On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> OK, CrossBridge uses unix tools like gcc and swig. So removing the cygwin
> requirement will be painful.
>
> What is the current sentiment? Require Cygwin or Visual Studio? At least
> Cygwin is free. In theory other unix shells for Windows
OK, CrossBridge uses unix tools like gcc and swig. So removing the cygwin
requirement will be painful.
What is the current sentiment? Require Cygwin or Visual Studio? At least
Cygwin is free. In theory other unix shells for Windows will work but
CrossBridge doc onl mentions Cygwin.
Meanwhile,
Well, I'm new to Native Extensions as well, but it appears you can't
create a single extension that works on both OSX and Windows. Folks seem
to be using Visual Studio for Windows and Xcode for Mac. That seems like
a lot of work and a complicated build environment. The nice thing about
the Cross
Infra has been messing around with email/spam filters. I saw on their
lists that they expect more bounce messages, but I will check with them to
see if things are working as they expect.
On 6/2/14 4:36 PM, "Gordon Smith" wrote:
>I've gotten maybe 8-10 such emails over the last 2-3 months for va
A simple POST test worked for me. Did you get an error? What were you
trying to post?
-Alex
On 6/2/14 10:18 AM, "pesgaio" wrote:
>Thak you, but I meant a FlexJS example.
>
>
>
>
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-HTTPService-Ex
>amp
This is the message in question:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Error-Could-not-find-compiled-resource-bundle-collections-for-locale-en-US-td37549.html
This was sent via nabble; it could have been a result of that, perhaps?
And I dont see this email in my inbox.
Thanks,
Om
I got the same thing, and the exact same message number referenced. Maybe
that particular message was rejected by Google?
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Angelo Anolin
wrote:
> I received this from dev-h...@flex.apache.org (and I have no idea why I
> got
> it). Any help or insight would be app
I've gotten maybe 8-10 such emails over the last 2-3 months for various Apache
Flex lists. I've been ignoring them because I don't know what else to do.
- Gordon
> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 19:13:12 -0400
> From: jef...@dot-com-it.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Off-Topic] Help With
I got the same email.
Something like this shows up on the private list every couple of
months; and we've had a few non-public discussion about it.
I forget the meaning, but generally I decided it was okay to ignore.
On 6/2/2014 3:22 PM, Angelo Anolin wrote:
I received this from dev-h...@
On 6/2/14 1:02 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> The CrossBridge license doesn't matter too much.
>While it's license may not matter it could depends on what it puts into
>the swf? May effect the LICENSE/NOTICE files.
The CrossBridge compiler just generated ABC code but uses GCC to do it.
Do
In theory, all PMC members with Windows computers have Cygwin or some
shell script processor in place otherwise they cannot run Mustella.
We could create a separate release package like we did for PixelBender,
but seriously, how many of you are going to build the installer from
sources?
I'll look
On 6/2/14 1:02 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
>> I thought we'd given up on Linux installer in favor of ant.
>So that would require us to check the MD5 hashes on Linux another way?
The Ant script does the on Linux.
>
>BTW are we currently using this for MD5 checks?
>https://github.com/mikechamber
I don't think we've fully implement POST yet. Let me take a look.
On 6/2/14 10:18 AM, "pesgaio" wrote:
>Thak you, but I meant a FlexJS example.
>
>
>
>
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-HTTPService-Ex
>ample-tp37930p37933.html
>Sent
> -1 for Cygwin too :-(
Something to note for Windows Users, if you install git bash (which is
generally part of the windows install for git) you can use it in place of
Cygwin. It might be a much easier way for us to move forward instead of
requiring Cygwin.
Mike
FZip has since become as3commons-zip:
http://as3commons.org/as3-commons-zip/index.html
On 2 June 2014 22:07, Justin Mclean wrote:
> HI,
>
> Perhaps this is an option? I like the sound of "parses ZIP archives
> progressively" - which implies non blocking UI to me.
> http://codeazur.com.br/lab/fz
HI,
Perhaps this is an option? I like the sound of "parses ZIP archives
progressively" - which implies non blocking UI to me.
http://codeazur.com.br/lab/fzip/
License compatibility would need to be checked.
Justin
-1 for Cygwin too :-(
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 2. Juni 2014 21:00
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: [Installer] Using Alchemy/CrossBridge in the Installer
As you may have seen, I've added a bunch of MD5 checksums to the installe
Hi,
> The CrossBridge license doesn't matter too much.
While it's license may not matter it could depends on what it puts into the
swf? May effect the LICENSE/NOTICE files.
> Good question about NativeExtension. Does the installer only run on Intel
> CPUs?
Would IMO be reasonable to assume th
The CrossBridge license doesn't matter too much. It will be a compiler
pre-requisite just like Adobe Extension Manager. I did use the sample
code that is MIT licensed to build the md5 swc. I'm checking with Adobe
legal on the rules for that code.
Good question about NativeExtension. Does the i
Hi,
> I think it is worth adding CrossBridge as a build prerequisite to the
> Installer.
CrossBridge seems to be MIT licences [1] but doesn't contain a license file
that I can find. I notice it also includes other licensed software which may
not be Apache compatible, they include libpng, libjpe
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I think you misunderstood. Cygwin is only needed to build the installer,
> not use/run it.
>
>
Ah okay. Then no objections from my side. It is reasonable to expect the
Release Managers to have Cygwin installed.
Thanks,
Om
> Workers won't
I think you misunderstood. Cygwin is only needed to build the installer,
not use/run it.
Workers won't help. It may leave the UI as responsive, but you still have
to wait several minutes for the checksum to be completed.
MD5 is totally async in the installer today. What isn't is the unzip. It
I just started today, so not sure Ill make it but was trying to make workers
more friendly than what they are today, closer than what they are in Java, my
goal was to continue what I wasnt able to finish before with the installer
using workers and sub workers to download and computer the md5, I
I received this from dev-h...@flex.apache.org (and I have no idea why I got
it). Any help or insight would be appreciated.
dev-h...@flex.apache.org
1:00 PM (20 minutes ago)
to me
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
dev@flex.apache.org mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> As you may have seen, I've added a bunch of MD5 checksums to the installer
> in hopes of detecting bad downloads and reporting them to the tracker so
> we can see if bad downloads is the root cause of many of the install
> failures that have be
As you may have seen, I've added a bunch of MD5 checksums to the installer
in hopes of detecting bad downloads and reporting them to the tracker so
we can see if bad downloads is the root cause of many of the install
failures that have been reported.
The current built-in MD5Stream, written in AS,
On 6/2/14 11:25 AM, "Michael A. Labriola"
wrote:
>>Makes sense and we probably should have done that in the first place.
>>But since we didn't, do we change behavior and risk breaking folks or
>>add a flag and keep both code paths?
>
>The problem I have with two code paths is how do we choose b
>Makes sense and we probably should have done that in the first place. But
>since we didn't, do we change behavior and risk breaking folks or add a flag
>and keep both code paths?
The problem I have with two code paths is how do we choose between them? Are we
going to do a version number check
On 6/2/14 10:46 AM, "Michael A. Labriola"
wrote:
>>A totally reasonable scenario. It is tempting to simply remove this
>>check, but you never know when someone is relying on this behavior.
>
>I am not really suggesting that we remove it completely, just rather that
>we consider it an OR. A Sor
A bunch of us met at 360Flex 2014 two weeks ago. There was a lot of
interest in creating a new Apache Flex User Group in the silicon valley aka
SF bay area. I went ahead and set up a first meeting. We dont have a
definite agenda yet. The group members will be determining the agenda.
Details her
>A totally reasonable scenario. It is tempting to simply remove this check,
>but you never know when someone is relying on this behavior.
I am not really suggesting that we remove it completely, just rather that we
consider it an OR. A SortField's name must either be valid or it must have a
co
Thak you, but I meant a FlexJS example.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-HTTPService-Example-tp37930p37933.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 6/2/14 7:38 AM, "Michael A. Labriola"
wrote:
>>It's a valid question. There is probably no one right answer. My
>>answer is that, if you didn't intend the compareFunction to use the
>>field name in the SortField, why use a SortField at all? Why not just
>>use the top-level Sort compareFun
http://blog.flexexamples.com/2007/10/29/passing-parameters-to-an-httpservice/
On 02/06/2014 17:38, pesgaio wrote:
Does anyone have an HTTPService example, using POST?
I'm having some dificulties sending data to an from the server.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-
Does anyone have an HTTPService example, using POST?
I'm having some dificulties sending data to an from the server.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/HTTPService-Example-tp37930.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list
Ok, I think this approach could be working. Probably you'll need to
introduce a new special scope in order not to intersect with scopes used
by people. Or may be instead of scope it would be possible to use some
other classification feature. I guess only
playerglobal.swc/airglobal.swc contain O
Well I'm not assuming that "isInternal" isn't used and can be ignored, I'm just
assuming that I can make a Source internal by providing the appropreate scopes
in flexmojos and hence make the "copy the file around and internally rename"
hack obsolete.
But I'll be able to investigate this in more
Hi,
Not sure if it has been pointed out already but I tried to download the nightly
build using FP 1.4 and AIR 3.4 but had Apache Flex 4.13.0 FP11.7 AIR3.4 en_US
in the flex-sdk-description.xml
Here is the partial log [1], everything seems ok, the problem should be when
the flex-sdk-descriptio
I don't know.
I'm sure Velo also did some simple testing before releasing Flexmojos
3.7.0. But the problem came in real-life complex multi-modular project
[1] and he had to release 7.0.1.
flex2.compiler.Source#isInternal() method has 24 usages and I can't say
for sure that all of them can be si
Maybe a few warnings when 1) developer NOT using same version( between
playerglobal and target player); 2) developer explicitly declare
playerglobal as internal/external. -Gary
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Christofer Dutz
wrote:
> Ähem ... actually I didn't want to treat it any different
>It's a valid question. There is probably no one right answer. My answer is
>that, if you didn't intend the compareFunction to use the field name in the
>SortField, why use a SortField at all? Why not just use the top-level Sort
>compareFunction.
Just continuing the discussion. I think the c
But why does it produce running applications if I remove the special handling?
(I am using the legacy compiler)
Chris
Von: Alexander Doroshko
Gesendet: Montag, 2. Juni 2014 16:16
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Is/Was there a requirement for
Ähem ... actually I didn't want to treat it any different than the rest.
First I should make clear:
Flexmojos ("external") tells the compiler not to include the classes in the
output, "internal" includes everything into the output. I think the Flex
compiler has a different definition of this (T
You are right that playerglobal.swc has "external" dependency scope in
Maven terms (and -external-library-path in terms of Flex compiler
options). Custom SWCs also may have "external" scope configred by user
who wants to omit inclusion of classes from this custom SWC. From maven
point of view b
Chris, You are right, I think it would be better to treat playerglobal
specially, it is the NOT opensource core of Flash platform. -Gary
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Christofer Dutz
wrote:
> I Just had a look at the code and it seems that the hard-coded name is
> only used in order to decide
I Just had a look at the code and it seems that the hard-coded name is only
used in order to decide if the dependency is "internal".
In Flexmojos I can set scopes "internal" and "external" (I think in Flexmojos
Scopes the playerglobal should be "external").
So I'll investigate if setting the pla
That's just a bad package name. Code that relies on playerglobal.swc
file name is still in use in Apache Flex SDK 4.12.
On 02.06.2014 13:15, Christofer Dutz wrote:
Well I'll do a little exploration ...
But as you posted in one of your last posts, it looks as if this is comming
from some flex2
Well I'll do a little exploration ...
But as you posted in one of your last posts, it looks as if this is comming
from some flex2 compiler.
Could It be possible that the problems of hard-coded names would only affect
Flex 2 Applications built with Apache Flex? I mean 3.7.1 seems to have been
On 02.06.2014 12:41, Christofer Dutz wrote:
Well I am currently experimenting with the Flexmojos Build, but it seems the
compiler is producing swfs and swcs correctly even if playerglobal is called
playerglobal-13.0.swc ...
Marvin thought so too with Flexmojos 3.7 release and had to release
3.
Well I am currently experimenting with the Flexmojos Build, but it seems the
compiler is producing swfs and swcs correctly even if playerglobal is called
playerglobal-13.0.swc ...
If there are parts in the SDK that have this hard-coded name, would it be
reasonable to refactor these? I would cert
I'm afraid hardcoded "playerglobal.swc" is still not wiped out from the
compiler sources. See
flex2.compiler.mxml.lang.StandardDefs#SWC_PLAYERGLOBAL, its usage in
flex2.compiler.CompilerSwcContext#createSource() and further usages of
flex2.compiler.Source#isInternal(). With renamed playerglobal
51 matches
Mail list logo
