o.parent)
o.parent.removeChild(o);
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> I'd go with:
>
> var rowIndicators:Object = cellSelectionIndicators[rowData.uid];
> if (rowIndicator
I'm afraid I'll get lost in the code and will spend too much time in
there. I currently don't have the cycles available to do a FalconJx
style drive, sorry.
EdB
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I might have time. You sure you don't want to try to fix it yourself?
>
> -Alex
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I ran the tests under tests/components/NumericStepper. No failures
> > reported.
>
> Think they are the mx ones you want to run:
> ./mini_run.sh tests/gumbo/components/NumericStepper
>
>
Ah sorry, got confused. Its 2AM here. I t
Hi,
> I ran the tests under tests/components/NumericStepper. No failures
> reported.
Think they are the mx ones you want to run:
./mini_run.sh tests/gumbo/components/NumericStepper
All pass btw and I've checked the code in.
> I see that there is a test_changes.sh script. How would I run that
10 and 100 works fine too.
I ran the tests under tests/components/NumericStepper. No failures
reported.
I see that there is a test_changes.sh script. How would I run that?
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I can confirm that the patch works. When
I'd go with:
var rowIndicators:Object = cellSelectionIndicators[rowData.uid];
if (rowIndicators && rowIndicators[columnIndex])
{
o = rowIndicators[columnIndex];
if (o.parent)
o.parent.removeChild(o);
delete rowIndicators[columnIndex];
if (!atLeastOneProperty(rowIndicators))
delete
Hi,
Looks much better.
Justin
definitely :D.. thanks..
and change it to ..
var columnIndicator:Sprite;
if (rowIndicators)
{
columnIndicator = rowIndicators[columnIndex];
if (columnIndicator != null)
{
o = columnIndicator;
if (o.parent)
o.parent.removeChild(o);
delete rowIndicators[columnIndex];
if (!atLeastOneProperty(rowInd
Hi,
Yep it may RTE if rowIndicators is null :-)
Justin
Hi,
Just a note some of the ADG fixes I done n the last couple of weeks dramatical
improve the performance of the ADG and DG with lots of columns and rows, in
some of the testing I did it may be an order of magnitude speed increase for
some operations (eg horizontal scrolling).
Of course it w
Anybody cares if I change that line from
var columnIndicator:Sprite;
if (rowIndicators && (columnIndicator = rowIndicators[columnIndex]))
{
to
var columnIndicator:Sprite = rowIndicators[columnIndex];
if (rowIndicators && columnIndicator != null)
{
Cyrill
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Er
Hi,
> I am looking at it now... I cant keep up with you, though. Please go take
> a break :-)
You're safe for a few hours, it's beer o'clock here :-)
I've actually run into that issue a few times. While not the most important
bug it is sort of funny it's been outstanding for 7 years :-)
Just
Hi,
> I can confirm that the patch works. When I click on the stepper buttons,
> it does not show the decimal point or extra digits.
> Also confirmed that if I set stepSize=0.1, the expected behavior works as
> well.
Could you try a step size of 10 or 100? I tested this here but obviously could
I am looking at it now... I cant keep up with you, though. Please go take
a break :-)
Om
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What I assume is the oldest outstanding bugs in JIRA is:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-369
>
> Raised way back in the Flex 2
Hi,
What I assume is the oldest outstanding bugs in JIRA is:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-369
Raised way back in the Flex 2 days, surprisingly it's still an issue in Apache
Flex 4.10!
Anyone want to have a go at fixing a bug that's been outstanding for 7 years?
:-)
Thanks,
Justi
I can confirm that the patch works. When I click on the stepper buttons,
it does not show the decimal point or extra digits.
Also confirmed that if I set stepSize=0.1, the expected behavior works as
well.
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks, much
Hi,
Just to put it into context 380 odd issues have been resolved from that same
set which means we've resolved about 60% of issues that people have raised. We
could probably do better but I'm reasonably sure that's better than resolution
rate of issues when Flex was with Adobe.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
Thanks, much appreciated, and of course I meant NumericStepper not
NumericSpinner :-)
Justin
46 matches
Mail list logo
