We're seeing lots of complaints about bad downloads during the install.
The current caching code in the installer caches whatever gets downloaded.
I'm going to introduce more MD5 checks into the install scripts and in
order to make it work even for Ant users, I think I should change the
installer
Actually, that sounds like the proper way to do it. The more actions we can
take out of the installer and into the scripts, the more control and
flexibility we gain.
+1
EdB
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
We're seeing lots of complaints about bad
Ok, one week later, there are 43 (!) tests failing:
http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/926/consoleText
If not all of the SDK committers from the past month or so take their
responsibility and fix/revert, I'll start and veto the commits in reverse
order, until we pass all
This build had been stuck on the VM for 2+ days. There was a very
non-descript dialog up complaining about an RTE in CS5. I've dismissed it
and stopped the build. The other builds in the queue seem to pick up fine,
so I'll let them run.
EdB
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 9:23 AM,
So it is not an anomaly that only happens to me.
thanks
2014-05-26 22:44 GMT+02:00 Greg Dove greg.d...@gmail.com:
I have seen the same thing with Appstore (non-adhoc) builds working on test
devices. I *thought* this did not work in the past but yes it seems to be
working now, at least for
What EdB said ;-)
Tom
On 27/05/14 07:09, Alex Harui wrote:
We're seeing lots of complaints about bad downloads during the install.
The current caching code in the installer caches whatever gets downloaded.
I'm going to introduce more MD5 checks into the install scripts and in
order to make
Make sure you have [Flex
SDK]/frameworks/libs/player/XX.X/playerglobal.swc file at least for one
XX.X.
If you change anything in Flex SDK installation (e.g. add
playerglobal.swc file) then to make sure that IntelliJ IDEA noticed your
changes do following:
- File | Synchronize
- Delete and add
HI,
There is a tag for each RC, I believe. Did I miss one?
Think so the tag for the actually release in missing (in TLF as well).
Justin
HI,
Ok, one week later, there are 43 (!) tests failing:
I'll take a look at the the two Alert tests tat are still failing.
Justin
I’m working on cell selection of TLF tables.
Cell selections does not fit into the normal index based selection concept of
text. To support cell selection, I need coordinate-based selection (to support
rectangular selections within a table).
Basically, I want to add some table-specific
Adding to an API shouldn't be a problem, as long as the new
methods/properties don't change anything about the existing
implementation...
EdB
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Harbs harbs.li...@gmail.com wrote:
I’m working on cell selection of TLF tables.
Cell selections does not fit into
Hi,
I fixed the Alert test that were failing - what was odd was sometime the test
passed and sometimes they failed due to sub pixel differences. New baseline
images should fix that.
Justin
Alex,
In a slightly related question -- is there anyway to force IntelliJ to
rebuild it's indexes / caches for a framework? I've been finding myself
having to add/remove the SDK from the framework list multiple times a
session if I'm trying to work on bugs in the SDK, then recompile, and then
To rebuild all indexes/caches there's File | Invalidate Caches and
restart IDE. Actually this action is for troubleshooting, not for usual
workflow. I guess that's not what you'd like to do on daily basis.
Usually IntelliJ IDEA picks changes automatically, if it's not the case,
File |
Hi,
Are we 100% sure the build machine is set up correctly?
I'm not seeingany failures on first run in:
components/MenuBar/Halo
components/Menu/Halo
components/Menu/Spark
components/Tree
gumbo/components/ComboBox
I had one failure in these which when rerun passed.
gumbo/components/DataGrid
Hi,
Also these all pass first run for me:
gumbo/components/MXItemRenderer
gumbo/core/DataGroup
Justin
We are 99.9% sure, as there is nothing changed on the VM since May 15th,
the last day all the SDK tests passed.
EdB
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.comwrote:
Hi,
Are we 100% sure the build machine is set up correctly?
I'm not seeingany failures on
Would we also add timestamp property[1] sent when downloading a file to make
sure we do not grab the browser cache.
[1] https://www.domain.com/filetodownload.ext?ts=1401195361932
-Mark
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
We're seeing lots of complaints about
Hi,
I can reproduce the Japanese test failures - but no sure what the issue is
there.
Justin
Hi guys,
Done !!
see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34334 for the compiled FDB
I changed completly what I did in the previous fixes to follow the original
coding intention, I mean 1 BP for a file/line (or function) and 1 location per
worker (swf), so, it means, 1 BP could be set
Hi,
Running one of the Japanese tests manually with this code:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
s:Application xmlns:fx=http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009;
xmlns:s=library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark
xmlns:mx=library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx
Sounds awesome!
Trying to support original buggy fdb from closed-source Adobe AIR SDK
was a real headache for me. Now I start thinking about including your
fdb into IntelliJ IDEA installation or just asking IDE users to use
debugger from upcoming Apache Flex SDK.
I'll play with your fdb
Should GOOG_HOME be pointing to one of those directories?
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
In a FlexJS SDK, the google closure compiler.jar goes in
js/lib/google/closure-compiler/compiler.jar
Are you sure you got your environment variables set up
I've also heard of FlexUnit, which I believe is more tuned for class
testing rather than UI interaction testing. I have heard of it being
used for UI testing, but it was tricky to setup.
Just to reiterate, FlexUnit is definitely unit and some integration testing.
It's not intended to do
GOOG_HOME is for closure library, not closure compiler. It should be the
absolute path to the SDK's js/lib/google/closure-library
On 5/27/14 7:45 AM, Darrell Loverin darrell.love...@gmail.com wrote:
Should GOOG_HOME be pointing to one of those directories?
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:32 AM,
Are you sure you pulled and built Nick's XMLListCollection changes?
On 5/27/14 5:23 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
Also these all pass first run for me:
gumbo/components/MXItemRenderer
gumbo/core/DataGroup
Justin
Hi,
That might we worth doing? Any objections?
No objections, but we would need to be careful in not to break the installers
caching mechanism.
Thanks,
Justin
Some tests require the full folder to be run all together. Cherry picking
individual tests may not work. It shouldn't be this way, but sometimes
there are other tests that affect the position of components in a
subsequent test and the gradient can be slightly different and cause
problems.
-Alex
Hi,
Are you sure you pulled and built Nick's XMLListCollection changes?
100% surre. On latest develop branch and have done a clean compile of
everything in en_US and ja_JP. Git log shows his change and merge.
(053f8619cd5647b867f04a19d9afe797eaccd58f and
If someone has their own implementation of an interface, adding an API to
an interface can break them. The verifier will see that not all methods
are implemented.
It is a trade-off. You can create an ISelectionManager2 or
ITableSelectionManager to be completely safe, but the odds you will break
Just so I understand. The practice is to tag some RC as the final tag?
The RC and the final tag should point to the same revision?
On 5/27/14 3:39 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
HI,
There is a tag for each RC, I believe. Did I miss one?
Think so the tag for the actually
Hi,
Just so I understand. The practice is to tag some RC as the final tag?
That should be the case for the SDK yes. I'm noticed in the past we've not
always tagged each RC. Having the released tagged makes it clear what was
released especially in TLF were it may of f tagged with the RC tags.
Hi,
Looking at the flash log on running the test I can see this error - not sure
why I don;t get this if I manually run the test via the code.
Error #1063: Argument count mismatch on runtimeErrorTests/cmpFn(). Expected 2,
got 3.
Any one have a n idea why this may be the case?
Thanks,
Justin
Dear (ex?)Flexers,
I'm having a problem while compiling a simple app that uses antipatterns.
Here's a partial sample:
fx:Script
![CDATA[
import org.apache.flex.createjs.TextButton;
private var obj:TextButton = new TextButton();
(...)
]]
/fx:Script
Error when compiling with FlexJS (FalconJX
Are you trying to build a CreateJS application? Otherwise, try using
org.apache.flex.html.TextButton.
One of the differences in FlexJS is that there can be multiple
implementations of a component. The createjs.TextButton wraps the button
used in CreateJS. There is one for Jquery, hopefully
Take a look at Application in the org.apache.flex.creatjs project. There's
a note about bringing in the createJS package.
Peter Ent
Adobe Systems
On 5/27/14 11:48 AM, Logibérica - Paulo Esgaio pesg...@logiberica.com
wrote:
Dear (ex?)Flexers,
I'm having a problem while compiling a simple app
Okay. I’m going to just implement it in ISelectionManager. On the odd chance
that I do break someone’s implementation, it should be a relatively easy job to
add some blank functions to honor the interface promise (assuming they don’t
need the table support).
On May 27, 2014, at 6:22 PM, Alex
Abobe still sells FB so Im not sure they really wanted to have the CLI version
completely working, what Im sure instead as you may have noticed, is that it
never been tested against workers.
Happy to help if it can bring us complete integration in IntelliJ.
Waiting for your feedback
Envoyé
That's probably fine. However, consider that some folks are using
third-party libraries that no longer have active developers so they won't
always be able to fix it. Still, I will be surprised if we break anybody.
-Alex
On 5/27/14 9:32 AM, Harbs harbs.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay. I’m going to
I guess if we discover that it’s a problem, we can always revert
ISelectionManager and create a new interface for cell selection. But I agree
that it’s highly unlikely that it’s a problem.
On May 27, 2014, at 9:46 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
That's probably fine. However, consider
These particular tests are setup up with a try/catch block to trap a
different error but end up trapping this one instead.
-Alex
On 5/27/14 8:51 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
Looking at the flash log on running the test I can see this error - not
sure why I don;t get
Hi,
These particular tests are setup up with a try/catch block to trap a
different error but end up trapping this one instead.
Sure but why does the stand alone code which replicates the test (posed in this
thread) get the correct exception? Sort of implies there some sort of state
going on
The JA langpack tests seem to be broken my Labriola's fix for FLEX-34320.
The new logic around setting the hasFieldName and hadPreviousFieldName
changed and is no longer trigging the expected error which lets the code
continue and trigger this new error.
Mike, your thoughts on the logic? The
Mike, your thoughts on the logic? The test sets up two SortFields and a
compare function on the Sort (not the SortFields) then calls findItem.
The first SortField's field name is a non-existent field. I think the old
logic would see if the field existed in the data item. The new logic seems
FB can cache SWCs. I always close and re-open FB when changing SWCs in an
SDK. Could that somehow affect the different results you got on some
other mustella tests? I got failures in MXItemRenderer and DataGroup.
I'm going to take a look at those now.
On 5/27/14 12:58 PM, Justin Mclean
Hi,
FB can cache SWCs. I always close and re-open FB when changing SWCs in an
SDK. Could that somehow affect the different results you got on some
other mustella tests?
Shouldn't do as those were via via the command line not from FB.
justin
You should get an arg count mismatch. By changing the (!hasFieldName) test on
Sort.as line 413 I got the expected result (Find criteria must contain all
sort fields)
Thanks. I think there may have been a bad merge on my part too as it seems the
logic that was checked in is also missing
I just looked at another failure (DataGroup). It also points at this set
of changes. It turns out that Sort.fields can be null if you don't have
any SortFields and only a Sort.compareFunction. It fails on line 395.
You'll need a null check there.
On 5/27/14 1:16 PM, Michael A. Labriola
And finally:
- The Menu/MenuBar/Tree/DataGrid/MXItemRenderer failures are a result of
the XMLListCollection change. I looked at MXItemRenderer and it appears
that the test is expecting an updateComplete when an XML node is added to
the collection. Does this no longer happen because the parent
And in case you missed it, yesterday I found an problem with the commit
for FLEX-34078 fix callouts closing. I'm assuming we want to get all of
these cleaned up before we do 4.12.2? I probably have a few days of
install script work ahead of me to try to checksum downloads and handle
caching in
- The Menu/MenuBar/Tree/DataGrid/MXItemRenderer failures are a result of the
XMLListCollection change. I looked at MXItemRenderer and it appears that the
test is expecting an updateComplete when an XML node is added to the
collection. Does this no longer happen because the parent is not
I just looked at another failure (DataGroup). It also points at this set of
changes. It turns out that Sort.fields can be null if you don't have any
SortFields and only a Sort.compareFunction. It fails on line 395.
You'll need a null check there.
Thanks, that is the one I actually failed to
I recently found a good library of CSS Styles fpr mobile.
http://goratchet.com/
Bobby
On May 27, 2014, at 3:03 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Swen van Zanten i...@hdsign.nl wrote:
Hi Om,
Do you have an example of what the components
I figured out my problem. My FALCONJX_HOME was pointing to the repos source
not the binary package. That was because I didn't know where to set it in
the binary package. In the repos source, compiler.jar was in the
compiler.jx/lib/google directory. I created a 'closure-compiler' directory
and
OK, thanks. I'll try to remember to add that.
On 5/27/14 8:07 PM, Darrell Loverin darrell.love...@gmail.com wrote:
I figured out my problem. My FALCONJX_HOME was pointing to the repos
source
not the binary package. That was because I didn't know where to set it in
the binary package. In the
55 matches
Mail list logo
