+1 (binding)
Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.1/rc8/apache-flex-s
dk-installer-3.1.0-src.tar.gz
Java 1.7
OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.8.5
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: y
RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No
We have finally approved Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.1.
Final tally (binding votes):
+1 : Justin, Om, Peter, Alex
Community Votes
+1 : Erik
On 7/8/14 12:26 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 3.1 to be
released.
Issues addressed
Hi PMC members,
4.13.0 RC3 is now 12 days old. There is a +1 from Mark Kessler, and a -1
from Justin.
I think Justin's -1 is because you can't generate RSLs correctly from the
source kit. It looks like we've had this problem since 4.11 and nobody
has complained since the Installer sets
Hey Om, I agree with you. But instead of arguing this with Justin, can
you instead find the time to vote on this package? FalconJX has enough
votes. SDK 4.13.0 doesn't unless Justin changes his vote. FlexJS doesn't
unless Justin changes his vote.
Justin is getting failures in FlexJS that
Will be on it tonight.
Frédéric THOMAS
From: aha...@adobe.com
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 06:19:01 +
Hi PMC members,
4.13.0 RC3 is now 12 days old. There is a +1 from Mark Kessler, and a -1
from Justin.
Wow ... ok ... didn't know he was working on making falcon buildable by maven
... but that surely would completeley eliminate the need for me to mavenize
anything at all.
Thanks for pointing that out ... Will write my feedback in a separate thread.
Chris
Hi (especially) Jose,
I was just informed that you are working on making falcon buildable with Maven.
First of all that is great.
But we should coordinate how the artifacts are called.
I could see that your artifacts for the compiler are located in the groupId
org.apache.flex. You would
Hey, don't forget about votes [1] from mere committers such as myself!
:-)
EdB
1:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/flex-dev/201407.mbox/%3CCAJs%2BwW3sASPzaQT9K3PuYT3etm5SrfObaEwzEC6aS-oqQTBqHg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T.
On Jul 14, 2014 11:29 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
Hey Om, I agree with you. But instead of arguing this with Justin, can
you instead find the time to vote on this package? FalconJX has enough
votes. SDK 4.13.0 doesn't unless Justin changes his vote. FlexJS doesn't
unless Justin
Hi,
I think Justin's -1 is because you can't generate RSLs correctly from the
source kit.
The RSL version number being wrong is an issue but not the major one, the major
issue os that AIR or mobile apps can't be compiled. The error message you get
in in the vote thread.
Justin
Hi,
As for me, I am testing the related java barcode generator
http://www.keepautomation.com/products/java_barcode/ these days. Do you
have any ideas about it? Or any good suggestion? I am totally a green hand
on barcode generating field. Any suggestion will be appreciated. Thanks in
advance.
IMO, no need to change that, I've seen some other software writing the same
sentence.
At 2014-07-15 01:19:42, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
IMO, it can be either way, but thanks for pointing that out. One could
argue that there shouldn't be a question mark at the end.
I think I've seen
Hi,
I can compile and run the AIR desktop mobile apps by using Flex SDK 4.13.0
RC2 with Flash Builder 4.7
I haven't tried RC3 yet, are there some major differences between RC2 RC3?
DarkStone
2014-07-15
At 2014-07-15 04:41:01, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
I think
Hi Chris,
Good to chat to you again, finally.
I just continue the original initiative, started by Carlos Rovira in order to
mavenized the falcon project from their build process.
Regarding the group id name you mentioned, I don't have any problem to adopt
your proposal.
I'm open to get help
Hi all,
is this[1] still valid? I can't see the folder site in our git repo.
Is the profile still updatable via svn, then?
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Updating+your+profile+on+Team+page
On 14 July 2014 11:29, Mihai Chira mihai.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
I've just edited
On 15/07/14 13:02, Mihai Chira wrote:
Is the profile still updatable via svn, then?
The Wiki looks right to me. It's SVN rather than GIT because that's what
the CMS uses.
Tom
Is there a way to write and run unit tests (e.g. FlexUnit) to test the
SDK? I know we use Mustella, but from what I can tell, mustella tests
need a UI / swf to run, rather than just testing a class without the
need for a UI.
I ask because I'd like to write some unit tests for
Hi Jose,
having such a thing would have the major benefit hof being able to publish
SNAPSHOTS of the compiler automatically.
I think this would be a major breakthrough for bleeding edge developers ...
simply referencing org.apache.flex.compiler:falcon-compiler:pom:4.13.0-SNAPSHOT
would allow
Hi Mihai,
You can check branch with TLF unit tests, maybe it will help you a bit.
http://bit.ly/1zEX3GY
Piotr
-
Apache Flex Committer
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Unit-testing-the-SDK-tp39141p39143.html
Hi,
Do I need to write mustella tests, or can I write FlexUnit ones?
IMO any tests are fine and mustella test can be tricky to write if you're new
to it.
Justin
I'm running through all of the examples (using the RC code, not from the
repo). They all compile cleanly, just need to actually run each (aside
from the 4 I ran for the vote). The AS version of DataGrid isn't working
right, but the JS version is (the multiple scrollbars are known and have
been
Thanks for that, good to know.
But I just did a global search for flexunit in all *.as files in
both the sdk and tlf. The only ones I could find are in
tlf\automation_core\src\UnitTest\. Does this mean I am going to write
and commit the first ever unit (i.e. non-mustella) tests for the SDK?
That
PS: searching for [Test] in all *.as files yields 0 results as well.
On 15 July 2014 15:12, Mihai Chira mihai.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for that, good to know.
But I just did a global search for flexunit in all *.as files in
both the sdk and tlf. The only ones I could find are in
TLF unit tests were written in Flex Unit 1, so you will not find in develop
branch any test marked [Test], but in branch FlexUnit4TestsTLF you will find
couple of tests rewritten to Flex Unit 4.
I hope I will back to this soon.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex Committer
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
Hi,
PS: searching for [Test] in all *.as files yields 0 results as well.
I have about 80 or so FlexUnit collection tests that were in my white board to
supplement the mustella ones, but they are not currently run automatically.
Given that Flex Unit has been released under Apache I see no
Hi,
I'm running through all of the examples (using the RC code, not from the
repo). They all compile cleanly, just need to actually run each (aside
from the 4 I ran for the vote).
Thanks for that - still a mystery why they fail here, it's probably a setup
issue / (perhaps something missing
On 7/15/14 1:41 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
I think Justin's -1 is because you can't generate RSLs correctly from
the source kit.
The RSL version number being wrong is an issue but not the major one, the
major issue os that AIR or mobile apps can't be compiled. The
I have about 80 or so FlexUnit collection tests that were in my white board to
supplement the mustella ones, but they are not currently run automatically.
I also have some in my whiteboard for VectorCollection and there are the
FlexUnit tests themselves in the FlexUnit repo.
But no, there
All right, good to know.
About the path - should I add a unit test called
HierarchicalCollectionViewCursorTest_FLEX_34119 in
sdk\frameworks\projects\advancedgrids\test\mx\collections, or is it
better in sdk\frameworks\tests\mx\collections?
Also, what is the whiteboard? The only things I could
I received a few emails stating that making it open source is not the same
as donating it to Apache Flex which is what I wanted to do. I'm in the
process of seeing what that takes and finding out even if Apache Flex
community wants it to be part of the Apache Flex project at all. That would
mean
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:32 AM, jude flexcapaci...@gmail.com wrote:
I received a few emails stating that making it open source is not the same
as donating it to Apache Flex which is what I wanted to do. I'm in the
process of seeing what that takes and finding out even if Apache Flex
+1 (Binding)
Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.13.0/rc3/apache-flex-sdk-4.13.0-src.zip
Java 1.7
OS: Windows 7 x86 6.1
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: y
RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No unapproved licenses or
Hi,
My understanding (from the installer vote thread) was that you were having
trouble with AIR apps after installing 4.12 and it went away after
re-starting FB. Is that not the case?
The 4.13.0 RC3 source package when compiled fails to compile any AIR or mobile
application as it is missing
I also confirm adl is missing.
Is it a stopper for this release as most if not all the people use the
installer ?
Frédéric THOMAS
Subject: Re: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval
From: jus...@classsoftware.com
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 08:08:30 +1000
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Hi,
Hi,
Is it a stopper for this release as most if not all the people use the
installer ?
IMO yes - hence my vote - but other PMC members are free to vote how they like.
Again if it get 3 +1 votes and more +1 than -1 that makes it a valid release.
Remember you're voting on this source release
Ideally, if the fix doesn't delay to much the release, it would be nice to have
it, otherwise, there's the workaround as mention Erik:
After running 'ant frameworks-rsls', ./'ide/constructFlexForIDE.sh' AND
'./ide/addAIRtoSDK.sh':
- SDK is recognised by Flash Builder
- Flash Player apps build and
I haven't been able to do a full test on the suite -- but ADL missing is a
huge -1.
We are worried about small regressions that fix bugs -- we can't let
something like this pass.
-1 Binding
-Nick
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Justin Mclean justinmcl...@me.com wrote:
Hi,
Is it a
I haven't been able to do a full test on the suite -- but ADL missing is a
huge -1.
We are worried about small regressions that fix bugs -- we can't let
something like this pass.
-1 Binding
-Nick
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Frédéric THOMAS webdoubl...@hotmail.com
wrote:
+1 (Binding)
Justin,
Adl is missing because the 'constructForIDE' script doesn't copy it for the
Mac. Use the 'AddAIRToSDK' script in addition to it and all is well. See my
previous vote email on the subject, where I change my vote to +1.
EdB
On Wednesday, July 16, 2014, Justin Mclean justinmcl...@me.com
Furthermore, adl is part of the AIR sdk and is not owned by Apache Flex,
and not under Apache Flex source control. It should not be in the source
package nor should it end up in the bin folder after building. That's
what these other scripts do: they copy incompatibly-licensed external
stuff into
Hi,
Furthermore, adl is part of the AIR sdk and is not owned by Apache Flex,
and not under Apache Flex source control. It should not be in the source
package nor should it end up in the bin folder after building.
Correct (and adl is not in the source package) but it is required for a working
On 7/15/14 10:08 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
Furthermore, adl is part of the AIR sdk and is not owned by Apache Flex,
and not under Apache Flex source control. It should not be in the
source
package nor should it end up in the bin folder after building.
Correct
A simple addition of the need to run 'addAIRtoSDK' to the README is enough
to 'fix' this. No need for a new RC, no need for further delay.
EdB
On Wednesday, July 16, 2014, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
On 7/15/14 10:08 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com
javascript:; wrote:
+1 (binding)
Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.13.0/rc3/apache-flex-sdk-
4.13.0-src.tar.gz
Java 1.7
OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.8.5
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: y
RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No unapproved licenses
Justin,
I love it how you completely ignore my proposed solution. What do you say
about addAIRtoSDK?
EdB
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com
wrote:
Hi,
Because you claim the source package should contain bin/adl.
I'm am not or never had claimed that.
On 7/15/14 10:41 PM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
A simple addition of the need to run 'addAIRtoSDK' to the README is enough
to 'fix' this. No need for a new RC, no need for further delay.
But that's only if you try to use the source package in an IDE. I built
the source package,
Not sure if you can - or should - cast a binding vote without completely
testing the release. Are you just casting the -1 vote because you agree
with Justin, or have you actually replicated the issue?
EdB
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 5:04 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski nicho...@spoon.as
wrote:
I
47 matches
Mail list logo
