Re: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Alex Harui
On 10/18/13 5:45 PM, "João Fernandes" wrote: >Chrome Flash Pepper reports >V1 0.891s >V2 0.828s >V3 0.276s > >Great results! This will clearly improve large ArrayCollections >deserialization! Thank you for this! True, but implementing IUID should still be faster. And lazy deserialization even

Re: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread João Fernandes
Chrome Flash Pepper reports V1 0.891s V2 0.828s V3 0.276s Great results! This will clearly improve large ArrayCollections deserialization! Thank you for this! On 19 October 2013 01:12, Maurice Amsellem wrote: > Forgot about this :-( > You are right, FF is running debugger version of FP, so tha

RE: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
Forgot about this :-( You are right, FF is running debugger version of FP, so that explains the difference. Thanks for the check. BTW, thanks also for the static recycled ByteArray idea, this is an easy and efficient optimization that I could also use in my own code. Maurice -Message d'

Re: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Mark Kessler
I know but I wasn't expecting that much while still using my debug player. On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > A release SWF should outperform a debug SWF, so that's expected. > > On 10/18/13 5:07 PM, "Mark Kessler" wrote: > > >That newer link gives me faster results... lol >

Re: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Alex Harui
A release SWF should outperform a debug SWF, so that's expected. On 10/18/13 5:07 PM, "Mark Kessler" wrote: >That newer link gives me faster results... lol > >1.71s >1.54s >0.903s > > > >On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Maurice Amsellem < >maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote: > >> I tried already

Re: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Alex Harui
I assume you double-checked in flashplayerversion.com that FF is running a release player? It could be that bytearray got optimized over time as it was a key piece of gaming strategy and Alchemy. -Alex On 10/18/13 5:04 PM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote: >FYI, I tried with Chrome (FP 11.9) and Firef

Re: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Mark Kessler
That newer link gives me faster results... lol 1.71s 1.54s 0.903s On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Maurice Amsellem < maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote: > I tried already and the results are consistent. > > Here is the link: > > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12169005/ApacheFlex/TestUI

RE: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
Thanks Alex. -Message d'origine- De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : samedi 19 octobre 2013 02:05 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: UID performance Thanks for providing the release SWF. For me the results are even better: Win7 Chrome FP11.8 release player 1.39s 1.29s

Re: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Alex Harui
Thanks for providing the release SWF. For me the results are even better: Win7 Chrome FP11.8 release player 1.39s 1.29s 0.430s That's better than 2x, more like 3x where in the debugger player it wasn't quite 2x. Excellent job! -Alex On 10/18/13 4:58 PM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote: >I tried al

RE: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
FYI, I tried with Chrome (FP 11.9) and Firefox (FP 11.4) and the results are quite different: Chrome FP 11.9: 1.29 1.24 0.405 FireFox FP 11.4: 2.16 1.93 1.07 Is the difference expected ? That is, is FP 11.9 twice as fast as FP 11.4, or is it just for these computations. Maurice -Message

RE: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
I tried already and the results are consistent. Here is the link: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12169005/ApacheFlex/TestUIDPerf_release.swf Maurice -Message d'origine- De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : samedi 19 octobre 2013 01:56 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet :

RE: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
> Scout is currently free with the free Creative Cloud account last time I > checked. I have subscribed for free to Creative Cloud and installed Scout. Great tool (and nice looking). Thanks for the info. Maurice -Message d'origine- De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]

Re: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Alex Harui
Actually, I thought of one more test that needs to be run which I don't have time to do right now: Release player with release SWF. Sometimes you can get very different results on the debugger players. Thanks, -Alex On 10/18/13 4:53 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >Yup, V3 wins on mac and windows for

Re: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Alex Harui
Yup, V3 wins on mac and windows for me. Thanks for doing it. -Alex On 10/18/13 4:45 PM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote: >I have posted FB project with the source s + compiled SWF. > >https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12169005/ApacheFlex/TestUIDPerf.fxp >https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12169005

RE: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
Ok thanks. When running with Chrome, I am getting other figures: 1.3 1.26 0.42 That's weird !! -Message d'origine- De : Mark Kessler [mailto:kesslerconsult...@gmail.com] Envoyé : samedi 19 octobre 2013 01:51 À : Dev@Flex Objet : Re: UID performance 2.11s 1.93s 1.32s On Fri, Oct 18

RE: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
Sorry, I don't see what you got. Is there a screenshot or something ? -Message d'origine- De : Mark Kessler [mailto:kesslerconsult...@gmail.com] Envoyé : samedi 19 octobre 2013 01:51 À : Dev@Flex Objet : Re: UID performance I ran the swf file from your link and I got these... On Fri,

Re: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Mark Kessler
2.11s 1.93s 1.32s On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Mark Kessler wrote: > I ran the swf file from your link and I got these... > > >

Re: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Mark Kessler
I ran the swf file from your link and I got these... On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Maurice Amsellem < maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote: > I have posted FB project with the source s + compiled SWF. > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12169005/ApacheFlex/TestUIDPerf.fxp > https://dl.drop

RE: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
I have posted FB project with the source s + compiled SWF. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12169005/ApacheFlex/TestUIDPerf.fxp https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12169005/ApacheFlex/TestUIDPerf.swf Algorithm 1= Original Algorithm 2 = using Array.join() and other optimizations by JMcLean Alg

RE: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
I have used a static ByteArray as suggested: much better. Thanks for the suggestion. -Message d'origine- De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com] Envoyé : samedi 19 octobre 2013 00:49 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : RE: UID performance Sure, I will do that. I will al

RE: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
Sure, I will do that. I will also post the source so that you can recompile at your convenience. Maurice -Message d'origine- De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : samedi 19 octobre 2013 00:13 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: UID performance I'm a bit surprised that B

Re: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Alex Harui
I'm a bit surprised that ByteArray.writeByte is faster but maybe Array.join isn't that fast. I would also like to see a test of a single static bytearray and resetting it and/or overwriting the old bytes. Maybe if you put a SWF with various algorithms in your people.a.o folder folks can hit it an

RE: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
Any answer ? -Message d'origine- De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com] Envoyé : vendredi 18 octobre 2013 14:39 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : RE: UID performance Hi, I shouldn't have mixed the two options, because it's confusing. Actually, V3 option generates upp

Re: iOS 7 Flex 4.10 AIR 3.9.1030 - Status bar overlays action bar

2013-10-18 Thread Swen van Zanten
It's not a bug in ios, air or flex.. It's just flex not being compatible with ios 7 skin and layout. iOS 7 uses The whole screen, unlike previous versions of iOS. There should be a default padding in The actionbar for iOS 7. Or an iOS 7 mobile skin or something. Met vriendelijke groet, Swen van

Wiki additions / changes / Needs work

2013-10-18 Thread Mark Kessler
1. We should check if we can copy the ASDOC wiki from adobe to add to our wiki. Would be a good starting point for us. I get the impression we will be modifying it down the road and it would be nice to have what's already there. 2. Things like the RAT-Check, I see a small blurb out a few requi

Re: iOS 7 Flex 4.10 AIR 3.9.1030 - Status bar overlays action bar

2013-10-18 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Oct 18, 2013 1:38 PM, "Frank Altomare" wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > I've seen a couple of posts related to this floating around on the Adobe > forums but they seem to be talking about the AIR 3.9 beta so I'm wondering > if this is a Flex related issue. > > In my iOS app after upgrading to Flex

RE:iOS 7 Flex 4.10 AIR 3.9.1030 - Status bar overlays action bar

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
Hi, This is obviously not a Flex bug but related to AIR and iOs 7 Didi you try the workaround that is described in the adobe forum ? Info.plist "UIViewControllerBasedStatusBarAppearance" and set it to "NO" ... http://forums.adobe.com/message/5762350 Maurice __

iOS 7 Flex 4.10 AIR 3.9.1030 - Status bar overlays action bar

2013-10-18 Thread Frank Altomare
Hey everyone, I've seen a couple of posts related to this floating around on the Adobe forums but they seem to be talking about the AIR 3.9 beta so I'm wondering if this is a Flex related issue. In my iOS app after upgrading to Flex 4.10 and AIR 3.9.1030 (release version) the iOS status bar now o

Re: Installer changes to go with 4.11?

2013-10-18 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Erik and Maurice. You guys are awesome. Thanks for figuring this out. I will incorporate this into the Installer app very soon. Alex, I think we are good for now. Thanks for offering to help. Regards, Om On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Maurice Amsellem < maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.11.0 release candidate 2

2013-10-18 Thread Alex Harui
+1 (binding) Source kit built on Windows Mustella -all passed on Windows Sigs match for zip and tar.gz Ran Diff against RC1 so rat.report should carryover -Alex On 10/17/13 4:30 PM, "Mark Kessler" wrote: >+1 (binding) > >Win7 64bit, 11.8 Global, 3.8 air. > >* Built SDK successfully. >* checkin

RE: Installer changes to go with 4.11?

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
Didn't find anything. I give up. After all, we have a download code that works... Maurice -Message d'origine- De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com] Envoyé : vendredi 18 octobre 2013 17:40 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : RE: Installer changes to go with 4.11? Sorr

Re: [FlexJS] New Wiki Writeup

2013-10-18 Thread Frank Wienberg
You should also have a look at StageXL (formerly known as DartFlash), since Dart compiles to JavaScript. It is based on the Flash DisplayList, but not an exact implementation of the Flash API. For JooFlash, I sometimes had a glance at their code, and their project is still

RE: Installer changes to go with 4.11?

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
Sorry, URLRequest is private, but URLConnection and HttpURLConnection are available. Looking into it now... Maurice -Message d'origine- De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com] Envoyé : vendredi 18 octobre 2013 17:33 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : RE: Installer chan

RE: Installer changes to go with 4.11?

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
When executing the ant get task in verbose mode it says the following (see below). So it handles the redirection properly. I have checked the source of Get task, it's very simple and relies entirely on java URLConnection. get Getting: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/osmf.adobe/OSMF%20

Re: Installer changes to go with 4.11?

2013-10-18 Thread Alex Harui
Sounds like you have something to try, so I'm not going to investigate. Let me know if that's not true. -Alex On 10/18/13 7:51 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >On Oct 18, 2013 1:31 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >> >> Funny thing is these URLs succeed when used with the ant 'get' task. I >> recen

Re: Installer changes to go with 4.11?

2013-10-18 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Oct 18, 2013 1:31 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: > > Funny thing is these URLs succeed when used with the ant 'get' task. I > recently put the one I posted before in 'downloads.xml' to fix an > issue with the previous URL and it has been working fine since... > > EdB > That is what I was wondering

Re: Installer updates

2013-10-18 Thread Nick Collins
I just logged the bug to JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33831 It appears to be failing to untar the AIRSDK 3.9 archive, for whatever reason. It works as expected with AIRSDK 3.8, so it isn't a permissions issue. On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > A

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.11.0 release candidate 2

2013-10-18 Thread Igor Costa
+1 Binding Igor Costa www.igorcosta.com www.igorcosta.org On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Mark Kessler wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Win7 64bit, 11.8 Global, 3.8 air. > > * Built SDK successfully. > * checkintests successful. > * Compiled test applications with sdk fro

Re: Installer compile on linux

2013-10-18 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Well it works (only just), that Linux package still needs a bit of work. Just checking in now. Justin

Re: Installer compile on linux

2013-10-18 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I had AIR_HOME pointing to AIR 2.6 and I edited the app xml file to have the > AIR 2.6 namespace. Anything else I need to change? Sorted seems the air-config in the SDK need to have 2.6 as well. Not sure if that is a bug or not. Thanks, Justin

RE: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
Hi, I shouldn't have mixed the two options, because it's confusing. Actually, V3 option generates uppercase, exactly as the current UUID, and it's 2x faster. So let's forget about V4... Here is the code: private static const HEX_CHARS:String = "0123456789ABCDEF"; private static const D

Re: Installer compile on linux

2013-10-18 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Just change it to 2.6 and compile. I had AIR_HOME pointing to AIR 2.6 and I edited the app xml file to have the AIR 2.6 namespace. Anything else I need to change? Thanks, Justin

Re: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > V3: generates the random hex bytes one by one, and writes them to the BA > V4: generates 4 or 8 random bytes in one shot, and writes them to the BA > (hexa in lowercase, to avoid call toUppercase() ) Probably best not too fiddle too much with the UID construction. While I can't think of a

Re: Installer compile on linux

2013-10-18 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Oct 18, 2013 2:06 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > > Hi, > > While waiting for the plane I gave compiling the Linux installer a quick go. > > Not 100% what has changed but got this: > > packageair: > [echo] Using cert ./cert/installapacheflex_self.p12 > [java] /home/justinmclean/flex-util

RE: Installer changes to go with 4.11?

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
Hi, Thanks you for the code. I tried it in France, and it found the "freefr" mirror and downloaded the swc successfully from this mirror. That's cool! Maurice -Message d'origine- De : Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl] Envoyé : vendredi 18 octobre 2013 13:36 À : dev@flex.ap

Re: Installer changes to go with 4.11?

2013-10-18 Thread Erik de Bruin
Ok, check this out: http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"; xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark" xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx"> Have fun! EdB On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > That's alright. > > I'

RE: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
Hi , I have tried out of curiosity other optimizations, such as using ByteArray to generate the string. I have two variants: V3: generates the random hex bytes one by one, and writes them to the BA V4: generates 4 or 8 random bytes in one shot, and writes them to the BA (hexa in lowercase, to

Re: Installer changes to go with 4.11?

2013-10-18 Thread Erik de Bruin
That's alright. I'm now looking into finding the closest mirror and using that instead of a hard coded one... EdB On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Maurice Amsellem wrote: > Sorry, there is a misunderstanding because I sent two emails in a row, one > with all the headers, and another one with

RE: Installer changes to go with 4.11?

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
Sorry, there is a misunderstanding because I sent two emails in a row, one with all the headers, and another one with the Referer header only. I just wanted to make sure you were using the latter. Maurice -Message d'origine- De : Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl] Envoyé : vend

Re: Installer changes to go with 4.11?

2013-10-18 Thread Erik de Bruin
Hi Maurice, What else am I using besides the referrer? I tried to code as close as I could to your example lines... EdB On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Maurice Amsellem wrote: > Cool. > > Try the simplified version with the referrer only. > > Now, this can be combined with Om's refresh me

RE: Installer changes to go with 4.11?

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
Cool. Try the simplified version with the referrer only. Now, this can be combined with Om's refresh meta data parsing to automatically detect the closest mirror, and not hard code it. Maurice -Message d'origine- De : Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl] Envoyé : vendredi 18

Re: Installer changes to go with 4.11?

2013-10-18 Thread Erik de Bruin
That's it. Excellent work, Maurice! Here is a slightly modified source example that works for me: http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"; xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark" xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx"> EdB On Fri, Oct

RE: Installer changes to go with 4.11?

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
Actually, it only checks the referrer, so here is a simplified version that works as well: var loader:URLLoader = new URLLoader(); var req:URLRequest = new URLRequest( "http://freefr.dl.sourceforge.net/project/osmf.adobe/OSMF%202.0%20Release%20%28final%20sourc

RE: Installer changes to go with 4.11?

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
Hi, I have sniffed the URL with chrome and replicated everything. The download is SUCESSFUL: Here is the code (it might be simplified, probably some headers can be removed) var loader:URLLoader = new URLLoader(); var req:URLRequest = new URLRequest( "http://f

Re: Installer changes to go with 4.11?

2013-10-18 Thread Erik de Bruin
You can set 'userAgent' on URLRequest. When I set it to a random string, it didn't make a difference. When I set it to "Java/1.6.0_51" - the same as a request from ant is using on my system - I at least get a status 302 (redirect) from the URLLoader... and an error ;-) Looking further... EdB O

Re: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, See http://gaming.adobe.com/technologies/scout/ "For a limited time, you can get Scout as part of a free Creative Cloud membership." Get it while you can :-) Justin

AW: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread christofer.d...@c-ware.de
It's allways free? ... ok then this doesn't suck at all ;-) At least it explains why I coulnd't find a package in which I could purchase it. Von: Justin Mclean [jus...@classsoftware.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Oktober 2013 11:08 An: dev@flex.apache.org Bet

AW: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread christofer.d...@c-ware.de
I am currently using the 30 Day Trial of the Creative Cloud Service. In gengeral it seems possible to "purchase" Scout as part of the All In package, but I couldn't find a way to purchase it separately. So that sucks :-( Chris Von: Maurice Amsellem [ma

Re: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I don't have Scout :-( Scout is currently free with the free Creative Cloud account last time I checked. Thanks, Justin

Installer compile on linux

2013-10-18 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, While waiting for the plane I gave compiling the Linux installer a quick go. Not 100% what has changed but got this: packageair: [echo] Using cert ./cert/installapacheflex_self.p12 [java] /home/justinmclean/flex-utilities/installer/src/InstallApacheFlex-app.xml: error 305: Intial

Re: Installer changes to go with 4.11?

2013-10-18 Thread Erik de Bruin
>From [1]: "Our download redirection can handle downloads via scripts, this is done via 302 redirects, please ensure that the download system you are using can follow those redirects, and also make sure that it is not sending a User Agent designed to look like a browser's User Agent (if the User A

Re: Installer changes to go with 4.11?

2013-10-18 Thread Erik de Bruin
Funny thing is these URLs succeed when used with the ant 'get' task. I recently put the one I posted before in 'downloads.xml' to fix an issue with the previous URL and it has been working fine since... EdB On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Maurice Amsellem wrote: >>The AIR app will actually f

RE: Installer changes to go with 4.11?

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
BTW, there is also a "Referer" in the request header, that points to the original URL , so maybe it's also checking this, to make sure you don't use the direct link -Message d'origine- De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com] Envoyé : vendredi 18 octobre 2013 10:26 À

RE: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
I don't have Scout :-( I have a premium FlashBuilder 4.7 licence. Does it come with it, or is it a separate purchase? Maurice -Message d'origine- De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com] Envoyé : vendredi 18 octobre 2013 10:08 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: UID perfor

RE: Installer changes to go with 4.11?

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
>The AIR app will actually follow the redirect. But it looks like on the first >hit they are setting a cookie and looking for the cookie before downloading >the >real file. If not, they simply redirect to the downloads page for a five >second wait. And they do it because they want to show ads

Re: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Well 10% or so is better than nothing. Mind running though scout may be that getTime is more expensive on windows and skewing the results a little? I vaguely recall something about that in the past. I tested on OSX. Thanks, Justin

RE: Installer changes to go with 4.11?

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
Yeah, you are right. I tried the mirror url and still gets HTML page. :-( Maurice -Message d'origine- De : omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] De la part de OmPrakash Muppirala Envoyé : vendredi 18 octobre 2013 09:49 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Installer changes to go

Re: Installer changes to go with 4.11?

2013-10-18 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Maurice Amsellem < maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote: > Hi, maybe that's obvious , as I am not an HTTP expert at all, > > but the HTML content returned has a meta http-equiv "refresh", that > reloads the pages 5 seconds later with the mirror URL (see below) > >

RE: Installer changes to go with 4.11?

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
Sorry, I have overlooked that the meta http refresh was in a tag, which means it's only run if javascript is disabled. So the redirection is probably done in javascript. But the option of parsing the redirect URL is still valid :-) Maurice -Message d'origine- De : Maurice Amsellem [m

RE: Installer changes to go with 4.11?

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
Hi, maybe that's obvious , as I am not an HTTP expert at all, but the HTML content returned has a meta http-equiv "refresh", that reloads the pages 5 seconds later with the mirror URL (see below) So it's not doing redirect. Maybe we could parse the content and grab that URL, then send another

Re: Installer changes to go with 4.11?

2013-10-18 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
You are probably correct, but every 'direct link' I tried seems to redirect to the same page which redirects to the actual mirror. In fact the link I am using was a 'direct link' to a mirror site. I am not sure if the downloads.xml link is correct either. Thanks, Om On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:

Re: Installer changes to go with 4.11?

2013-10-18 Thread Alex Harui
OK, will look tomorrow. I thought this kind of URL always returns an HTML page with a separate link to the mirror's url. I think in some of our scripts I bake in some mirror's URL, which probably isn't the "best" thing in the world to do, but seems to work. -Alex On 10/17/13 11:52 PM, "OmPrakas

RE: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
Here is the code for the test: public class UIDUtilTest { static private const COUNT:int = 10; [Test] public function benchCallNCreateUID_Original():void { var res:String; for (var i:int = 0; i < COUNT; i++) res = UIDUtil_Orig.createUID(); }

RE: UID performance

2013-10-18 Thread Maurice Amsellem
Hi, I have created simple test suite (in FlexUnit) with original and new method functions, calling 100K times createUID and the results are different for me: -debug=true: Old createUID : 2.652s New createUID: 2.382s -debug=false, optimize=true Old createUID : 2.11s New createUID: 1.878s Confi