Re: [FlexJS] JS Linting

For sure we should use it, the question is whether it should fail the build if we get lint errors, and I'm not sure how to get it to use strict mode from a script. On 11/22/13 1:02 PM, "Peter Ent" wrote: >I recall the Erik recommended using it. I'll have to get a copy and see >why types of thing

Re: [FlexJS] JS Linting

I recall the Erik recommended using it. I'll have to get a copy and see why types of things it is complaining about. My instinct is to suggest using it, but having experienced gjslint, I'm a little wary of over doing it. --peter On 11/22/13 3:46 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >I'm finishing up build s

[FlexJS] JS Linting

I'm finishing up build scripts for the flex-asjs repo. Should we/can we put linting into the build? I tried running JSHint from the command-line by feeding it a ‹config option, but we get tons of "Missing "use strict" statement" errors apparently because JSHint says that if you are going to use t

RE: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #382

Thanks, Except for the Android issue that Om has reported (which is probably fixed now), there are two outstanding bugs/limitations: 1) occluding is not handled properly while editing text (works well when not editing): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33911 => I think I will be ab

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #382

OK, so we should see the mustella server pass as well. Thanks for all your hard work on ScrollingStageText. Good luck getting all the last bugs out of it. -Alex On 11/22/13 11:28 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote: >I run the whole ActionBar suite, with AIR 3.9, and has not fails! > >Excellent. > >

RE: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #382

I run the whole ActionBar suite, with AIR 3.9, and has not fails! Excellent. Thanks Alex for the hint Maurice -Message d'origine- De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : vendredi 22 novembre 2013 19:42 À : dev@flex.apache.org; Erik de Bruin Cc : Mark Kessler; jmcl...@apache

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #382

The png.xml files can be sensitive to what else runs before it. Did you run the entire ActionBar folder? ./mini_run.sh -mobile tests/mobile/components/ActionBar/ If you still get a bad.png.xml, post it so I can see the differences. -Alex On 11/22/13 10:07 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote: >I ru

RE: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #382

I run mustella tests with current SDK (develop) and AIR 3.9, using your new XML DL file. The tests failed as before, But what is surprising, is that the XML files have a lot of differences (except for the ScrollingStageTextInputSkin tags which are the same). See by yourself: https://www.dropbox.

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #382

Sorry, you're right. AIR 3.4. Anyway, I didn't realize there was already a png.xml for it. I updated the png.xml with the ScrollingStageTextInputSkin. Let's see if it passes on the next run. -Alex On 11/22/13 8:54 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote: >Is FP also used in air mobile app? > >I though

RE: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #382

Is FP also used in air mobile app? I thought it used airglobal.swc only? Maurice -Message d'origine- De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : vendredi 22 novembre 2013 17:47 À : dev@flex.apache.org; Erik de Bruin Cc : Mark Kessler; jmcl...@apache.org Objet : Re: Build failed

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #382

This test passes for me with FP 11.1. On 11/22/13 7:48 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote: >Eric, > >Here is what I did: > >- running with the latest SDK a standalone mobile air app (not mustella) >that displays an action bar with embedded font and underline => no >artifact >- running current mustell

RE: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #382

Eric, Here is what I did: - running with the latest SDK a standalone mobile air app (not mustella) that displays an action bar with embedded font and underline => no artifact - running current mustella test mobile/Action with current SDK => artifact is there - running current mustella test mob

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #382

Well, my records show this test started failing on Nov. 18th. EdB On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Maurice Amsellem wrote: > Hi, I showed evidence this issue was already present in SDK 4.10 and 4.11. > So it's not caused by the fix on mobile TextInput. > > Maurice > > -Message d'origine---

RE: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #382

Hi, I showed evidence this issue was already present in SDK 4.10 and 4.11. So it's not caused by the fix on mobile TextInput. Maurice -Message d'origine- De : Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl] Envoyé : vendredi 22 novembre 2013 15:36 À : dev@flex.apache.org Cc : Mark Kessler; jm

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #382

Hi, since the Mustella VM seems to have settled down now, I think we can confidently say this failure needs to be addressed - it is not an artifact of the build machine. Anyone? EdB On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:26 PM, wrote: > See

Re: Problem in converting ArrayCollection to Array

This sounds like a classic example of the source being changed/not changed, and forgetting to call update on the item renderers. How exactly do you know that items from the array are missing? brought to you by the letters A, V, and I and the number 47 On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Miguel Fe

RE: Mobile TextInput Implementation status

Hi, I fixed the two issues that were reported in the JIRA ticket by Colins Childs. fixed two issues reported above: - two focused text inputs - stage text floating above content. Committed and pushed to develop branch https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flex-sdk.git;a=commit;h=9e4bf21f M

RE: Problem in converting ArrayCollection to Array

you are setting the reference so try to clone it. the source have always all the correct elements. Even when you sort or you have a filter. So must be another action that is removing your items. > From: seema.mak...@aricent.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 15:22:51 +0530 >

Re: Problem in converting ArrayCollection to Array

On 22/11/2013 09:47, Seema Makkar wrote: For make it pagable I need to convert ArrayCollection to array. So you are using ArrayCollection.source ? After conversion some elements are removed. Which ones ? How to resolve this issue. The same way we help everyone - post a minimal work code exam

RE: Problem in converting ArrayCollection to Array

I have used ArrayCollection.source but it remove some elements -Original Message- From: Miguel Ferreira [mailto:miguel.cd.ferre...@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 3:21 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: RE: Problem in converting ArrayCollection to Array there is no need to m

RE: Problem in converting ArrayCollection to Array

there is no need to make a conversation on the array collection use the property source > From: seema.mak...@aricent.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 15:17:45 +0530 > Subject: Problem in converting ArrayCollection to Array > > Hello All, > > I have created PagableArraycoll

Problem in converting ArrayCollection to Array

Hello All, I have created PagableArraycollection Class. For make it pagable I need to convert ArrayCollection to array. After conversion some elements are removed. How to resolve this issue. Thanks, Seema === Please